Strategy influences directional control–response compatibility: evidence from an underground coal mine shuttle car simulation

References

• Ansorge, U. 2002. “Spatial Intention-Response Compatibility.” Acta Psychologica 109: 285–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., and O. Neumann. 2005. “Intentions Determine the Effect of Invisible Metacontrast-Masked Primes: Evidence for Top-Down Contingencies in a Peripheral Cuing Task.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31: 762–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Limerick, R., V. Krupenia, G. Wallis, A. Pratim-Bannerjee, and L. Steiner. 2010. “Directional Control-Response Relationships for Mining Equipment.” Ergonomics 53: 748–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Limerick, R., C. Zupanc, and G. Wallis. 2012. “Directional Control-Response Compatibility of Joystick Steered Shuttle Cars.” Ergonomics 55: 1278–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Limerick, R., C. Zupanc, and G. Wallis. 2013. “Effect of Control Order on Steering a Simulated Underground Coal Shuttle Car.” Applied Ergonomics 44: 225–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, R., D.J. Weeks, K.L. Ricker, and P. Poon. 2001. “Influence of Operator Orientation on Relative Organisational Mapping and Spatial Compatibility.” Ergonomics 44: 751–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, A., and R.W. Proctor. 1992. “Persistence of Stimulus-Response Compatibility with Extended Practice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18: 801–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P.M., and M.I. Posner. 1967. Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P.M., and C.M. Seeger. 1953. “S-R Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 46: 199–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glück, J., and S. Fitting. 2003. “Spatial Strategy Selection: Interesting Incremental Information.” International Journal of Testing 3: 293–308.
   Google Scholar
• Guiard, Y. 1983. “The Lateral Coding of Rotations: A Study of the Simon Effect with Wheel-Rotation Responses.” Journal of Motor Behavior 15: 331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. 1993. “Inverting the Simon Effect by Intention.” Psychological Research 55: 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. 2007. “Feature Integration Across Perception and Action: Event Files Affect Response Choice.” Psychological Research 71: 42–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. 2001. “The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A Framework for Perception and Action Planning.” Behavioral & Brain Sciences 24: 849–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. 2009. “Action Control According to TEC (Theory of Event Coding).” Psychological Research 73: 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., T. Hasbroucq, and A. Osman. 1990. “Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility – A Model and Taxonomy.” Psychological Review 97: 253–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D.F., and P.C. Kyllonen. 1983. “Individual Differences in Solution Strategy on Spatial Tasks.” In Individual Differences in Cognition, edited by D.F. Dillon and R.R. Schmeck, 105–135. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, N.E. 1962. “Direction-of-Motion Stereotypes: A Review.” Ergonomics 5: 357–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., and B. Hommel. 2005. “Attention, Instruction, and Response Representation.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17: 674–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., and B. Hommel. 2006. “Tailoring Perception and Action to the Task at Hand.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18: 579–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R.W., and T.G. Reeve. 1990. Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R.W., D-Y.D. Wang, and D.F. Pick. 2004. “Stimulus-Response Compatibility with Wheel-Rotation Responses: Will an Incompatible Response Coding be Used When a Compatible Coding is Possible?” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11: 841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, L., R. Burgess-Limerick, and W. Porter. 2013. “Directional Control-Response Compatibility Relationships Assessed by Physical Simulation of an Underground Bolting Machine.” Human Factors. doi:10.1177/0018720813490953
   Google Scholar
• Stins, J.F., and C.F. Michaels. 1997. “Stimulus-Response Compatibility is Information-Action Compatibility.” Ecological Psychology 9: 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D.-Y.D., R.W. Proctor, and D.F. Pick. 2003. “The Simon Effect with Wheel-Rotation Responses.” Journal of Motor Behavior 35: 261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D.-Y.D., R.W. Proctor, and D.F. Pick. 2007. “Coding Controlled and Triggered Cursor Movements as Action Effects: Influences on the Auditory Simon Effect for Wheel-Rotation Responses.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33: 657–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenke, D., R. Gaschler, and D. Nattkemper. 2007. “Instruction-Induced Feature Binding.” Psychological Research 71: 92–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanc, C.M., R. Burgess-Limerick, and G. Wallis. 2007. “Performance Consequences of Alternating Directional Control-Response Compatibility: Evidence from a Coal Mine Shuttle Car Simulator.” Human Factors 49: 628–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanc, C., R. Burgess-Limerick, and G. Wallis. 2011. “Effect of Age on Learning to Drive a Virtual Coal Mine Shuttle Car.” The Ergonomics Open Journal 4(Suppl. 2-M1): 112–124.
   Google Scholar