Biobanks and the reconfiguration of the living

Références

• Angé, Olivia, and Perig Pitrou. 2016. “Miniatures in Mesoamerica and the Andes: Theories of Life, Values, and Relatedness” Journal of Anthropological Research 72 (4): 408–415. doi: 10.1086/689259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnreuther, Sandra. 2018. “Suitable Substances: How Biobanks (Re)Store Biologicals.” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1546572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bioy, Xavier, ed. 2018. Public Regulation of Tumor Banks. Establishment, Heritage Status, Development and Sharing of Human Biological Samples. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coupaye, Ludovic. 2013. Growing Artefacts, Displaying Relationships: Yams, Art and Technology Amongst the Nyamikum Abelam of Papua New Guinea. New-York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Coupaye, Ludovic, and Perig Pitrou. 2018. “Introduction. The Interweaving of Vital and Technical Processes in Oceania.” Oceania 88 (1): 2–12. doi:10.1002/ocea.5178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromer, Risa. 2017. “Waiting. The Redemption of Frozen Embryos Through Embryo Adoption and Stem Cell Research in the United States.” In The Anthropology of the Fetus: Biology, Culture, and Society, edited by Sallie Han, Tracy K. Betsinger, and Amy B. Scott, 171–199. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cromer, Risa. 2018. “Saving Embryos in Stem Cell Science and Embryo Adoption.” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1546574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagognet, François. 1988. La maîtrise du vivant. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrich, Kathryn, Clare Williams, and Bobbie Farsides. 2010. “Fresh or Frozen? Classifying ‘Spare’ Embryos for Donation to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Social Science & Medicine 71 (12): 2204–2211. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Lena, and Andrew Webster. 2008. “Standardizing the Unknown: Practicable Pluripotency as Doable Futures.” Science as Culture 17 (1): 57–69. doi: 10.1080/09505430701872814
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Lena, and Andrew Webster. 2015. “Standardizing Work as a Recursive Process: Shaping the Embryonic Stem Cell Field.” New Genetics and Society 34 (1): 72–88. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2014.998818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah. 2006. “Embryonic Economies: The Double Reproductive Value of Stem Cells.” BioSocieties 1 (1): 71–90. doi: 10.1017/S1745855205040081
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah, and Margaret M. Lock. 2003. Remaking Life & Death : Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. 1st ed. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press; James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, Stefan. 2008. “Species of Biocapital.” Science as Culture 17 (4): 463–478. doi: 10.1080/09505430802519256
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, Stefan. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, Stefan. 2015. Sounding the Limits of Life. Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kac, Eduardo, ed. 2007. Signs of Life: Bioart and Beyond, Leonardo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio. 2003. Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-Twentieth-Century Medicine, Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Jieun. 2018. “The Specter of “Bad Blood” in Japanese Blood Banks.” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1546575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoppers, Bartha, Rex L. Chisholm, Jane Kaye, David Cox, Adrian Thorogood, Paul Burton, Anthony J. Brookes, et al. 2013. “A P3G Generic Access Agreement for Population Genomic Studies.” Nature Biotechnology 31 (5): 384–385. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landecker, Hannah. 2007. Culturing Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, Margaret M. 2002. Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death, California Series in Public Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Noémie. 2016. “‪Sexualité et conception assistée en Inde et en France.” Journal des Anthropologues 144–145 (1): 101–122. doi: 10.4000/jda.6382
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Noémie. 2017. “Féconder in vitro dans des laboratoires en Inde et en France. Une somatotechnique?” Ethnologie française 167 (3): 509–518. doi: 10.3917/ethn.173.0509
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Noémie. 2018. “Sélectionner des embryons humains. Une relation opératoire au sein de laboratoires de biologie de la reproduction en Inde et en France.” L'Homme 225 (1): 101–124. doi: 10.4000/lhomme.30724
   Google Scholar
• Meskus, Mianna. 2018. Craft in Biomedical Research. New-York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien. 2008. La socialisation des tumeurs cancéreuses. Une enquête sociologique des tumorothèques françaises Rapport de recherche, Inserm U558, Toulouse (France), research funded by INCa.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien. 2011. “Biological Resources.” Introduction to the special issue. Revue D'anthropologie des Connaissances 5 (2): a–q. doi: 10.3917/rac.013.0190
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien. 2018a. “Socializing Tumors. From the Conservation of Tumors in Banks to Their Ontological Variations.” In Public Regulation of Tumor Banks. Establishment, Heritage Status, Development and Sharing of Human Biological Samples, edited by Xavier Bioy, 73–84. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien. 2018b. “Socialiser le vivant tumoral. Episode 2 : Des modes d’existence des collections d’échantillons biologiques.” In La régulation publique des centres de ressources biologiques. Le cas des tumorothèques, edited by Xavier Bioy, 117–130. Bordeaux: LEH édition.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien, and François Lefèvre. 2018. “Biobanking in Forestry Practices: Towards an Agency Policy?” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1548270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien and David Pontille. 2007. “Quand les règles ne suffisent pas: heurs et malheurs du travail réglementaire.” Sciences Sociales et Santé 25 (3): 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien, Noémie Merleau-Ponty, and Perig Pitrou. 2017. Biobanques: quelles reconfigurations pour le vivant? Approches interdisciplinaires. Natures Sciences Sociétés 25 (3): 268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Fabien, David Pontille, and Anne Cambon-Thomsen. 2007. “Biobanking and Data Sharing: a Plurality of Exchange Regimes.” Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1): 17. doi: 10.1186/1746-5354-3-1-17
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Science and Cultural Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Noémie, Sigrid Vertommen, and Michel Pucéat. 2018. “I6 Passages: On the Reproduction of a Human Embryonic Stem Cell Line from Israel to France.” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1548269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pálsson, Gísli. 2007. Anthropology and the New Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pálsson, Gísli. 2009. “Biosocial Relations of Production.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51 (02): 288–313. doi: 10.1017/S0010417509000139
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, Perig. 2017a. “Life as a Making.” Natureculture no. 4: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, Perig. 2017b. “Life Form and Form of Life Within an Agentive Configuration: A Birth Ritual among the Mixe of Oaxaca, Mexico.” Current Anthropology 58 (7): 360–380. doi: 10.1086/692027
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, Perig, Ludovic Coupaye, and Fabien Provost, eds. 2016. Des êtres vivants et des artefacts. L’imbrication des processus vitaux et des processus techniques. Paris: Les actes de colloque du musée du quai Branly. https://actesbranly.revues.org/647.
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, Perig, Johannes Neurath, and María del Carmen Valverde, eds. 2011. La noción de vida en Mesoamérica. Mexico: CEMCA, IIFL, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul. 2010. “L’artifice et les Lumières : de la sociobiologie à la biosocialité.” Politix 90 (2): 31–46. doi: 10.3917/pox.090.0021
   Google Scholar
• Radin, Joanna, and Emma Kowal. 2017. Cryopolitics: Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, Kaushik Sunder. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies, Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Allen, Adrian. 2018. “Pinning Beetles, Biobanking Futures: Practices of Archiving Life in a Time of Extinction.” New Genetics and Society. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1546573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, Niki, Sakari Tamminen, and Andrew Webster. 2012. Bio-Objects: Life in the 21st Century. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, Catherine, and Robert Mitchell. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Andrew. 2012. “Bio-Objects: Exploring the Boundaries of Life.” In BioObjects: Life in the 21st Century, edited by Niki Vermeulen, Sakari Tamminen, and Andrew Webster, 1–10. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar