Long-range familial searches in recreational DNA databases: expansion of affected populations, the participatory turn, and the co-production of biovalue

References

• Aas, Katja F. 2011. “‘Crimmigrant’ Bodies and Bona Fide Travelers: Surveillance, Citizenship and Global Governance.” Theoretical Criminology 15 (3): 331–346. doi:10.1177/1362480610396643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, Sarah, and Krystal S. Tsosie. 2019. “Family History and the Global Politics of DNA.” International Public History 2 (2): 1–3. doi:10.1515/iph-2019-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Abu El-Haj, Nadia. 2012. The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amelung, Nina, Rafaela Granja, and Helena Machado. 2020. Modes of Bio-Bordering: The Hidden (Dis)Integration of Europe. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Carrie. 2020. “Crime Fighting with Family Trees.” Nature 585: 893–903.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, Jay. 2007. Genetic Witness: Science, Law, and Controversy in the Making of DNA Profiling. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Jo, Yu-Wei Lin, and Paula Goodale. 2016. “Data Journeys: Capturing the Socio-Material Constitution of Data Objects and Flows.” Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951716654502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, Benjamin E., Wynter K. Miller, and Christine Grady. 2018. “Is It Ethical to Use Genealogy Data to Solve Crimes?” Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (5): 333. doi:10.7326/m18-1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biometrics and Forensics Ethics Group. 2020. “Should We Be Making Use of Genetic Genealogy to Assist in Solving Crime? A Report on the Feasibility of Such Methods in the UK.”.
   Google Scholar
• Borry, Pascal, Martina C. Cornel, and Heidi C. Howard. 2010. “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been: A Recent History of the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Market.” Journal of Community Genetics 1 (3): 101–106. doi:10.1007/s12687-010-0023-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chow-White, Peter, Stephan Struve, Alberto Lusoli, Frederik Lesage, Nilesh Saraf, and Amanda Oldring. 2018. “‘Warren Buffet Is My Cousin’: Shaping Public Understanding of Big Data Biotechnology, Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, and 23andMe on Twitter.” Information Communication and Society 21 (3): 448–464. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1285951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, Simon. 2007. “Is the ‘Junk’ DNA Designation Bunk?” Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 102 (2006): 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, Caitlin, James Hereward, Marie Mangelsdorf, Karen Hussey, and John Devereux. 2018. “Protecting Trust in Medical Genetics in the New Era of Forensics.” Genetics in Medicine, 3–5. doi:10.1038/s41436-018-0396-7.
   Google Scholar
• Debus-Sherrill, Sara, and Michael B. Field. 2019. “Familial DNA Searching- an Emerging Forensic Investigative Tool.” Science & Justice 59 (1): 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2018.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derksen, Linda. 2003. “Agency and Structure in the History of DNA Profiling: The Stabilization and Standardization of a New Technology.” University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Derksen, Linda. 2010. “Micro/Macro Translations: The Production of New Social Structures in the Case of DNA Profiling.” Sociological Inquiry 80 (2): 214–240. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2010.00328.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettlaff-Kakol, A., and R. Pawlowski. 2002. “First Polish DNA ‘Manhunt’–an Application of Y-Chromosome STRs.” International Journal of Legal Medicine 116 (5): 289–291. doi:10.1007/s00414-002-0320-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duster, Troy. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erlich, Yaniv, Tal Shor, Itsik Pe’er, and Shai Carmi. 2018. “Identity Inference of Genomic Data Using Long-Range Familial Searches.” Science 362 (6415): 690–694. doi:10.1126/science.aau4832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaus, Alexandra. 2013. Familial Searches and the New Zealand DNA Profile Databank : The Thin Edge of the Genetic Wedge?
   Google Scholar
• Granja, Rafaela, and Helena Machado. 2019. “Ethical Controversies of Familial Searching: The Views of Stakeholders in the United Kingdom and in Poland.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (6): 1068–1092. doi:10.1177/0162243919828219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja, Rafaela, and Helena Machado. 2020. “Forensic DNA Phenotyping and Its Politics of Legitimation and Contestation: Views of Forensic Geneticists in Europe.” Social Studies of Science, 1–27. doi:10.1177/0306312720945033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja, Rafaela, Helena Machado, and Filipa Queirós. 2020. “The (De)Materialization of Criminal Bodies in Forensic DNA Phenotyping.” Body & Society, 1–25. doi:10.1177/1357034X20919168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, Katherine. 2019. “Contestable Kinship: User Experience and Engagement on DTC Genetic Testing Sites.” New Genetics and Society 38 (4): 387–409. doi:10.1080/14636778.2019.1677148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, Christi J., Jill O. Robinson, Devan Petersen, and Amy L. McGuire. 2018. “Should Police Have Access to Genetic Genealogy Databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and Other Criminals Using a Controversial New Forensic Technique.” PLoS Biology 16 (10): e2006906. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes, Erica. 2006. “Social and Ethical Issues in the Use of Familial Searching in Forensic Investigations: Insights from Family and Kinship Studies.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2): 263–276. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00032.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Anna, Sally Wyatt, and Susan E. Kelly. 2013. “THE GIFT OF SPIT (AND THE OBLIGATION TO RETURN IT): How Consumers of Online Genetic Testing Services Participate in Research.” Information Communication and Society 16 (2): 236–257. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.701656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack. 2010. Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Adam L., Aliya Saperstein, Jasmine Little, Martin Maiers, and Jill A. Hollenbach. 2019. “Consumer (Dis-)Interest in Genetic Ancestry Testing: The Roles of Race, Immigration, and Ancestral Certainty.” New Genetics and Society, 1–30. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1562327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. “Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2): 328–341. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Tobias. 2015. “The Murder That Has Obsessed Italy.” The Guardian, January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kalokairinou, L., H. C. Howard, S. Slokenberga, E. Fisher, M. Flatscher-Thöni, M. Hartlev, R. van Hellemondt, et al. 2018. “Legislation of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in Europe: A Fragmented Regulatory Landscape.” Journal of Community Genetics 9 (2): 117–132. doi:10.1007/s12687-017-0344-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsanis, Sara H. 2020. “Pedigrees and Perpetrators: Uses of DNA and Genealogy in Forensic Investigations.” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 21 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-111819-084213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennett, Debbie. 2019. “Using Genetic Genealogy Databases in Missing Persons Cases and to Develop Suspect Leads in Violent Crimes.” Forensic Science International 301: 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Joyce, Danny Mammo, Marni B Siegel, and Sara H Katsanis. 2011. “Policy Implications for Familial Searching.” Investigative Genetics 2 (1): 22. doi:10.1186/2041-2223-2-22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawless, Christopher. 2011. “Policing Markets: The Contested Shaping of Neo-Liberal Forensic Science.” British Journal of Criminology 51 (4): 671–689. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, Christopher. 2013. “The Low Template DNA Profiling Controversy: Biolegality and Boundary Work among Forensic Scientists.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 191–214. doi:10.1177/0306312712465665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, Sabina, and Niccolò Tempini. 2020. Data Journeys in the Sciences. Data Journeys in the Sciences. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael, Simon Cole, Ruth McNally, and Kathleen Jordan. 2008. Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael, and Ruth McNally. 2009. “Forensic DNA Databases and Biolegality: The Co-Production of Law, Surveillance Technology and Suspect Bodies.” In Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomics Era, edited by Paul Atkinson, Peter Glasner, and Margaret Lock, 283–301. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Rafaela Granja. 2018. “Ethics in Transnational Forensic DNA Data Exchange in the EU: Constructing Boundaries and Managing Controversies.” Science as Culture 27 (2): 242–264. doi:10.1080/09505431.2018.1425385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Rafaela Granja. 2019. “Police Epistemic Culture and Boundary Work with Judicial Authorities and Forensic Scientists: The Case of Transnational DNA Data Exchange in the EU.” New Genetics and Society 38 (3): 289–307. doi:10.1080/14636778.2019.1609350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Rafaela Granja. 2020. Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2429-5.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, Rafaela Granja, and Nina Amelung. 2020. “Constructing Suspicion through Forensic DNA Databases in the EU. The Views of the Prüm Professionals.” The British Journal of Criminology 60 (1): 141–159. doi:10.1093/bjc/azz057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Silva. 2008. “A Portuguese Perspective.” BioSocieties 3 (1): 99–101. doi:10.1017/S1745855208006017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Silva. 2009. “Informed Consent in Forensic DNA Databases: Volunteering, Constructions of Risk and Identity Categorization.” BioSocieties 4: 335–348. doi:10.1017/S1745855209990329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Silva. 2015. “Public Participation in Genetic Databases: Crossing the Boundaries between Biobanks and Forensic DNA Databases through the Principle of Solidarity.” Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (10): 820–824. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Silva. 2016. “Voluntary Participation in Forensic DNA Databases: Altruism, Resistance, and Stigma.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (2): 322–343. doi:10.1177/0162243915604723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, C. N., L. A. McCallum, C. Storey, and J. P. Whitaker. 2014. “Familial Searching: A Specialist Forensic DNA Profiling Service Utilising the National DNA Database® to Identify Unknown Offenders via Their Relatives—The UK Experience.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 8 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’charek, Amade. 2008. “Silent Witness, Articulate Collective: DNA Evidence and the Inference of Visible Traits.” Bioethics 22 (9): 519–528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00699.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Robert, and Catherine Waldby. 2010. “National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (3): 330–355. doi:10.1177/0162243909340267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Erin. 2010. “Relative Doubt: Familial Searches of DNA Databases.” Michigan Law Review 109 (3): 291–348. doi:10.2307/25759291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Erin. 2018. “Law and Policy Oversight of Familial Searches in Recreational Genealogy Databases.” Forensic Science International 292: e5–e9. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novas, Carlos, and Nikolas Rose. 2000. “Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual.” Economy and Society 29 (4): 485–513. doi:10.1080/03085140050174750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Andelka M. 2016. “‘Only a Click Away — DTC Genetics for Ancestry, Health, Love … and More: A View of the Business and Regulatory Landscape’.” Applied and Translational Genomics 8: 16–22. doi:10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips, Chris. 2018. “The Golden State Killer Investigation and the Nascent Field of Forensic Genealogy.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 36: 186–188. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Tracey Brown, Peter M. Schneider, Linda Geddes, Denise Syndercombe-Court, Peter Gill, Joanne Thomas, et al. 2017. “Making Sense of Forensic Genetics.” London. http://senseaboutscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Making-Sense-of-Forensic-Genetics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara. 2011. “Voting with Their Mice: Personal Genome Testing and the ‘Participatory Turn’ in Disease Research.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 18 (3): 132–147. doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.575032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara, and Victor Toom. 2010. “The Prum Regime: Situated Dis/Empowerment in Transnational DNA Profile Exchange.” British Journal of Criminology 50 (6): 1117–1135. doi:10.1093/bjc/azq055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara, and Victor Toom. 2013. “Performing the Union: The Prüm Decision and the European Dream.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1): 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ram, Natalie. 2008. “Tiered Consent and the Tyranny of Choice.” Jurimetrics Journal of Law, Science and Technology 48 (3): 253.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, Natalie, Christi J. Guerrini, and Amy L. Mcguire. 2018. “Genealogy Databases and the Future of Criminal Investigation.” Science 360 (6393): 1078–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, Aviad E., Emilia Niemiec, Heidi C. Howard, Sigrid Sterckx, Julian Cockbain, and Barbara Prainsack. 2020. “Transparency, Consent and Trust in the Use of Customers’ Data by an Online Genetic Testing Company: An Exploratory Survey among 23andMe Users.” New Genetics and Society, 1–24. doi:10.1080/14636778.2020.1755636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, Sarah. 2018. “Canada Still Isn’t Using a Leading Forensic Technique to Solve Crimes — Here’s Why.” CBC, December 7, 2018. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/rockne-harmon-dna-1.4549629.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 2000. “The Biology of Culpability: Pathological Identity and Crime Control in a Biological Culture.” Theoretical Criminology 4 (1): 5–34. doi:10.1177/1362480600004001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas. 2005. “Biological Citizenship.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Stephen J. Collier, and Aihwa Ong, 439–463. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, Gabrielle, and Debbie Kennett. 2020. “The Impact of Investigative Genetic Genealogy: Perceptions of UK Professional and Public Stakeholders.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 48. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, Gabrielle, and Barbara Prainsack. 2019. “Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Europe: Views ‘on the Ground’ from Those Who Have a Professional Stake in the Technology.” New Genetics and Society 38 (2): 119–141. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1549984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeva, Sevasti, Maarten H.D. Larmuseau, and Mahsa Shabani. 2020. “Review of Policies of Companies and Databases Regarding Access to Customers’ Genealogy Data for Law Enforcement Purposes.” Personalized Medicine 17 (2): 141–153. doi:10.2217/pme-2019-0100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, David. 2013. “‘The NDNAD Has No Ability in Itself to Be Discriminatory’: Ethnicity and the Governance of the UK National DNA Database.” Sociology 47 (5): 976–992. doi:10.1177/0038038513493539.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, David, and Matthias Wienroth. 2019. “Was This an Ending? The Destruction of Samples and Deletion of Records from the UK Police National DNA Database.” BJHS Themes, 1–23. doi:10.1017/bjt.2019.7.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, Sonia M. 2010. “All in the Family: Privacy and DNA Familial Searching.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 23 (2): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Syndercombe-Court, Denise. 2018. “Forensic Genealogy: Some Serious Concerns.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 36: 203–204. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Laura. 2006. “Nothing to Hide, Something to Fear?: The Use of Partial DNA Matching in Criminal Investigations.” Journal of Law, Information and Science 17: 72–93.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Jim, Tim Clayton, John Cleary, Maurice Gleeson, Debbie Kennett, Michelle Leonard, and Donna Rutherford. 2020. “An Empirical Investigation into the Effectiveness of Genetic Genealogy to Identify Individuals in the UK.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 46: 102263. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, Richard. 2004. “‘They Want to Know Where They Came from’: Population Genetics, Identity, and Family Genealogy.” New Genetics and Society 23 (1): 105–120. doi:10.1080/1463677042000189606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack. 2011. “Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making up Research Subjects in Genetics Research.” Sociology of Health and Illness 33 (7): 1081–1095. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice. 2019. “Interim Policy Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Aanalysis and Searching,” 1–8. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Vidaki, Athina, and Manfred Kayser. 2017. “From Forensic Epigenetics to Forensic Epigenomics: Broadening DNA Investigative Intelligence.” Genome Biology 18 (1): 238. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidaki, Athina, and Manfred Kayser. 2018. “Recent Progress, Methods and Perspectives in Forensic Epigenetics.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 180–195. doi:10.1016/J.FSIGEN.2018.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, Catherine. 2002a. “Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality.” Feminist Theory 3 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1177/146470002762491980.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, Catherine. 2002b. “Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue.” Health 6 (3): 305–323. doi:10.1177/136345930200600304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenheiser, Ray A. 2019. “Forensic Genealogy, Bioethics and the Golden State Killer Case.” Forensic Science International: Synergy 1: 114–125. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.07.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wienroth, Matthias. 2018. “Governing Anticipatory Technology Practices. Forensic DNA Phenotyping and the Forensic Genetics Community in Europe.” New Genetics and Society 37 (2): 137–152. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1469975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienroth, Matthias. 2020. “Socio-Technical Disagreements as Ethical Fora: Parabon NanoLab’s Forensic DNA SnapshotTM Service at the Intersection of Discourses around Robust Science, Technology Validation, and Commerce.” BioSocieties 15 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1057/s41292-018-0138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienroth, Matthias, Niels Morling, and Robin Williams. 2014. “Technological Innovations in Forensic Genetics: Social, Legal and Ethical Aspects.” Recent Advances in DNA and Gene Sequences 8 (2): 98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. L., A. Magora, M. Garcia, and A. Khurana. 2009. “Fathering at the Margins of Society: Reflections from Young, Minority, Crime-Involved Fathers.” Journal of Family Issues 30 (7): 945–967. doi:10.1177/0192513X09332354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Robin. 2010. “DNA Databases and the Forensic Imaginary.” In Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of DNA Profiling and Databasing, edited by Richard Hindmarsh, and Barbara Prainsack, 131–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Robin, and Paul Johnson. 2004. “Circuits of Surveillance.” Surveillance & Society 2 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.2-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, Robin, and Paul Johnson. 2008. Genetic Policing: The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar