Disputing the boundary of pluripotency. The Italian public debate on amniotic fluid-derived stem cells

References

• Abbott, A. 2006. “‘Ethical’ Stem-Cell Paper under Attack.” Nature 443 (7107): 12. doi: 10.1038/443012a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. 2009. “Italians Sue over Stem Cells.” Nature 460 (7251): 19. doi: 10.1038/460019a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrame, L. 2012. “Embedding Society in Cells: Science, Ethics and Politics in the Italian Debate on Stem Cell Research.” In Differing Routes to Stem Cell Research: Germany and Italy, edited by R. G. Mazzolini and H.-J. Rheinberger, 191–223. Bologna: Il Mulino/ Ducker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrame, L. 2013. “‘Sidestepping the Embryo’. The Cultural Meaning and Political Uses of Ethical Stem Cells.” Technoscienza 4 (1): 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• CNB (Comitato Nazionale per la Bioetica). 2000. “Parere del Comitato Nazionale per la Bioetica sull'impiego terapeutico delle cellule staminali.” Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.governo.it/bioetica/pdf/43.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CNB (Comitato Nazionale per la Bioetica). 2009. “Chimere ed ibridi. Con una riflessione particolare sugli ibridi citoplasmatici.” Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.governo.it/bioetica/pareri_abstract/chimere_ibridi_20090626.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation. Replies to Certain Questions of the Day.”  Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html
   Google Scholar
• De Coppi, P., G. Bartsch, M. Siddiqui, T. Xu, C. Santos, L. Perin, G. Mostoslavsky, et al. 2007. “Isolation of Amniotic Stem Cell Lines with Potential for Therapy.” Nature Biotechnology 25 (1): 100–106. doi: 10.1038/nbt1274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulbecco Report. 2000. “Relazione della commissione di studio sull'utilizzo di cellule staminali per finalità terapeutiche.” Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_bacheca_10_listaelencodocumenti_elenco1_listadocumenti_documento0_listafile_file0_linkfile.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. 2006. “Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3): 213–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 2001. “Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium.” Health 5 (3): 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 2005. “Stem Cells R Us: Emergent Life forms and the Global Biological.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by A. Ong and S. J. Collier, 59–78. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Geesink, I., B. Prainsack, and S. Franklin. 2008. “Stem Cell Stories 1998–2008.” Science as Culture 17 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1080/09505430801915448
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H., B. Salter, and C. Waldby. 2009. The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science. Regenerative Medicine in Transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, J., K. Saha, and R. Jaenisch. 2010. “Pluripotency and Cellular Reprogramming: Facts, Hypotheses, Unresolved Issues.” Cell 143 (4): 508–525. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, C., and S. Weber. 2011. “Framing Pluripotency: iPS Cells and the Shaping of Stem Cell Science.” New Genetics and Society 30 (4): 415–431. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.592007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A. 2010. “Bioethics and the Reinforcement of Socio-Technical Expectations.” Social Studies of Science 40 (2): 163–186. doi: 10.1177/0306312709349781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., and C. L. Bosk. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78. doi: 10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. “The Idiom of Co-Production.” In States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, edited by S. Jasanoff, 1–12. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., and C. Williams. 2005. “Forecasting Science Futures: Legitimising Hope and Calming Fears in the Embryo Stem Cell Debate.” Social Science & Medicine 61 (3): 731–740. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, J. 2006. “Human Eggs Supply ‘Ethical’ Stem Cells.” Nature 441 (7097): 1038. doi: 10.1038/4411038a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, A., and R. Jaenisch. 2006. “Generation of Nuclear Transfer-Derived Pluripotent ES Cells from Cloned Cdx2-Deficient Blastocysts.” Nature 439 (7073): 212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature04257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler, I. 2007. “‘Nationalizing Embryos’: The Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Italy.” BioSocieties 2 (4): 413–427. doi: 10.1017/S1745855207005856
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. 2010. “Public Bioethics and Public Engagement: The Politics of “Proper Talk”.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (2): 197–211. doi: 10.1177/0963662508096781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. 1994. “Changing Minds about Embryo Research.” Public Understanding of Science 3 (2): 195–213. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/3/2/004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., and B. V. Lewenstein. 2002. “Biotechnology and the American Media. The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999.” Science Communication 23 (4): 359–391. doi: 10.1177/107554700202300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., and G. Testa. 2010. Naked Genes. Reinventing Human in the Molecular Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oduncu, F. S. 2003. “Stem Cell Research in Germany: Ethics of Healing vs. Human Dignity.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.1023/A:1022585217710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paffoni, A., T. Brevini, E. Somigliana, L. Restelli, F. Gandolfi, and G. Ragni. 2007. “In Vitro Development of Human Oocytes after Parthenogenetic Activation or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.” Fertility and Sterility 87 (1): 77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., I. Geesink, and S. Franklin. 2008. “Stem Cell Technologies 1998–2008: Controversies and Silences.” Science as Culture 17 (4): 351–362. doi: 10.1080/09505430802514851
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, B. 2008. “Therapeutic Promise in the Discourse of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Science as Culture 17 (1): 13–27. doi: 10.1080/09505430701872962
   Google Scholar
• Rusconi, G. E. 2000. Come se Dio non ci fosse. I laici, i cattolici e la democrazia. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B. 2007. “Bioethics, Politics and the Moral Economy of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science: The Case of the European Union's Sixth Framework Programme.” New Genetics and Society 26 (3): 269–288. doi: 10.1080/14636770701718612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, B., and C. Salter. 2007. “Bioethics and the Global Moral Economy: The Cultural Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32 (5): 554–581. doi: 10.1177/0895904805303202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. 2011. “Regulating Cell Lives in Japan: Avoiding Scandal and Sticking to Nature.” New Genetics and Society 30 (3): 227–240. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.598052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K., K. Tanabe, M. Ohnuki, M. Narita, T. Ichisaka, K. Tomoda, S. Yamanaka. 2007. “Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors.” Cell 131 (5): 861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K., and S. Yamanaka. 2006. “Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors.” Cell 126 (4): 663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, G. 2008. “Stem Cells through Stem Beliefs: The Co-Production of Biotechnological Pluralism.” Science as Culture 17 (4): 435–448. doi: 10.1080/09505430802519199
   Google Scholar
• Testa, G. 2012. “Stem Cells and the Structuring of the Italian Biopolity.” In Differing Routes to Stem Cell Research: Germany and Italy, edited by R. G. Mazzolini and H.-J. Rheinberger, 225–249. Bologna: Il Mulino/Ducker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Toselli, M., E. Cerbai, F. Rossi, and E. Cattaneo. 2008. “Do Amniotic Fluid-Derived Stem Cells Differentiate into Neurons in Vitro?” Nature Biotechnology 26 (3): 269–270. doi: 10.1038/nbt0308-269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, S. P., C. Williams, M. Michael, B. Farsides, and A. Cribb. 2006. “Ethical Boundary-Work in the Embryonic Stem Cell Laboratory.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28 (6): 732–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00539.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, A. 2012. “Introduction: Bio-Objects: Exploring the Boundaries of Life.” In Bio-Objects. Life in the 21st Century, edited by N. Vermeulen, S. Tamminen and A. Webster, 1–10. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman, I. 2006. “Medicine: Politic Stem Cells.” Nature 439 (7073): 145–147. doi: 10.1038/439145a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., M. A. Vodyanik, K. Smuga-Otto, J. Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. L. Frane, S. Tian, J. Nie, et al. 2007. “Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells.” Science 318 (5858): 1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar