Being an identity-release donor: a qualitative study exploring the motivations, experiences and future expectations of current UK egg donors

References

• Abdalla, H., Shenfield, F., & Latarche, E. (1998). Statutory information for the children born of oocyte donation in the UK: What will they be told in 2008? Human Reproduction, 13, 1106–1109. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2006). ‘Why do you want to be a donor?’ Gender and the production of altruism in egg and sperm donation. New Genetics and Society, 25, 143–157. doi: 10.1080/14636770600855184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2014). Defining connections: Gender and perceptions of relatedness in egg and sperm donation. In Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (Eds.), Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities (pp. 147–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (2000). The elusive embryo: How men and women approach new reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, L., Sidebotham, M., & Lieberman, B. (2002). Egg donation-the donor’s view: An aid to future recruitment. Human Fertility, 5, 175–182. doi: 10.1080/1464727022000199082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, J., Holden, J., & Agovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Dally, J. (2012). Producing sperm, egg and embryo donors’ pen portraits and other personal information for later use by donor offspring: An exploratory study of professional practices. Human Fertility, 15, 82–88. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2012.687123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K.R., Curson, R., & Lewis, G.M. (1996). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics. Human Reproduction, 11, 746–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, D., Handley, S., Duqueno, L., Weaver, S., & Lui, S. (1998). Motivation, attitudes and experiences of donation: A follow up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 273–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199807/08)8:4 < 273::AIDCASP496 > 3.0.CO;2-Q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (Eds.) (2014). Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., & Farrand, A. (2007). UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: Implications for recruitment. Human Reproduction, 22, 1675–1680. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA. (2011). The changing landscape of donation. Retrieved July 3, 2015, from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Factsheet-Changing_landscape_2011_02_11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA. (2014). Egg and sperm donation in the UK: 2012–2013. Retrieved October 30, 2014, from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Egg_and_sperm_donation_in_the_UK_2012-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2012). Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: Follow-up at offspring age 1–4 years. Human Reproduction, 27, 2998–3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, C., Belar, C., & Williams, R.S. (2004). Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 25, 145–151. doi: 10.1080/1674820400002261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalfoglou, A., & Geller, G. (2000). A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertility and Sterility, 74, 660–667. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01489-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalfoglou, A., & Gittelsohn, J. (2000). A qualitative follow-up study of women’s experiences with oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 15, 798–805. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.4.798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, N., & McGowan, M. (2010). Looking back: Egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 455–466. doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S., Braverman, A.M., & Rausch, D.T. (1998). Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: A preliminary study. Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 229–237. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S., Stout, J.E., & Davidson, M. (2003). Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors. Fertility and Sterility, 79, 1312–1316. doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00348-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. (2005). Nameless relations: Anonymity, melanesia and reproductive gift exchange between British ova donors and recipients. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lifecycle. (2013). ‘Information for current egg and sperm donors’. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Lifecycle_-_Info_for_current_egg_and_sperm_donors_v1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: On what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark. Anthropology and Medicine, 21, 162–173. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2014.925083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2013). Donor conception: Ethical aspects of information sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• ONS. (2013). ‘Live births in England and Wales by characteristics of mother 1, 2013: Timing of childbirth’. Retrieved July 6, 2016, from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/characteristics-of-Mother-1–england-and-wales/2013/stb-characteristics-of-mother-1–2013.html#tab-Timing-of-Childbearing.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, M., Smith, A., Meyer, W., & Bashford, R. (2001). Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow up questionnaire. Fertility and Sterility, 75, 1034–1036. doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01690-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G. (1995). Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes? Human Reproduction, 10, 2736–2740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G., de Mouzon, J., Shenfield, F., Ferraretti, A.P., Mardesic, T., Ruiz, A., & Goossens, V. (2014). Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries. Human Reproduction, 29, 1076–1089. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, N. (2011). Eggs-ploiting women: A critical feminist analysis of the different principles in transplant and fertility tourism. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23, 634–641. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. (2009). Systematic review of oocyte donation: Investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Human Reproduction Update, 15, 499–515. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, I., Ravelingien, A., & Pennings, G. (2013). The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes. Human Reproduction, 28, 560–565. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M. (2014). A British history of collaborative reproduction and the rise of the genetic connection. In Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (Eds.), Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D., & Russell, L. (2010). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–272. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodino, I., Burton, P., & Sanders, K. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: An Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheib, J.E., Riordan, M., & Rubin, S. (2005). Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: Reports from 12–17 year olds. Human Reproduction, 20, 239–252. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. (1983). The handbook of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Geijerwall, A.L., Gudmundsson, J., Karlstrom, P.O., Solensten, N.G., & Sydsjö, G. (2012). Gamete donors’ motivation in a Swedish national sample: Is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandanavia, 91, 944–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01430.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjö, G., Lampic, C., Brändström, S., Gudmundsson, J., Karlström, P.O., Solensten, N.G., … Svanberg, A.S. (2011). Personality characteristics in a Swedish national sample of identifiable oocyte donors. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 118, 1067–1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02953.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, S., Blyth, E., & Tsang, A. (2011). Oocyte donors’ experiences of altruistic donation: A qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 29, 404–415. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2011.611938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar