An analysis of how metalinguistic terms are realised in British sign language in the context of teaching English to deaf learners

References

• Aldersson, R., & McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. (2008). A lexical comparison of signs from Icelandic and Danish sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 9(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0007
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Battison, R. M. (1974). Phonological deletion in American sign language. Sign Language Studies, 1005(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1974.0005
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, J. A. (1991). Lexical variation in Mexican sign language. Sign Language Studies, 1072(1), 241–276. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1991.0010
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., Colville, M., & Lawson, L. (1984). Words in hand. A structural analysis of the signs of British sign language. Cromwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crasborn, O., Sloetjes, H., Auer, E., & Wittenburg, P. (2006). Combining video and numeric data in the analysis of sign languages within the ELAN annotation software. In C. Vetoori (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign languages: Lexicographic matters and didactic scenarios (pp. 82–87). Paris: ELRA.
   Google Scholar
• Crasborn, O. (2006). Nonmanual structures in sign language. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 668–672, Vol. 8). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H., & Hessmann, J. (1996). Signs and words: Accounting for spoken language elements in German sign language. In W. Edmonson, & R. Wilbur (Eds.), International review of sign linguistics (pp. 23–56, Vol. 1). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ebling, S., Konrad, R., Boyes Braem, P., & Langer, G. (2015). Factors to consider when making lexical comparisons of sign languages: Notes from an ongoing comparison of German sign language and Swiss German sign language. Sign Language Studies, 16(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2015.0024
   Google Scholar
• Fenlon, J., Cormier, K., Rentelis, R., Schembri, A., Rowley, K., Adam, R., & Woll, B. (2014). BSL signbank: A lexical database of British sign language (1st ed.). Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, G. (2003). How to study linguistics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. A. (1975). Phonological processes in American sign language. Proceedings of the first Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society (pp. 47–159).
   Google Scholar
• Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American sign language. Language, 51(3), 696–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/412894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language (7th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O., Ibarra-Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualisim for learning. Calson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, P. (1996). Cooperative enquiry: Research into the human condition. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, L., & Kusters, A. (2020). Linguistic ethnography of signed languages. In K. Tusting (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography (pp. 340–55). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2003). BSL, Auslan and NZSL: Three signed languages or one? In A. Baker, B. Van den, & O. Crasborn (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research Selected Papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 47–70). Signum. Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, J., & Woll, B. (1985). Sign language: The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. (Ed.). (2010). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mckee, D., & Kennedy, G. (2000). A lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British and New Zealand sign languages. In H. Lane, & K. Emmorey (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honour Ursula Bellugi & Edward Klima (pp. 49–76). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., & Watson, A. (2014). The role of grammar in the writing curriculum: A review of the literature. Child Language and Teaching Therapy, 30(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013514070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otheguy, R., Garcia, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perniss, P., Orfanidou, E., Woll, B., & Morgan, G. (2015). Collecting and analyzing sign language data: Video requirements and use of annotation software. In E. Orfanidou, B. Woll, & G. Morgan (Eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pottinger, A. (2013). The stage. Stage Media Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. (2010). Schoolization: An account of the origins of regional variation in British sign language. Sign Language Studies, 10(4), 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0056
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G., Cameron, A., & O’ Neill, R. (2021). Signing the times. In Z. Canacas (Ed.), NEWSLI (pp. 27–31). Duncan Print Group.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G., & O Neill, R. (2008). ‘Developing a bilingual online glossary of science signs: An evaluation. Paper presented at Exploring Instructional and Access Technologies Symposium 2008, Rochester, United States, 23/06/08.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. University of Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of British sign language: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, R. (2017). Translanguaging, learning and deaf education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L. (2016). Epilogue: Multi-competence and the translanguaging instinct. In V. Cook, & W. Li (Eds.), The Cambridge book of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 533–543). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied linguistics 2018: 39/1: 9–30. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysg uwchradd ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education]. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Wales, Bangor, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (1996). Secondary education: Teaching in the bilingual situation. In C. Williams, G. Lewis, & C. Baker (Eds.), The language policy: Taking stock (pp. 39–78). CAI.
   Google Scholar
• Woll, B., Allsop, L., & Sutton-Spence, R. (1991). Variation and recent change in British sign language: Final report to the ESRC. University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar