References
- Alhelou, Y., Mat Adenan, N.A., & Ali, J. (2018). Embryo culture conditions are significantly improved during uninterrupted incubation: A randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biology, 18, 40–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2017.12.003.
- Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. (2011). The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Human Reproduction, 26, 1270–1283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037.
- Armstrong, S., Arroll, N., Cree, L.M., Jordan, V., & Farquhar, C. (2015). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD011320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub2.
- Armstrong, S., Bhide, P., Jordan, V., Pacey, A., Marjoribanks, J., & Farquhar, C. (2019). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD011320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub4.
- Barberet, J., Chammas, J., Bruno, C., Valot, E., Vuillemin, C., Jonval, L., … Fauque, P. (2018). Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope. Fertility and Sterility, 109, 302–309.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.008.
- Barrie, A., Homburg, R., McDowell, G., Brown, J., Kingsland, C., & Troup, S. (2017). Embryos cultured in a time-lapse system result in superior treatment outcomes: A strict matched pair analysis. Human Fertility, 20, 179–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2016.1258735.
- Brison, D.R., Roberts, S.A., & Kimber, S.J. (2013). How should we assess the safety of IVF technologies? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27, 710–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.006.
- Cimadomo, D., Scarica, C., Maggiulli, R., Orlando, G., Soscia, D., Albricci, L., … Rienzi, L. (2018). Continuous embryo culture elicits higher blastulation but similar cumulative delivery rates than sequential: A large prospective study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35, 1329–1338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1195-4.
- Critchlow, J.D., Matson, P.L., Newman, M.C., Horne, G., Troup, S.A., & Lieberman, B.A. (1989). Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: Use of human sperm survival studies. Human Reproduction, 4, 545–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136942.
- Cruz, M., Gadea, B., Garrido, N., Pedersen, K.S., Martínez, M., Pérez-Cano, I., … Meseguer, M. (2011). Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28, 569–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9549-1.
- Cutting, R., Morroll, D., Roberts, S.A., Pickering, S., & Rutherford, A; BFS and ACE. (2008). Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Human Fertility, 11, 131–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270802302629.
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. (2018) More than 8 million babies born from IVF since the world’s first in 1978. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180703084127.htm
- Harbottle, S., Hughes, C., Cutting, R., Roberts, S., & Brison, D; Association of Clinical Embryologists and the (ACE) British Fertility Society (BFS). (2015). Elective Single Embryo Transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines. Human Fertility, 18, 165–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2015.1083144.
- Harper, J., Magli, M.C., Lundin, K., Barratt, C.L.R., & Brison, D. (2012). When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Human Reproduction, 27, 303–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der414.
- Kahraman, S., Cetinkaya, M., Pirkevi, C., Yelke, H., & Kumtepe, Y. (2012). Comparison of blastocyst development and cycle outcome in patients with eSET using either conventional or time lapse incubators. A prospective study of good prognosis patients. Journal of Reproductive and Stem Cell Biotechnology, 3, 55–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/205891581200300204.
- Kirkegaard, K., Hindkjaer, J.J., Grøndahl, M.L., Kesmodel, U.S., & Ingerslev, H.J. (2012). A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 565–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9750-x.
- Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K.M., Ramsing, N.B., & Remohi, J. (2011). The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Human Reproduction, 26, 2658–2671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der256.
- Nakahara, T., Iwase, A., Goto, M., Harata, T., Suzuki, M., Ienaga, M., … Ando, H. (2010). Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 93–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9385-8.
- Park, H., Bergh, C., Selleskog, U., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., & Lundin, K. (2015). No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: Results from an RCT. Human Reproduction, 30, 268–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu316.
- Payne, D., Flaherty, S.P., Barry, M.F., & Matthews, C.D. (1997). Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Human Reproduction, 12, 532–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.3.532.
- Roberts, S.A., Hirst, W.M., Brison, D.R., & Vail, A; towardSET collaboration. (2010). Embryo and uterine influences on IVF outcomes: an analysis of a UK multi-centre cohort. Human Reproduction, 25, 2792–2802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq213.
- Rubio, I., Galán, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014). Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: A randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 1287–1294.e5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738.
- Sciorio, R., Thong, J.K., & Pickering, S.J. (2018). Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35, 515–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1100-6.
- Vajta, G., Korösi, T., Du, Y., Nakata, K., Ieda, S., Kuwayama, M., & Nagy, Z.P. (2008). The Well-of-the-Well system: An efficient approach to improve embryo development. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17, 73–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60296-9.
- Wu, Y.-G., Lazzaroni-Tealdi, E., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Barad, D.H., Kushnir, V.A., … Gleicher, N. (2016). Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 14, 49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0181-x.