Exploring appropriation of “surplus” ova and embryos in Indian IVF clinics

References

• Ballantyne, A., and de Lacey, S., 2008. Wanted – egg donors for research: a research ethics approach to donor recruitment and compensation, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2) (2008), pp. 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, F., and McLeod, C., 2007. The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research, Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12) (2007), pp. 726–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., and Glasner, P., 2009. Local cells, global science: the rise of embryonic stem cell research in India. London: Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M., 2010. "UK fertility watchdog considers sperm and egg market". In: BioEdge Newsletter. 2010, 28 August.
   Google Scholar
• DBT-ICMR (Department of Biotechnology and Indian Council for Medical Research), 2007. Guidelines for stem cell research and therapy. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2006. The lady vanishes: what's missing from the stem cell debate, Bioethical Inquiry 3 (2006), pp. 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2007. Property in the body: feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., and Alkorta Idiakez, I., 2008. Ova donation for stem cell research: an international perspective, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2) (2008), pp. 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Dizikes, P., 2007. Reluctance of egg donors stymies Harvard efforts, Boston Globe (2007), 7 June [online]. Available from: http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2007/06/07[Accessed 24 June 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Frew, S. E., et al., 2007. India's health biotech sector at a crossroads, Nature Biotechnology 25 (4) (2007), pp. 403–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasner, P., 2009. Cellular division: social and political complexity in Indian stem cell research, New Genetics and Society 28 (3) (2009), pp. 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. A., 2010. Exploring Indian women's reproductive decision-making regarding prenatal testing, Culture, Health and Sexuality 12 (2) (2010), pp. 191–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. A., and Richters, A., 2008. Embodied subjects and fragmented objects: women's bodies, assisted reproduction technologies and the right to self-determination, Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4) (2008), pp. 239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes, E., and Taylor, K., 2009. Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors, Human Reproduction 24 (9) (2009), pp. 2142–2150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen, E., et al., 2007. A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial, Lancet 369 (2007), pp. 743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA, 2007. Statement on donating eggs for research. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1491.html [Accessed 22 May 2007]..
   Google Scholar
• Hyun, I., 2006. Fair payment or undue inducement, Nature 442 (7103) (2006), pp. 629–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IOM-NRC (Institute of Medicine and National Research Council), 2007. Assessing the medical risks of human oocyte donation for stem cell research: workshop report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ISSCR (International Society for Stem Cell Research), 2007. Guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research. 2007, [online]. Available from: http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/index.htm [Accessed 19 August 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L., 2008. Explaining the Hwang scandal: national scientific culture and its global relevance, Science as Culture 17 (4) (2008), pp. 397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, D., and Cho, M. K., 2005. Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research, Science 308 (2005), pp. 1747–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudur, G. S., 2005. Big wonder cells mess, The Telegraph (2005), 20 November.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, D., 2001. Regulating the market for human eggs, Bioethics 15 (1) (2001), pp. 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, E., 2007. Extra embryos: the ethics of cryopreservation in Ecuador and elsewhere, American Ethnologist 34 (1) (2007), pp. 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, B., et al., 2006. "Stem cells in India: emerging economics and the politics of globalization". 2006, Working Paper No. 16, Global Politics Research Group, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, J. L., and Rehmann-Sutter, C., 2006. Creating donors: the 2005 Swiss law on donation of “spare” embryos to hESC research, Bioethical Inquiry 3 (2006), pp. 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., 2010. Young Delhi women donating their eggs for quick bucks, Indo-Asian News Service (2010), 11 February [online]. Available from: http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id5071 [Accessed 20 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, K., 2007. Experimental values, Indian clinical trials and surplus health, New Left Review (2007), 45, May–June, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, M. N., and Koch, L., 2008. Unpacking the “spare embryo”: facilitating stem sell research in a moral landscape, Social Studies of Science 38 (1) (2008), pp. 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., 2005. Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technology. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• UK Stem Cell Initiative, 2005. Global positions in stem cell research. 2005, [online]. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/ab/UKSCI/index.htm [Accessed 19 August 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2008. Oocyte markets: women's reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research, New Genetics and Society 27 (1) (2008), pp. 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and Mitchell, R., 2006. Tissue economies: blood, organs, and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar