Oocyte markets: women's reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research

References

• Barnett, A., and Smith, H., 2006. Cruel cost of the human egg trade, Observer (2006), 30 April 2006 [online]. Available from: www.observer.guardian.co.uk [Accessed 26 May 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., and Glasner, P., 2004. Spare embryos and biotech futures: embryonic stem cell research in India. Presented at Paper presented at the Society for Social Studies of Science/European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Conference. Paris, 24–29, August, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• British Fertility Society, 2005. Fertility specialists welcome sperm and egg donor campaign but call for more action in time for change in law in April 2005, (2005), Press release, 26 January 2005 [online]. Available from: www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/news/pressrelease/05_01-spermeggcampaign.html [Accessed 27 February 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and Webster, A., 2004. New medical technologies and society: reordering life. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1998. "Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics". In: Callon, M., ed. The laws of the market. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. pp. 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., 2007. Women will be paid to donate eggs for science, Observer (2007), p. 1, 18 February.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Genetics and Society, 2006. The California stem cell program at one year: a progress report. (2006), Center for Genetics and Society, January [online]. Available from: www.genetics-and-society.org [Accessed 25 July 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S., 2006. Investigations document still more problems for stem cell researchers, Science 311 (5762) (2006), pp. 754–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., 2001. Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China, Population and Development Review 27 (2) (2001), pp. 259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., 2007. Surplus life – biotechnics and the transformations of capital. Seattle: Washington University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., 2004. Planet of slums: urban involution and the informal proletariat, New Left Review 26 (2004), pp. 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Delavigne, A., and Rozenberg, S., 2002. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review, Human Reproduction Update 8 (2002), pp. 559–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2004. The threatened trade in human ova, Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (2004), pp. 167–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2005. The lady vanishes: what's missing from the stem cell debate, International Journal of Ethics 3 (2005), pp. 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2007. Property in the body: feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, S., 2004. "Women, commodification and embryonic stem-cell research". In: Humber, J., and Almeder, R. F., eds. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2004. pp. 151–174, Biomedical ethics reviews: stem cell research.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B., and Hochschild, A. R., 2002. "Introduction". In: Ehrenreich, B., and Hochschild, A. R., eds. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta Books; 2002. pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2006. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, February 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, 2002. Ethical aspects of human stem cell research and use, (2002), Opinion 15, November 2002 [online]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/avis15_en.pdf [Accessed 25 July 2007].
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2005. "Resolution on the trade in human egg cells". Strasbourg. 2005, 10 March 2005. P6 TA(2005)0074.
   Google Scholar
• France, L., 2006. Passport, tickets, sun cream, sperm, Observer (2006), 17 January 2006 [online]. Available from: www.observer.guardian.co.uk [Accessed 2 March 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. A., 2006. Towards transnational feminisms: some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies, European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (1) (2006), pp. 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA, 2005. SEED report: a report on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's review of sperm, egg and embryo donation in the United Kingdom. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Agency; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA, 2006. Thinking of going abroad? Think twice about going abroad for fertility treatment, (2006), Press release, 27 April 2006 [online]. Available from: www.hfea.gov.uk [Accessed 1 March 2007].
   Google Scholar
• HFEA, 2007. HFEA statement on donating eggs for research, (2007), Press release, 21 February 2007 [online]. Available from: www.hfea.gov.uk [Accessed 1 March 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. S., et al., 2004. Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst, Science Online (2004), 13 February 2004 [online]. Available from: www.science.com [Accessed 2 July 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Hwa-Young, X., 2006. Ova donors demand compensation from government, Asianews.It (2006), [online]. Available from: www.asianews.it [Accessed 2 July 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Jayaraman, K. S., 2005. Indian regulations fail to monitor growing stem-cell use in clinics, Nature 434 (2005), p. 259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J., 2000. Making a market for human embryos, (2000), CNN, 4 September [online]. Available from: www.cnn.com [Accessed 23 January 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Karsjens, K., 2002. Boutique egg donations: a new form of racism and patriarchy, DePaul Journal of Health Care Law 5 (1) (2002), pp. 57–89.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, S. K., 1997. Traditions and reproductive technology in an urbanizing North Indian village, Social Science and Medicine 44 (2) (1997), pp. 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, D., and Cho, M., 2005. Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research, Science 308 (2005), pp. 1747–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magureanu, G., 2005. "Presentation to CORE European seminar: human egg trading and the exploitation of women". European Parliament; 2005, 30 June 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, M., 2005. "Israeli extraction: an ethnographic study of egg donation and national imaginaries". UK: Lancaster University; 2005, Unpublished PhD thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, M., 2006. Materializing Israeliness: difference and mixture in transnational ova donation, Science as Culture 15 (3) (2006), pp. 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.-K., 2005. "Antiretroviral globalism, biopolitics and therapeutic citizenship". In: Ong, A., and Collier, S., eds. Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. pp. 124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Paik, Y.-G., 2006. Beyond bioethics: the globalized reality of ova trafficking and the possibility of feminist intervention. Presented at Paper presented at the International forum on the human rights of women and biotechnology. Seoul, Korea, 21, September, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, A., 2003. Complicating power in high-tech reproduction: narratives of anonymous paid egg donors, Journal of medical humanities 24 (3/4) (2003), pp. 241–263.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., Cooper, M., and Dickins, A., 2006. China and the global stem cell bioeconomy: an emerging political strategy?, 1 (2006), pp. 671–683, Regenerative Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, I., and MacLeod, D., 2005. Cloning plan poses new ethical dilemma: scientist courts controversy with call for women to donate eggs, Guardian (2005), 26 July [online]. Available from: www.guardian.co.uk [Accessed 2 February 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S., 2002. "Global cities and survival circuits". In: Ehrenreich, B., and Hochschild, A. R., eds. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta Books; 2002. pp. 254–274.
   Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, N., 2000. The global traffic in human organs, Current Anthropology 41 (2) (2000), pp. 191–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, S., 2005. Transforming “waste” into “resource”: from women's eggs to economics for women. Presented at Paper presented at the Reprokult Workshop, Femme Globale conference. Berlin, Germany, 10, September, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, D., 1998. Blood: an epic history of medicine and commerce. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbrook, R., 2006. Egg donation and human embryonic stem-cell research, New England Journal of Medicine 354 (4) (2006), pp. 324–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R., 1970/1997. Oakley, A., and Ashton, J., eds. The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy . London: LSE Books; 1970/1997.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2003. 58th General Assembly of the United Nations, summaries of the Work of the Sixth Committee (2003), [online]. Available from: http://www.un.org/law/cod/sixth/58/sixth58.htm [Accessed 12 July 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, G., 2006. Ethical oocytes: available for a price, Science 313 (2006), p. 155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and Mitchell, R., 2006. Tissue economies: blood, organs and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, A.-M., Dean, J., and Sullivan, E., 2006. "Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2003". Sydney. 2006, Working Paper, AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit (Assisted Reproduction Technology Series No. 9).
   Google Scholar