2,961
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interrelationships among predictors of automated vehicle acceptance: a structural equation modelling approach

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 383-408 | Received 10 Jan 2020, Accepted 20 Aug 2020, Published online: 09 Nov 2020

References

  • Acheampong, R.A., and F. Cugurullo. 2019. “Capturing the Behavioural Determinants behind the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles: Conceptual Frameworks and Measurement Models to Predict Public Transport, Sharing and Ownership Trends of Self-Driving Cars.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 62: 349–375.
  • Adams, D.A., R.R. Nelson, and P.A. Todd. 1992. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication.” MIS Quarterly 16 (2): 227–247. doi:10.2307/249577.
  • Anable, J., and B. Gatersleben. 2005. “All Work and No Play? The Role of Instrumental and Affective Factors in Work and Leisure Journeys by Different Travel Modes.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (2-3): 163–181. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.008.
  • Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
  • Asgari, H., and X. Jin. 2019. “Incorporating Attitudinal Factors to Examine Adoption of and Willingness to Pay for Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Record 2673: 1–12.
  • Backhaus, K., B. Erichson, and R. Weiber. 2015. "Neuronale Netze." Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden. 10: 295–347.
  • Bagley, M.N., and P.L. Mokhtarian. 2002. “The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach.” The Annals of Regional Science 36 (2): 279–297. doi:10.1007/s001680200083.
  • Bansal, P., and K.M. Kockelman. 2018. “Are we Ready to Embrace Connected and Self-Driving Vehicles? a Case Study of Texans.” Transportation 45 (2): 641–675. doi:10.1007/s11116-016-9745-z.
  • Bansal, P., K.M. Kockelman, and A. Singh. 2016. “Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 67: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019.
  • Beiker, S.A. 2019. “Deployment of Automated Driving as an Example for the San Francisco Bay Area.” In Road Vehicle Automation 5, edited by G. Meyer and S. Beiker, 117–129. Springer, Cham.
  • Beirão, G., and J.A. Sarsfield Cabral. 2007. “Understanding Attitudes towards Public Transport and Private Car: A Qualitative Study.” Transport Policy 14 (6): 478–489. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009.
  • Berliner, R.M., S. Hardman, and G. Tal. 2019. “Uncovering Early Adopters' Perceptions and Purchase Intentions of Automated Vehicles: Insights from Early Adopters of Electric Vehicles in California.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60: 712–722. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.010.
  • Bervell, B., and I.N. Umar. 2017. “Validation of the UTAUT Model: Re-considering Non-Linear Relationships of Exogeneous Variables in Higher Education Technology Acceptance Research.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13 (10): 6471–6490. doi:10.12973/ejmste/78076.
  • BMW. 2013. New BMW campaign: “Designed for driving pleasure”. https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T0137101EN/new-bmw-campaign-designed-for-driving-pleasure.
  • Chang, C.C., S.W. Hung, M.J. Cheng, and C.Y. Wu. 2015. “Exploring the Intention to Continue Using Networking Sites: The Case of Facebook.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 95: 48–56. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.012.
  • Chau, P. Y. K. 1997. “Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Decision Sciences 28 (2): 309–334. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x.
  • Choi, J.K., and Y.G. Ji. 2015. “Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31 (10): 692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549.
  • Cullinane, S. 2002. “The Relationship between Car Ownership and Public Transport Provision: A Case Study of Hong Kong.” Transport Policy 9 (1): 29–39. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00028-2.
  • Davis, F.D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–333. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Distler, V., C. Lallemand, and T. Bellet. 2018. “Acceptability and Acceptance of Autonomous Mobility on Demand: The Impact of an Immersive Experience.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 612.
  • Dixon, G., P. Sol Hart, C. Clarke, N.H. O Donnell, and J. Hmielowski. 2020. “What Drives Support for Self-Driving Car Technology in the United States?” Journal of Risk Research 23 (3): 275–287. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1517384.
  • Dudenhöffer, K. 2013. “Why Electric Vehicles Failed: An Experimental Study with PLS Approach Based on the Technology Acceptance Model.” Journal of Management Control 24 (2): 95–124. doi:10.1007/s00187-013-0174-2.
  • Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
  • Gkartzonikas, C., and K. Gkritza. 2019. “What Have we Learned? A Review of Stated Preference and Choice Studies on Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98: 323–337. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.003.
  • Gould, J., and T.F. Golob. 1998. “Clean Air Forever? a Longitudinal Analysis of Opinions about Air Pollution and Electric Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 3 (3): 157–169. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00018-7.
  • Haboucha, C.J., R.I. Ishaq, and Y. Shiftan. 2017. “User Preferences regarding Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 78: 37–49. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010.
  • Hagman, O. 2003. “Mobilizing Meanings of Mobility: Car Users' Constructions of the Goods and Bads of Car Use.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00014-7.
  • Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hair, J.F., G. T. M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Hair, J., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson. 2014. “Multivariate Analysis.” In Pearson New International Edition. Harlow: Essex.
  • Hair, J.F., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
  • Handy, S., L. Weston, and P.L. Mokhtarian. 2005. “Driving by Choice or Necessity?.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (2-3): 183–203. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.002.
  • Hensher, D.A. 1998. “The Imbalance between Car and Public Transport Use in Urban Australia: why Does It Exist?.” Transport Policy 5 (4): 193–204. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00022-5.
  • Hine, J., and J. Scott. 2000. “Seamless, Accessible Travel: users' Views of the Public Transport Journey and Interchange.” Transport Policy 7 (3): 217–226. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00022-6.
  • Hooper, D., J. Coughlan, and M. Mullen. 2008. “Structural Equation Modelling: guidelines for Determining Model Fit.” Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6: 53–60.
  • Hox, J., J., and T.M. Bechger. 1998. “An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling.” Family Science Review 11: 354–373.
  • Hu, L., and P.M. Bentler. 2009. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Jensen, M. 1999. “Passion and Heart in Transport – a Sociological Analysis on Transport Behaviour.” Transport Policy 6 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00029-8.
  • Karahanna, E., R. Agarwal, and C.M. Angst. 2006. “Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research.” MIS Quarterly 30: 781–804. doi:10.2307/25148754.
  • Kaur, K., and G. Rampersad. 2018. “Trust in Driverless Cars: Investigating Key Factors Influencing the Adoption of Driverless Cars.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 48: 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006.
  • Kline, R.B. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling Methodology in the Social Sciences (4th ed.). NY: Guilford Publication.
  • Kock, N. 2015. “Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach.” International Journal of e-Collaboration 11 (4): 1–10. doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
  • Koenig-Lewis, N., M. Morgan, A. Palmer, and A. Zhao. 2015. “Enjoyment and Social Influence: predicting Mobile Payment Adoption.” The Service Industries Journal 35 (10): 537–554. doi:10.1080/02642069.2015.1043278.
  • König, M., and L. Neumayr. 2017. “Users' Resistance towards Radical Innovations: The Case of the Self-Driving Car.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 44: 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013.
  • Kumar, J.A., and B. Bervell. 2019. “Google Classroom for Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Modelling the Initial Perceptions of Students.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (2): 1793–1817. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z.
  • Krueger, R., T.H. Rashidi, and J.M. Rose. 2016. “Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 69: 343–355. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015.
  • Lavieri, P.S., V.M. Garikapati, C.R. Bhat, R.M. Pendyala, S. Astroza, and F.F. Dias. 2017. Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies. Accessed at: http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/AB-STRACTS/AV_paper.pdf. doi:10.3141/2665-01.
  • Liljamo, T., H. Liimatainen, and M. Pöllänen. 2018. “Attitudes and Concerns on Automated Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 59: 24–44. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010.
  • Larson, J. 1998. “Surveying Commuting.” American Demographics 20: 7.
  • Lee, Y.C., and J.H. Mirman. 2018. “Parents' Perspectives on Using Autonomous Vehicles to Enhance Children's Mobility.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 96: 415–431. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.001.
  • Liu, P., Q. Guo, F. Ren, L. Wang, and Z. Xu. 2019. “Willingness to Pay for Self-Driving Vehicles: Influence of Demographics and Psychological Factors.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 100: 306–317. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.022.
