References
- Australian and New Zealand Infertility Counseling Association (ANZICA). (2012). Guidelines for Professional Standards of Practice Infertility Counseling. Retrieved from https://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/anzica/policy-documents/.
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ASRM). (2013). Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 47–62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.037.
- Beeson, D.R., Jennings, P.K., & Kramer, W. (2011). Offspring searching for their sperm donors: How family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction, 26, 2415–2424. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der202.
- Benward, J. (2015). Mandatory counseling for gamete donation recipients: Ethical dilemmas. Fertility and Sterility, 104, 507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1154.
- Blake, L., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2014). Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: A follow-up over 10 years. Human Reproduction, 29, 2487–2496. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu231.
- Blyth, E., & Hunt, J. (1998). Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: Views from licensed centres on HFEA donor information form (91) 4. Human Reproduction, 13, 3274–3277. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3274.
- Blyth, E. (2012). Guidelines for infertility counseling in different countries: Is there an emerging trend? Human Reproduction, 19, 2046–2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des112.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Braverman, A.M. (2015). Mental health counseling in third-party reproduction in the United States: Evaluation, psychoeducation, or ethical gatekeeping? Fertility and Sterility, 104, 501–506. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.023.
- Cousineau, T.M., & Domar, A.D. (2007). Psychological impact of infertility. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21, 293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003.
- Covington, S.N., & Burns, L.H. (Eds.). (2006). Infertility counseling. A comprehensive handbook for clinicians (pp. 212–235). Cambridge: University Press.
- Crawshaw, M. (2008). Prospective parents’ intentions regarding disclosure following the removal of donor anonymity. Human Fertility, 11, 95–100. doi: 10.1080/14647270701694282.
- Crawshaw, M., Hunt, J., Monach, J., Pike, S., & Wilde, R. (2013). British infertility counselling association guidelines for good practice in infertility counselling. Third edition 2012. Human Fertility, 16, 73–88. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.774217.
- Crawshaw, M., & Montuschi, O. (2014). It ‘did what it said on the tin’ – participant’s views of the content and process of donor conception parenthood preparation workshops. Human Fertility, 17, 11–20. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2014.881562.
- Crawshaw, M., Adams, D., Allan, S., Blyth, E., Bourne, K., Brügge, C., … Zweifel, J.E. (2017). Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction, 32, 1535–1536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex107.
- Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Rapport, F. (2013). Assisted conception and South Asian communities in the UK: Public perceptions of the use of donor gametes in infertility treatment. Human Fertility, 16, 48–53. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.773091.
- Daniels, K.R., Lewis, G.M., & Gillett, W. (1995). Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: The nature of couples’ decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 40, 1213–1220. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00251-N.
- Daniels, K., Gillett, W., & Grace, V. (2009). Parental information sharing with donor insemination conceived offspring: A follow-up study. Human Reproduction, 24, 1099–1105. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den495.
- Daniels, K.R., Grace, V.M., & Gillett, W.R. (2011). Factors associated with parents’ decision to tell their adult offspring about the offspring’s donor conception. Human Reproduction, 26, 2783–2790. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der247.
- Dutch Law: Wet donorgegevens kunstmatige bevruchting. (2002). [Law Donordata Artificial Insemination]. Retrieved from http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0013642/2016-08-01.
- ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. (2002). III. Gamete and embryo donation. Human Reproduction, 17, 1407–1408. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1407.
- ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, Pennings, G., de Wert, G., Shenfield, F., Cohen, J., Tarlatzis, B., & Devroey, P. (2007). ESHRE task force on ethics and law 13: The welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction, 22, 2585–2588. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem237.
- Freeman, T., Jolley, G., Baum, F., Lawless, A., Javanparast, S., & Labonté, R. (2014). Community assessment workshops: A group method for gathering client experiences of health services. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 47–56. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12060.
- Freeman, T., Zadeh, S., Smith, V., & Golombok, S. (2016). Disclosure of sperm donation: A comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 33, 592–600. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.08.004.
- Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Dancet, E., de Klerk, C., Emery, M., Lewis-Jones, C., … Vermeulen, N. (2015). ESHRE guideline: Routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction—a guide for fertility staff. Human Reproduction, 11, 2476–2485. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev177.
- Gartrell, N.K., Bos, H., Goldberg, N.G., Deck, A., & van Rijn-van Gelderen, L. (2015). Satisfaction with known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donors: Reports from lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents. Fertility and Sterility, 103, 242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.019.
- Giorgi, A. (2000). Concerning the application of phenomenology to caring research. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 14, 11–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2000.tb00555.x.
- Golombok, S., Ilioi, E., Blake, L., Roman, G., & Jadva, V. (2017). A longitudinal study of families formed through reproductive donation: Parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent adjustment at age 14. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1966–1977. doi: 10.1037/dev0000372.
- Golombok, S. (2017). Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32, 1532–1536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex104.
- Grace, V.M., Daniels, K.R., & Gillett, W. (2008). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 301–314. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029.
- Greenfeld, D.A. (2008). The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: Donors, intended parents and offspring. Review. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20, 265–268. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32830136ca.
- Haimes, E. (1998). Gamete and embryo donation: Ethical implications for families. Human Fertility, 1, 30–34. doi: 10.1080/1464727982000198081.
- Hammarberg, K., Carmichael, M., Tinney, L., & Mulder, A. (2008). Gamete donors’ and recipients’ evaluation of donor counselling: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 48, 601–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00925.x.
- Hertz, R., Nelson, M.K., & Kramer, W. (2013). Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Social Science & Medicine, 86, 52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.001.
- Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2017). Code of practice (8th ed.). London: HFEA.
- Ilioi, E., Blake, L., Jadva, V., Roman, G., & Golombok, S. (2017). The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: A longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 315–324. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12667.
- Indekeu, A., Rober, P., Schotsmans, P., Daniels, K.R., Dierickx, K., & D'Hooghe, T. (2013). How couples’ experiences prior to the start of infertility treatment with donor gametes influences the disclosure decision. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 76, 125–132. doi: 10.1159/000353901.
- Indekeu, A., D’hooghe, T., Daniels, K.R., Dierckx, K., & Rober, P. (2014). When ‘sperm’ becomes ‘donor’: Transitions in parents’ views of the sperm donor. Human Fertility, 17, 269–277. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2014.910872.
- Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2012). Disclosure behavior and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: Follow-up at offspring age 1–4 years. Human Reproduction, 27, 2998–3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285.
- Isaksson, S., Skoog-Svanberg, A., Sydsjö, G., Linell, L., & Lampic, C. (2016). It takes two to tango: Information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation. Human Reproduction, 31, 125–132. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev293.
- Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: Comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction, 24, 1909–1919. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep110.
- Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001.
- Kirkman, M. (2003). Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 57, 2229–2242. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00099-6.
- Lalos, A., Gottlieb, C., & Lalos, O. (2007). Legislated right for donor- insemination children to know their genetic origin: A study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction, 22, 1759–1768. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem063.
- Landau, R. (1998). Secrecy, anonymity, and deception in donor insemination: A genetic, psycho. Social and Ethical Critique. Social Work in Health Care, 28, 75–89. doi: 10.1300/J010v28n01_05.
- Laruelle, C., Place, I., & Demeesterre, I. (2011). Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte and ethnic donation. Human Reproduction, 26, 382–390. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq346.
- Leiblum, S.R., & Hamkins, S.E. (1992). To tell or not to tell: Attitudes of reproductive Endocrinologists Concerning disclosure to offspring of conception via assisted insemination by donor. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 13, 267–275. doi: 10.3109/01674829209009199.
- Leiblum, S.R., & Aviv, A.L. (1997). Disclosure issues and decisions of couples who conceived via donor insemination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 18, 292–300. doi: 10.3109/01674829709080702.
- Lucassen, P.L.B.J., & Olde Hartman, T.C. (2007). Kwalitatief onderzoek [qualitative research]. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
- Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R., & Golombok, S. (2004). Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: A study of family relationships, child adjustment and disclosure. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.039.
- Mahlstedt, P.P., LaBounty, K., & Kennedy, W.T. (2010). The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: Essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 2236–2246. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.119.
- MAXQDA. (2011). Software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin: VERBI Software - Consult – Sozialforschung GmbH.
- McWhinnie, A. (2000). Families from assisted conception: Ethical and psychological issues. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 3, 13–19. doi: 10.1080/1464727002000198641.
- McWhinnie, A. (2001). Gamete donation and anonymity: Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Human Reproduction, 16, 807–817. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.807.
- Nederlands Instituut van Psychologen. (2015). [Dutch society of Psychologists]. Beroepscode [Code of Ethics]. Retrieved from http://www.psynip.nl/uw-beroep/beroepsethiek/beroepscode.
- Nordqvist, P. (2012). ‘Origins and originators: Lesbian couples negotiating parental identities and sperm donor conception. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14, 297–311. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.639392.
- Norré, J., & Wischmann, T. (2011). The position of the fertility counsellor in a fertility team: A critical appraisal. Human Fertility, 14, 154–159. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2011.580824.
- NVOG Modelprotocol. (2010). Mogelijke morele contra-indicaties bij vruchtbaarheidsbehandelingen. [Possible moral contra-indications in fertility treatment]. Retrieved from https://www.nvog.nl/kwaliteitsdocumenten/protocollen/.
- Paul, M.S., & Berger, R. (2007). Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination. Human Reproduction, 22, 2566–2571. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem174.
- Pennings, G. (2017). Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32, 969–973. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex056.
- Readings, J., Blake, L., & Casey, P. (2011). Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: Decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 485–495. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014.
- Rodino, I.S., Burton, P.J., & Sanders, K.A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: An Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007.
- Rumball, A., & Adair, V. (1999). Telling the story: Parents’ scripts for donor offspring. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 14, 1392–1399. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1392.
- Sälevaara, M., Suikkari, A.M., & Söderström-Anttila, V. (2013). Attitudes and disclosure decisions of Finnish parents with children conceived using donor sperm. Human Reproduction, 28, 2746–2754. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det313.
- Salter-Ling, N., Hunter, M., & Glover, L. (2001). Donor insemination: Exploring the experience of treatment and intention to tell. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 19, 175–186. doi: 10.1080/02646830124445.
- Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 230–240. doi: 10.1002/nur.1025.
- Scheib, J.E., Riordan, M., & Rubin, S. (2003). Choosing identity-release sperm donors: The parents’ perspective 13–18 years later. Human Reproduction, 18, 1115–1127. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg227.
- Scheib, J., Riordan, M., & Rubin, S. (2005). Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: Reports from 12–17 year olds. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 20, 239–252. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh581.
- Söderström-Anttila, V., Sälevaara, M., & Suikkari, A.M. (2010). Increasing openness in oocyte donation families regarding disclosure over 15 years. Human Reproduction, 25, 2535–2542. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq194.
- Then, K.L., Rankin, J.A., & Ali, E. (2014). Focus group research: What is it and how can it be used. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 24, 16–22. Retrieved from http://www.cccn.ca/content.php?doc=234.
- Thorn, P., & Wischmann, T. (2009). German Guidelines for psychosocial counseling in the area of gamete donation. Human Fertility, 12, 73–80. doi: 10.1080/14647270802712728.
- Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32- item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
- Turner, A.J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experience of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041.
- Visser, M., Gerrits, T., Kop, F., van der Veen, F., & Mochtar, M. (2016). Exploring parents’ feelings about counseling in donor sperm treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 37, 156–163. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1195806.
- Zadeh, S., Freeman, T., & Golombok, S. (2016). Absence of presence? Complexities in the donor narratives of single mothers using sperm donation. Human Reproduction, 31, 117–124. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev275.