References
- Morahan-Martin J M. How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 2004; 7: 497–510
- Tu H T, Hargraves J L. Seeking health care information: Most consumers still on the sidelines. Issue Brief, Center for Studying Health System Change 2003; 61: 1–4
- Escoffery C, Miner K R, Adame D D, Butler S, McCormick L, Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. Journal of American College Health 2005; 53: 183–188
- Leadbetter M. Internet support for people who are affected by breast cancer. Nursing Times 2003; 99(14)26–27
- Benotsch E G, Kalichman S, Weinhardt L S. HIV-AIDS patients' evaluations of health information on the Internet: the digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004; 72: 1004–1011
- Travers R L. Information consumerism on the world wide web: Implications for dermatologists and patients. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 2002; 21: 223–231
- Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe P M, Latthe M, Khan K S. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics. British Medical Journal 2002; 324: 581–582
- Kim P, Eng T R, Deering M J, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related websites: A review. British Medical Journal 1999; 318: 647–649
- Latthe P M, Latthe M, Khan K S. Quality of information on female sterilisation on the Internet. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 20: 167–170
- Feathers A S, Charron-Prochownik D, Siminerio L M, Manthei E R, Dorman J S. Genetics and type 1 diabetes: Online resources for patients. Diabetes Education 2004; 30: 972–979
- Kunst H, Khan K S. Quality of web-based medical information on stable COPD: A comparison of non-commercial and commercial websites. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2002; 19: 42–48
- Mashiach R, Seidman G I, Seidman D S. Use of mifepristone as an example of conflicting and misleading medical information on the Internet. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002; 109: 437–442
- Diering C L, Palmer M H. Professional information about urinary incontinence on the world wide web: It is timely? Is it accurate?. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 2001; 28: 55–62
- Latthe M, Latthe P M, Charlton R. Quality of information on emergency contraception on the Internet. British Journal of Family Planning 2000; 26: 39–43
- Latthe P M, Latthe M, Khan K S. Quality of medical information about menorrhagia on the worldwide web. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 107: 39–43
- Junghans T B, Sevin I F, Ionin B, Seifried H. Cancer information resources: Digital and online sources. Toxicology 2002; 173: 13–34
- Walther J B, Wang Z, Loh T. The effect of top-level domains and advertisements on health web-site credibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004; 2: e24
- Nahm E D, Preece J, Resnick B, Mills M E. Usability of health web sites for older adults: A preliminary study. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2004; 22: 325–334
- Roberts J M, Copeland K L. Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 62: 181–187
- Dyer K A. Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the internet: A review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001; 3: e23
- Peterson G, Aslani P, Williams K A. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the Internet?: A qualitative study using focus groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003; 5: e33
- Jacob J. Consumer access to health care information: Its effect on the physician – patient relationship. Alaska Medicine 2002; 44: 75–83
- Gray N J, Klein J D, Noyce P R, Sesselberg T S, Cantrill J A. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the Internet. Social Science and Medicine 2005; 60: 1467–1478
- Stavri P Z, Freeman D J, Burroughs C M. Perception of quality and trustworthiness of Internet resources by personal health information seekers. Annual Symposium Proceedings, Bethesda, MD, 2003. American Medical Informatics Association, 629–633
- Dutta-Bergman M. Trusted online sources of health information: differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003; 5: e21
- Stella N. Credibility and consistency earn users' trust. Internet Healthcare Strategy 2003; 5: 8–9
- Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for an appraise health information on the world wide web?: Qualitative study using focus groups, usability testing, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal 2002; 324: 572–577
- Casebeer L, Bennett B, Kristofoc R, Carillo A, Centor R. Physician Internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professionals 2002; 22: 22–42
- Menon A M, Deshpande A D, Perri M, III, Zinkhan H M. Trust in online prescription drug information among Internet users: The impact on information search behavior after exposure to direct-to-consumer advertising. Health Marketing Quarterly 2002; 20: 17–35
- Dutta-Bergman M. The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication 2004; 54: 253–269
- Shon J, Marshall J, Musen M A. The impact of displayed awards on the credibility and retention of web site information. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium. Los Angeles, CA 2000; 794–798
- QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau [Internet]. United States Census Bureau. Washington, DC 2005, Feb. 1 – [cited 2005 May 1]. Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39/39009.html
- Groot D, ter Riet G, Khan K S, Misso K. Comparison of search strategies and quality of medical information on the Internet: A study related to ankle sprain. Injury 2001; 32: 472–476