References
- Bonduriansky, R. 2012. “Rethinking Heredity, Again.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27 (6): 330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.003
- Crean, A. J., Kopps, A., and Bonduriansky, R. 2014. “Revisiting Telegony: Offspring Inherit an Acquired Characteristic of their Mother's Previous Mate.” Ecology Letters 17: 1545–1552. doi: 10.1111/ele.12373
- Gilbert, S. F. 2003. “The Reactive Genome.” In Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, edited by G. B. Muller and S. A. Newman, 87–101. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gliboff, S. 2005. “‘Protoplasm.is Soft Wax in our Hands’: Paul Kammerer and the Art of Biological Transformation.” Endeavour 29 (4): 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2005.10.001
- Gliboff, S. 2010. “Did Paul Kammerer Discover Epigenetic Inheritance? No and Why Not.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 314B: 616–624.
- Gordin, M. 2015. “Lysenko Unemployed: Soviet Genetics after the Aftermath.” Presentation at the Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, Princeton University, March 6.
- Griffiths, P., and K. Stotz. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hurd, P. 2010. “The Era of Epigenetics.” Briefings in Functional Genomics 9 (5–6): 425–428. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elq039
- Jablonka, E., and M. Lamb. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Keller, E. F. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.
- Keller, E. F. 2011. “Genes Genomes and Genomics.” Biological Theory 6: 132–140. doi: 10.1007/s13752-012-0014-x
- Liu, Y-S., and Q. L. Wang. 2011. “Michurin's Legacy to Biological science.” Journal of Bioscience 36 (1): 13–16. doi: 10.1007/s12038-011-9017-1
- Maderspacher, F. 2010. “Lysenko Rising.” Current Biology 20: 835–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.009
- Martens, J. H., H. G. Stunnenberg, and C. Logie. 2011. “The Decade of the Epigenomes?” Genes Cancer 2 (6): 680–687. doi: 10.1177/1947601911417860
- McClintock, B. 1984. “The Significance of Responses of the Genome to Challenge.” Science 226: 792–801. doi: 10.1126/science.15739260
- Meloni, M. forthcoming. Political Biology: Social Implications of Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Meloni, M., and G. Testa. 2014. “Scrutinizing the Epigenetics Revolution.” BioSocieties 9: 431–456. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.22
- Moore, D. S. 2015. The Developing Genome: An Introduction to Behavioural Epigenetics. Oxford: OUP.
- Pennisi, E. 2009. “The Case of the Midwife Toad: Fraud or Epigenetics?” Science 325 (5945): 1194–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.325_1194
- Reynolds, G. 2014. “How Exercise Changes Our DNA.” New York Times, December 17.
- Roll-Hansen, N. 2011. “Lamarckism and Lysenkoism Revisited.” In Transformations of Lamarckism, edited by S. B. Gissis and E. Jablonka, 77–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Sapp, J. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Tollefsbol, T. 2011. Handbook of Epigenetics. The New Molecular and Medical Genetics. London: Elsevier.
- Vargas, A. O. 2009. “Did Paul Kammerer Discover Epigenetic Inheritance? A Modern Look at the Controversial Midwife Toad Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B (Molecular Development and Evolution) 312B: 667–678. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21319
- Wagner, G. P. 2009. “Paul Kammerer's Midwife Toads: About the Reliability of Experiments and Our Ability to Make Sense of Them.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B (Molecular Development and Evolution) 312B: 665–666. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21324
- Weissmann, G. 2010. “The Midwife Toad and Alma Mahler: Epigenetics or a Matter of Deception?” The FASEB Journal 24 (8): 2591–2595. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-0801ufm