  • Liu, P., Z. Xu, and X. Zhao. 2019. “Road Tests of Self-Driving Vehicles: Affective and Cognitive Pathways in Acceptance Formation.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124: 354–369. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004.
  • Madigan, R., T. Louw, M. Dziennus, T. Graindorge, E. Ortega, M. Graindorge, and N. Merat. 2016. “Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an Adaptation of the UTAUT Model.” In Proceedings of the 6th Transport Research Arena, April 18-21, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Madigan, R., T. Louw, M. Wilbrink, A. Schieben, and N. Merat. 2017. “What Influences the Decision to Use Automated Public Transport? Using UTAUT to Understand Public Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50: 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007.
  • Merat, N., and Y. Barnard. Technology Acceptance by car drivers over the age of 70. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2010.
  • Merat, N., T. Louw, R. Madigan, M. Wilbrink, and A. Schieben. 2018. “What Externally Presented Information Do VRUs Require When Interacting with Fully Automated Road Transport Systems in Shared Space?” Accident; Analysis and Prevention 118: 244–252. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018.
  • Mokhtarian, P.L., and I. Salomon. 2001. “How Derived is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (8): 695–719. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6.
  • Nazari, F., M. Noruzoliaee, and A.K. Mohammadian. 2018. “Shared versus Private Mobility: Modeling Public Interest in Autonomous Vehicles Accounting for Latent Attitudes.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 97: 456–477. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.005.
  • Nielsen, T. A. S., and S. Haustein. 2018. “On Sceptics and Enthusiasts: What Are the Expectations towards Self-Driving Cars?.” Transport Policy 66: 49–55. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.004.
  • Nordfjærn, T., H.B. Lind, Ö. Şimşekoğlu, S.H. Jørgensen, I.O. Lund, and T. Rundmo. 2015. “Habitual, Safety and Security Factors Related to Mode Use on Two Types of Travels among Urban Norwegians.” Safety Science 76: 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.001.
  • Nordhoff, S., J. De Winter, W. Payre, B. Van Arem, and R. Happee. 2019. “What Impressions Do Users Have after a Ride in an Automated Shuttle? An Interview Study.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 63: 252–269. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.009.
  • Nordhoff, S., M. Kyriakidis, B. Van Arem, and R. Happee. 2019. “A Multi-Level Model on Automated Vehicle Acceptance (MAVA): a Review-Based Study.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20 (6): 682–710. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2019.1621406.
  • Nordhoff, S., V. Malmsten, B. Van Arem, and R. Happee. (Under Review). A structural equation modelling approach for acceptance of driverless automated vehicles based on constructs from the Unified Theory of Acceptance of Use of Technology and the Diffusion of Innovation Theory.
  • Panagiotopoulos, I., and G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2018. “An Empirical Investigation on Consumers' Intentions towards Autonomous Driving.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 95: 773–784. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013.
  • Pettigrew, S., L.M. Dana, and R. Norman. 2019. “Clusters of Potential Autonomous Vehicles Users according to Their Propensity to Use Individual versus Shared Vehicles.” Transport Policy 76: 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.010.
  • Pudāne, B., M. Rataj, E. J. E. Molin, N. Mouter, S. Van Cranenburgh, and C.G. Chorus. 2019. “How Will Automated Vehicles Shape Users' Daily Activities? Insights from Focus Groups with Commuters in The Netherlands.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 71: 222–235. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.014.
  • Raykov, T., and G.A. Marcoulides. 2006. A First Course in Structural Equation Modelling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Redman, L., M. Friman, T. Gärling, and T. Hartig. 2013. “Quality Attributes of Public Transport That Attract Car Users: A Research Review.” Transport Policy 25: 119–127. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005.
  • Rosseel, Y. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
  • Salomon, I., and P.L. Mokhtarian. 1997. “Coping with Congestion: Understanding the Gap between Policy Assumptions and Behaviour.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 (2): 107–123. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00003-5.
  • Soteropoulos, A., M. Berger, and F. Ciari. 2019. “Impacts of Automated Vehicles on Travel Behavior and Land Use: An International Review of Modelling Studies.” Transport Reviews 39 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253.
  • Schafer, J., and J. Graham. 2002. “Missing Data: our View of the State of the Art.” Psychological Methods 7 (2): 147–177.
  • Schreiber, J.B., A. Nora, F.K. Stage, E.A. Barlow, and J. King. 2006. “Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review.” The Journal of Educational Research 99 (6): 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.
  • Shabanpour, R., S. N. D. Mousavi, N. Golshani, J. Auld, and A. Mohammadian. 2017. “Consumer Preferences of Electric and Automated Vehicles.” In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, MT–ITS 2017, 716–720. IEEE, Naples, Italy, June
  • Stocker, A., and S. Shaheen. 2019. “Shared Automated Vehicle (SAV) Pilots and Automated Vehicle Policy in the U.S.: Current and Future Developments.” In Road Vehicle Automation 5, edited by G. Meyer and S. Beiker, 131–147. Springer, Cham.
  • Sparrow, R., and M. Howard. 2017. “When Human Beings Are like Drunk Robots: Driverless Vehicles, Ethics, and the Future of Transport.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 80: 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014.
  • Steg, L. 2005. “Car Use: lust and Must. Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Motives for Car Use.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39: 147–162.
  • Tennant, C., S. Stares, and S. Howard. 2019. “Public Discomfort at the Prospect of Autonomous Vehicles: Building on Previous Surveys to Measure Attitudes in 11 Countries.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 64: 98–118. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.017.
  • Teo, T., and J. Noyes. 2011. “An Assessment of the Influence of Perceived Enjoyment and Attitude on the Intention to Use Technology among Pre-Service Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Computers & Education 57 (2): 1645–1653. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002.
  • Tertoolen, G., D. Van Kreveld, and B. Verstraten. 1998. “Psychological Resistance against Attempts to Reduce Private Car Use.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 32: 171–181.
  • Tubaishat, A. 2017. “Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use of Electronic Health Records among Nurses: Application of Technology Acceptance Model.” Informatics for Health & Social Care 43 (4): 379–389. doi:10.1080/17538157.2017.1363761.
  • Venkatesh, V., and F.D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  • Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478.
  • Venkatesh, V., J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36: 157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412.
  • Wanous, J.P., A.E. Reichers, and M.J. Hudy. 1997. “Overall Job Satisfaction: How Good Are Single-Item Measures?” The Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (2): 247–252. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.
  • Welch, S. 2015. University of Leeds Travel Survey. https://carparking.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/2015-Travel-Survey-Report.pdf.
  • Wu, J., H. Liao, J.W. Wang, and T. Chen. 2019. “The Role of Environmental Concern in the Public Acceptance of Autonomous Electric Vehicles: A Survey from China.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60: 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029.
  • Xu, Z., K. Zhang, H. Min, Z. Wang, X. Zhao, and P. Liu. 2018. “What Drives People to Accept Automated Vehicles? Findings from a Field Experiment.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 95: 320–334. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024.
  • Yap, M.D., G. Correira, and B. Van Arem. 2015. “Valuation of Travel Attributes for Using Automated Vehicles as Egress Transport of Multimodal Train Trips.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 94: 1–16.
  • Younes, B. 1995. “The Benefits of Improving Public Transport: A Myth or Reality?.” Transport Reviews 15 (4): 333–356. doi:10.1080/01441649508716924.
  • Zhang, T., D. Tao, X. Qu, X. Zhang, R. Lin, and W. Zhang. 2019. “The Roles of Initial Trust and Perceived Risk in Public's Acceptance of Automated Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98: 207–220. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018.
  • Zoellick, J.C., A. Kuhlmey, L. Schenk, D. Schindel, and S. Blüher. 2019. “Assessing Acceptance of Electric Automated Vehicles after Exposure in a Realistic Traffic Environment.” PLoS ONE 14 (5): e0215969. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215969.
  • Zmud, J., and I.N. Sener. 2017. “Towards an Understanding of the Travel Behavior Impact of Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Procedia 25: 2500–2519. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.281.