Framing pluripotency: iPS cells and the shaping of stem cell science

References

• Adewumi, O., et al., 2007. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative, Nature Biotechnology 25 (2007), pp. 803–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditti, R., Klein, R.D., and Minden, S., 1984. Arditti, R., Klein, R.D., and Minden, S., eds. Test tube women: what future for motherhood?. London: Pandora; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L., 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., 1977. Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., Bloor, D., and Henry, J., 1996. Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W., Hauskeller, C., and Manzei, A., 2005. Bender, W., Hauskeller, C., and Manzei, A., eds. Crossing borders/Grenzüberschreitungen. Münster: Agenda Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, M., 2008. "Pluripotent caricatures". In: Nature Reports Stem Cells [online]. 2008, Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/stemcells.2008.127 [Accessed 29 June 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D., 1991 [1976]. Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991 [1976].
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., et al., 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Special issue, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4) (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I. G., et al., 2007. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos, Nature 448 (7150) (2007), pp. 191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2003. The sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (2003), pp. 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A., 2000. Contested futures: a sociology of prospective techno-science. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesverband Lebensrecht, 2008. "BVL: Kein Korrekturbedarf beim Stammzellgesetz [online]". 2008, Available from: http://www.bv-lebensrecht.de/aktuell/einzelansicht/browse/22/article/bvl-kein-korrekturbedarf-beim-stammzellgesetz.html?tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=517&cHash=20c9d78c83 [Accessed 25 July 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., 2005. Ethos and economics: examining the rationale underlying stem cell and cloning research rationales in the United States, Germany, and Japan, American Journal of Law and Medicine 31 (2005), pp. 47–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., et al., 2003. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and US biomedicine, American Sociological Review 68 (2) (2003), pp. 161–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., 2003. Rediscovering the immortal Hydra: stem cells and the question of epigenesis, Configurations 11 (2003), pp. 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corea, G., 1986. The mother machine. New York: Harper and Row; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, C., et al., 2005. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells, Science 309 (2005), pp. 1369–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disco, C., and van der Meulen, B., 1998. Getting new technologies together. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., and Webster, A., 2008. Standardizing the unknown: practicable pluripotency as doable futures, Science as Culture 17 (1) (2008), pp. 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2002 [1969]. The archeology of knowledge. London: Routledge; 2002 [1969].
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., 2003. "Ethical biocapital: new strategies for cell culture". In: Franklin, S., and Lock, M., eds. Remaking life and death: toward an anthropology of the biosciences. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press; 2003. pp. 97–127.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., and Lock, M., 2003. Franklin, S., and Lock, M., eds. Remaking life and death: toward an anthropology of the biosciences. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H., 2002. Stem cell policies in the United States and in Germany: between bioethics and regulation, Policy Studies Journal 30 (4) (2002), pp. 444–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, C., 2002. "Sprache und Diskursstruktur. Ethische Implikationen und gesellschaftliche Kontexte der Stammzellforschung". In: Oduncu, F., Schroth, U., and Vossenkuhl, W., eds. Stammzellenforschung und therapeutisches Klonen. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Rupprecht; 2002. pp. 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, C., 2004. How traditions of ethical reasoning and institutional processes shape stem cell research in the UK, Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 29 (5) (2004), pp. 509–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, C., 2005. Science in touch: functions of biomedical terminology, Biology & Philosophy 20 (4) (2005), pp. 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A., and Martin, P., 2003. The drugs don't work: expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics, Social Studies of Science 33 (3) (2003), pp. 327–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., 2000. Exploiting technological niches. Enschede: Twente University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2005. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, H., 2007. Culturing life: how cells became technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1999. Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. London: Harvard University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, J., 2004. Embryonic stem cells in drug discovery, Nature 3 (2004), pp. 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, M., and Wainwright, S., 2005. Temporality and prudence: on stem cells as “phronesic things.”, Configurations 13 (2005), pp. 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okita, K., et al., 2008. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors, Science 322 (2008), pp. 949–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passion for Life, 2008. Lords votes; embryo alternatives [online]. Available from: http://www.passionforlife.org.uk/more-news/1-latest-news/230-lords-pp-hunt-test [Accessed 25 July 2010]..
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A., 1995. The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., Geesink, I., and Franklin, S., 2008. Stem cell technologies 1998–2008: controversies and silences. 2nd special issue, Science as Culture 17 (4) (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., 1996. Making PCR: a story of biotechnology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J., 1997. Toward a history of epistemic things: synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 2007. The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., and Rubin, I., 1995. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., and Salter, C., 2007. Bioethics and the global moral economy, Science, Technology & Human Values 32 (5) (2007), pp. 554–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K., Jotterand, F., and Foppa, C., 2004. Stem cell research in Europe. Special issue, Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 29 (5) (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Science, 2007. Breakthrough of the year: the runners-up, Science 318 (5858) (2007), pp. 1844–1849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamblott, M., et al., 1998. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95 (23) (1998), pp. 13726–13731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldner, F., et al., 2009. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors, Cell 136 (5) (2009), pp. 964–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., Atkinson, P., and Glasner, P., 2008. The UK Stem Cell Bank: securing the past, validating the present, protecting the future, Science as Culture 17 (1) (2008), pp. 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K., and Yamanaka, S., 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors, Cell 126 (2006), pp. 663–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K., et al., 2007. Induction of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors, Cell 131 (2007), pp. 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, P. J., et al., 2007. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells, Nature 448 (7150) (2007), pp. 196–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J., et al., 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts, Science 282 (5391) (1998), pp. 1145–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNGA, 2005. United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning. GA Res. 59/280, 59th Sess., UN Doc. A/Res/59/280..
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, G., 1999. Capturing the promise of youth, Science 286 (5448) (1999), pp. 2238–2239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wainwright, S., Michael, M., and Williams, C., 2009. Shifting paradigms? Reflections on regenerative medicine, embryonic stem cells and pharmaceuticals, Sociology of Health & Illness 30 (6) (2009), pp. 959–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2008. Oöcyte markets: women's reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research, New Genetics and Society 27 (1) (2008), pp. 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and Mitchell, R., 2006. Tissue economies: blood, organs, and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S., Wilson-Kovacs, D., and Hauskeller, C., 2011. "The regulation of autologous stem cell therapies: comparing the UK and Germany". In: Lenk, C., et al., eds. Human tissue research: a discussion of the ethical and legal challenges from a European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, A., and Erikkson, L., 2008. Governance-by-standards in the field of stem cells: managing uncertainty in the world of “basic innovation.”, New Genetics and Society 27 (2) (2008), pp. 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmut, I., et al., 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells, Nature 385 (6619) (1997), pp. 810–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Kovacs, D., Weber, S., and Hauskeller, C., 2010. Stem cells clinical trials for cardiac repair: regulation as practical accomplishment, Sociology of Health & Illness 32 (2) (2010), pp. 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltjen, K., et al., 2009. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature 458 (7239) (2009), pp. 766–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., et al., 2007. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells, Science 318 (5858) (2007), pp. 1917–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., et al., 2009. Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences, Science 324 (5928) (2009), pp. 797–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaka, T., and Thomson, J., 2005. A germ cell origin of embryonic stem cells?, Development 132 (2) (2005), pp. 227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar