Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 27, 2008 - Issue 1
541
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Human embryos as boundary objects? Some reflections on the biomedical worlds of embryonic stem cells and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

, , &
Pages 7-18 | Published online: 07 May 2008

References

  • Bazanger, I., 1998. "Pain physicians: all alike, all different". In: Berg, M., and Mol, A., eds. Differences in medicine: unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies. Durham: Duke University Press; 1998. pp. 119–143.
  • Becker, H. S., 1984. Art worlds. Berkeley: California University Press; 1984.
  • Braude, P., et al., 2002. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Nature Reviews Genetics 3 (2002), pp. 941–953.
  • Brown, N., and Webster, A., 2004. New medical technologies and society: reordering life. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
  • Casper, M. J., 1998. The making of the unborn patient: a social anatomy of fetal surgery. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
  • Clarke, A. E., 1990. "A social worlds research adventure: the case of reproductive science". In: Cozzens, S., and Gieryn, T., eds. Theories of science in society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1990. pp. 23–50.
  • Clarke, A. E., 2005. Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage; 2005.
  • Cooper, M., 2004. Regenerative medicine: stems cells and the science of monstrosity, Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities 30 (2004), pp. 12–22.
  • Cooper, M., 2006. Resuscitations: stem cells and the crisis of old age, Body and Society 12 (2006), pp. 1–23.
  • Department of Health, 2005. UK stem cell initiative: [Pattison] report and recommendations. London: HMSO; 2005.
  • Ehrich, K., et al., 2006. Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary-work in the IVF/PGD clinic, Social Science and Medicine 63 (2006), pp. 1213–1224.
  • Featherstone, K., et al., 2006. Risky relations: family, kinship and the new genetics. Oxford: Berg; 2006.
  • Franklin, S., 2001. Culturing biology: cell lines for the second millennium, Health 5 (2001), pp. 335–354.
  • Franklin, S., 2005. "Stem cells r us: emergent life forms and the global biological". In: Ong, A., and Collier, S. J., eds. Global assemblages: technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. New York: Blackwell; 2005. pp. 59–78.
  • Franklin, S., 2006. Embryonic economies: the double reproductive value of stem cells, BioSocieties 1 (2006), pp. 71–90.
  • Franklin, S., and Roberts, C., 2006. Born and made: an ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. New York: Princeton University Press; 2006.
  • Fujimura, J., 1992. "Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects and “translations”". In: Pickering, A., ed. Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press; 1992. pp. 168–211.
  • Glasner, P., 1998. "Patrolling the boundaries or tracing the contours: cartographic metaphors and the human genome project". In: Wheale, P., von Schomberg, R., and Glasner, P., eds. The social management of genetic engineering. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1998. pp. 29–44.
  • Harper, J. C., and Delhanty, J. D.A., 2000. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Current Opinions in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 12 (2) (2000), pp. 67–72.
  • Hauskeller, C., 2004. How traditions of ethical reasoning and institutional processes shape stem cell research in Britain, Journal of Medical Philosophy 29 (2004), pp. 509–532.
  • Hauskeller, C., Bender, W., and Manzai, A., 2005. Crossing borders: cultural, religious, and political differences concerning stem cell research. A global approach. Münster: Agenda Verlag; 2005.
  • Holland, S., Lebacqz, K., and Zoloth, L., 2001. The human embryonic stem cell debate: science, ethics and public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2001.
  • Jasanoff, S., 2005. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press; 2005.
  • Kalfoglou, A. L., Scott, J., and Hudson, K., 2005. PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Reproductive Biomedicine Online 11 (2005), pp. 486–496.
  • Keating, P., and Cambrosio, A., 2003. Biomedical platforms: realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth century medicine. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.
  • Kerr, A., 2003. Governing genetics: reifying choice and progress, New Genetics and Society 22 (2003), pp. 111–126.
  • Kiessling, A. A., and Anderson, S., 2003. Human embryonic stem cells: an introduction to the science and the therapeutic potential. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; 2003.
  • Kitzinger, J., and Williams, C., 2005. Forecasting science futures: legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate, Social Science and Medicine 61 (2005), pp. 731–740.
  • Lanza, R., et al., 2004. Handbook of stem cells. Volume 1. Embryonic stem cells. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.
  • Maienschein, J., 2003. Whose view of life? Embryos, cloning and stem cells. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003.
  • Meister, U., et al., 2005. Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany, Human Reproduction 20 (2005), pp. 231–238.
  • Mooney, C., 2005. The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books; 2005.
  • Mulkay, M., 1997. The embryo research debate: science and the politics of reproduction. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
  • Parry, S., 2003. The politics of cloning: mapping the rhetorical convergence of embryos and stem cells in parliamentary debates, New Genetics and Society 22 (2003), pp. 145–168.
  • Pickering, S. J., et al., 2005. Generation of a human embryonic stem cell line encoding the cystic fibrosis mutation deltaF508, using preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 (2005), pp. 390–397.
  • Pinto-Correia, C., 1997. The ovary of eve: egg and sperm and preformation. Chicago University Press; 1997.
  • Roberts, C., and Franklin, S., 2004. Experiencing new forms of genetic choice: findings from an ethnographic study of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Human Fertility 7 (2004), pp. 285–293.
  • Scott, C. T., 2006. Stem cell now: from the experiment that shook the world to the new politics of life. New York: Pi Press; 2006.
  • Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J., 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science 19 (1989), pp. 387–420.
  • Strauss, A., 1978. A social world perspective, Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1 (1978), pp. 119–128.
  • Strauss, A. L., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
  • Strauss, A. L., et al., 1985. Social organization of medical work. Chicago University Press; 1985.
  • Thompson, J., et al., 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts, Science 282 (1998), pp. 1145–1147.
  • Wainwright, S. P., et al., 2052–2064. From bench to bedside? Biomedical scientists' expectations of stem cell science as a future therapy for diabetes, Social Science and Medicine 63 (2052–2064).
  • Wainwright, S. P., et al., 2006b. Real science, biological bodies and stem cells: constructing images of beta cells in the biomedical science lab, Social Theory and Health 4 (2006b), pp. 275–298.
  • Wainwright, S. P., et al., 2006c. Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory, Sociology of Health and Illness 28 (2006c), pp. 732–748.
  • Wainwright, S. P., et al., 2007. Remaking the body? Scientists' genetic discourses and practices as examples of changing expectations on embryonic stem cell therapy for diabetes, New Genetics and Society (2007).
  • Waldby, C., 2002. Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue, Health 6 (2002), pp. 305–323.
  • Waters, B., and Cole-Turner, T., 2003. God and the embryo: religious voices on stem cells and cloning. Washington: Georgetown University Press; 2003.
  • Watt, H., 2004. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: choosing the “good enough” child, Health Care Analysis 12 (2004), pp. 51–60.
  • Weber, R., 1990. Basic content analysis. London: Sage; 1990.
  • Williams, C., Kitzinger, J., and Henderson, L., 2003. Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: discursive strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates, Sociology of Health and Illness 25 (2003), pp. 793–814.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.