The interaction between donor-conceived families and their environment: parents’ perceptions of societal understanding and attitudes regarding their family-building

References

• Adrian, S.W. (2010). Sperm stories: Policies and practices of sperm banking in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17, 393–411. doi: 10.1177/1350506810378078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G.A., Butler, A., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2005). Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics. (2004). Recommendation n° 27 regarding sperm donation and oocyte donation. https://www.health.belgium.be/nl/advies-nr-27-donatie-van-sperma-en-eicellen, 2018 (accessed 23 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2010). Genetic relatedness and family formation in Israel: Lay perceptions in the light of state policy. New Genetics and Society, 29, 73–85. doi: 10.1080/14636770903561380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E. (2012). Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: Is there an emerging trend? Human Reproduction, 27, 2046–2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Langridge, D., & Harris, R. (2010). Family building in donor conception: Parents’ experiences of sharing information. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28, 116–127. doi: 10.1080/02646830903295018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. (2011). Boundaries and risk: Media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabb, S., & Augoustinos, M. (2008). Genes and families in the media: Implications of genetic discourse for constructions of the ‘family’. Health Sociology Review, 17, 303–312. doi: 10.5172/hesr.451.17.3.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Montuschi, O. (2013). Participants’ views of attending parenthood preparation workshops for those contemplating donor conception parenthood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 31, 58–71. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2012.748886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Montuschi, O. (2014). It ‘did what it said on the tin’ - Participants’ views of the content and process of Donor Conception Parenthood Preparation Workshops. Human Fertility, 17, 11–20. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2014.881562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Thorn, P., & Westerbrooke, R. (2007). Confidence in the use of donor insemination: An evaluation of the impact of participating in a group preparation programme. Human Fertility, 10, 13–20. doi: 10.1080/14647270600973035.
   Google Scholar
• Donor Conception Network. (2014). The young people’s panel share their experiences and thoughts on our new publication and more. DCN Journal, 10, 7–12. https://www.dcnetwork.org/
   Google Scholar
• Donor Conception Network. (2017). Five go to Bristol. DCN Journal, 17, 8–13. https://www.dcnetwork.org/
   Google Scholar
• ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. (2002). III. Gamete and embryo donation. Human Reproduction, 17, 1407–1408. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2004). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertility & Sterility, 81, 527–531. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. (2001). Guidelines for counselling in infertility. https://www.eshre.eu/Specialty-groups/Special-Interest-Groups/Psychology-Counselling/Archive/Guidelines.aspx, 2001 (accessed 1 August, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Finkler, K. (2001). The kin in the gene: The medicalization of family and kinship in American society. Current Anthropology, 42, 235–263. doi: 10.1086/320004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, K., Glover, L., & Abel, P. (2004). Masculinity, infertility, stigma and media reports. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1169–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A.E., Kinkler, L.A., & Hines, D.A. (2011). Perception and internalization of adoption stigma among gay, lesbian, and heterosexual adoptive parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 7, 132–154. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2011.537554.
   Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Brewaeys, A., Cook, R., Giavazzi, M.T., Guerra, D., Mantovani, A., … Dexeus, S. (1996). Children: The European study of assisted reproduction families: Family functioning and child development. Human Reproduction, 11, 2324–2331. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V., & Daniels, K. (2007). The (ir)relevance of genetics. Engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29, 692–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01010.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson-Payne, J. (2016). Grammars of kinship: Biological motherhood and assisted reproduction in the age of epigenetics. Signs, 41, 483–506. doi: 10.1086/684233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, S.J., & Craft-Rosenberg, M. (2002). The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 31, 283–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00050.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K., & Daniels, K. (2007). Parents dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their children. Children & Society, 21, 420–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2006.00079.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holohan, S. (2012). ‘We’re a very normal family’: Representing the mundane in Channel 4’s The Family. Media, Culture & Society, 34, 21–35. doi: 10.1177/0163443711427197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., Culley, L., Rapport, F., Johnson, M., & Bharadwaj, A. (2009). ‘Public’ perceptions of gamete donation: A research review. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 61–77. doi: 10.1177/0963662507078396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. (2008). Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act 1990 as amended in 2008. Section 14, 6C https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents, 2018, (accessed 23 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hynie, M., & Hammer Burns, L. (2006). Cross-cultural issues in infertility counseling. In S.N. Covington & L. Hammer-Burns (Eds.) Infertility counseling. A comprehensive handbook for clinicians (pp. 61–82). New York, NY: The Parthenon Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., & Bastiaansen, L. (2018). Aanwezig en Afwezig: De Inclusie van Families na Donorconceptie in de Schoolcontext vanuit het Perspectief van Leerkrachten en Zorgcoördinatoren [Present and Absent: Inclusion of donor-conceived families in the school context from a teachers’ and school support staff’s perspective]. [special issue]. Pedagogiek, 38, 223–255. doi: 10.5117/PED2018.2.007.INDE.
   Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Dierickx, K., Schotsmans, P., Daniels, K.R., Rober, P., & D'Hooghe, T. (2013). Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 714–733. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (2008). Being a ‘real’ mum: Motherhood through donated eggs and embryos. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31, 241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2008.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, M. (2013). Genetic knowledge and family identity: Managing gamete donation in Britain and Germany. Sociology, 47, 939–956. doi: 10.1177/0038038513501729.
   Google Scholar
• Lalos, A., Gottlieb, C., & Lalos, O. (2007). Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: A study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction, 22, 1759–1768. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, R., Tschann, J., Quiroga, S.S., Pitcher, L., & Becker, G. (1997). Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertility & Sterility, 68, 83–89. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81480-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative strangers. Family life, genes and donor conception. p. 8. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S.D. (2001). Introduction. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 1e31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the future: Essays on anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shehab, D., Duff, J., Pasch, L.A., Mac Dougall, K., Scheib, J.E., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2008). How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: Contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertility & Sterility, 89, 179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, S., Ravelingien, A., Provoost, V., Raes, I., Van Parys, H., Wyverkens, E., …, De Sutter, P. (2015). O-138. Using the same donor for siblings: What it means to parents. Human Reproduction, 30, i60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/30.Supplement_1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., Sälevaara, M., & Suikkari, A.M. (2010). Disclosure decisions in families with oocyte donation children born during a 15-year period. Human Reproduction, 25, 2535–2542. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuber, K.R., & Solomon, D.H. (2011). Factors that predict married partners’ disclosure about infertility to social network members. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 250–270. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2011.585401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Genetic Integrity Act. (2006). Swedish Code of Statutes no 2006:351 Ministry of Health and Social Affairs
   Google Scholar
• Thorn, P., & Daniels, K. (2007). Pro und Contra Kindesaufklärung nach donogener Insemination - Neuere Entwicklungen und Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie [Arguments for and against information sharing in families created with the help of DI - Recent developments and the results of an exploratory study]. Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde, 67, 993–1001. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965582.
   Google Scholar
• Victoria Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority. (2018). Fertility and Assisted Reproduction: Teaching Module. https://www.varta.org.au/resources/publications/fertility-and-assisted-reproduction-teaching-module, 2018, (accessed 23 May 2018).
   Google Scholar