Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 40, 2021 - Issue 3
594
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Translating cell biology of ageing? On the importance of choreographing knowledge

Pages 267-283 | Received 23 Mar 2020, Accepted 15 Sep 2020, Published online: 26 Sep 2020

References

  • Addison, C. 2017. “Bench, Bedside, Boardroom: Negotiating Translational Gene Therapy.” New Genetics and Society 36 (1): 22–42. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2017.1289468
  • Bakalar, N. 2018. “How Long Can People Live?” New York Times, November 18.
  • Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bergson, H. 2007. Creative Evolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Boltanski, L., and L. Thevenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Brosnan, C., and M. Michael. 2014. “Enacting the ‘Neuro’ in Practice: Translational Research, Adhesion and the Promise of Porosity.” Social Studies of Science 44 (5): 680–700. doi: 10.1177/0306312714534333
  • Caliskan, K., and M. Callon. 2010. “Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme for the Study of Markets.” Economy and Society 39 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1080/03085140903424519
  • Campisi, J., P. Kapahi, G. J. Lithgow, S. Melov, J. C. Newman, and E. Verdin. 2019. “From Discoveries in Ageing Research to Therapeutics for Healthy Ageing.” Nature 571 (7764): 183–192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1365-2
  • Clarke, A. E. 2016. “Anticipation Work: Abduction, Simplification, Hope.” In Boundary Objects and Beyond, edited by G. Bowker, S. Timmermans, A. Clarke, and E. Balka, 85–120. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Coopmans, C., J. Vertesi, M. E. Lynch, and S. Woolgar, eds. 2014. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Coppe, J. P., P. Y. Desprez, A. Krtolica, and J. Campisi. 2010. “The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: the Dark Side of Tumor Suppression.” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease 5: 99–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144
  • Cussins, C. 1998. “Ontological Choreography: Agency for Women Patients in an Infertility Clinic.” In Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, and Bodies, edited by M. Berg and A. Mol, 166–201. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Deursen, J. M. 2014. “The Role of Senescent Cells in Ageing.” Nature 509 (7501): 439–446. doi: 10.1038/nature13193
  • Deursen, J. M. 2019. “Senolytic Therapies for Healthy Longevity.” Science 364 (6441): 636–637. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1299
  • Doing, P. 2008. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise a Discipline: The Past, Present, and Future of Laboratory Studies in STS.” In Handbook of Science & Technology Studies. 3rd ed., edited by E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 279–295. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Dussange, I., C. F. Helgesson, and F. Lee. 2015. Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Biomedicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Felt, U., B. Wynne, A. Stirling, M. Callon, and M. E. Goncalves. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science. Economy and Society Directorate Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fleming, A. 2019. “The Science of Senolytics: How a New Pill Could Spell the End of Ageing.” The Guardian, September 13.
  • Gardner, J., and A. Webster. 2017. “Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (5): 925–946. doi: 10.1177/0162243917702720
  • Hayden, E. 2015. “Ageing Pushed as Treatable Condition.” Nature 522: 265–266. doi: 10.1038/522265a
  • Herranz, N., and J. Gil. 2018. “Mechanisms and Functions of Cellular Senescence.” The Journal of Clinical Investigation 128 (4): 1238–1246. doi: 10.1172/JCI95148
  • Katz, J. 2002. “From How to Why: On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography.” Ethnography 3 (1): 63–90. doi: 10.1177/1466138102003001003
  • Keating, P., and A. Cambrosio. 2013. “21st-Century Oncology: A Tangled Web.” The Lancet 382 (9909): e45–e46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62660-4
  • Kirkland, J. L., T. Tchkonia, Y. Zhu, L. J. Niedernhofer, and P. D. Robbins. 2017. “The Clinical Potential of Senolytic Drugs.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 65 (10): 2297–2301. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14969
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. K. 1997. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. 1988. “Irréductions.” In The Pasteurisation of France, edited by B. Latour. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Lewis, J., J. Hughes, and P. Atkinson. 2014. “Relocation, Realignment and Standardisation: Circuits of Translation in Huntington’s Disease.” Social Theory & Health 12 (4): 396–415. doi: 10.1057/sth.2014.13
  • Lynch, M. 1991. “Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures.” Science in Context 4 (1): 51–78. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700000156
  • Lynch, M., and S. Woolgar. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Maienschein, J., M. Sunderland, R. A. Ankeny, and J. S. Robert. 2008. “The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research.” The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3): 43–51. doi: 10.1080/15265160802109314
  • Martin, P., N. Brown, and A. Kraft. 2008. “From Bedside to Bench? Communities of Promise, Translational Research and the Making of Blood Stem Cells.” Science as Culture 17 (1): 29–41. doi: 10.1080/09505430701872921
  • Martin, A., and M. Lynch. 2009. “Counting Things and People: The Practices and Politics of Counting.” Social Problems 56 (2): 243–266. doi: 10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.243
  • Miller, R. A. 2002. “Extending Life: Scientific Prospects and Political Obstacles.” The Milbank Quarterly 80 (1): 155–174. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00006
  • Mittra, J. 2013. “Repairing the ‘Broken Middle’ of the Health Innovation Pathway: Exploring Diverse Practitioner Perspectives on the Emergence and Role of ‘Translational Medicine’.” Science and Technology Studies 26 (3): 103–123. doi: 10.23987/sts.55290
  • Moreira, T. 2017. Science, Technology and the Ageing Society. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Moreira, T. 2000. “Translation, Difference and Ontological Fluidity: Cerebral Angiography and Neurosurgical Practice (1926–45).” Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 421–446. doi: 10.1177/030631200030003004
  • Nelson, N. C., P. Keating, A. Cambrosio, A. Aguilar-Mahecha, and M. Basik. 2014. “Testing Devices or Experimental Systems? Cancer Clinical Trials Take the Genomic Turn.” Social Science & Medicine 111: 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.008
  • Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Porter, T. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Stengers, I. 1997. Power and Invention: Situating Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Vos, R. 1991. Drugs Looking for Diseases. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Ziewitz, M., and M. Lynch. 2018. “It’s Important to Go to the Laboratory.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 366–385. doi: 10.17351/ests2018.220

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.