What do Sunni Muslims think about religiously forbidden reproductive options?

References

• Abu-Rabia, A. (2013). Infertility and surrogacy in Islamic society: Socio-cultural, psychological, ethical, and religious dilemmas. The Open Psychology Journal, 6(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101306010054
   Google Scholar
• Arshad, M. R., & Bin Masood, F.; Department of Philosophy University of the Punjab, Pakistan. (2019). Discourse on the significance of rituals in religious socialization. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 09 (02), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.92.10.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, M. M., Ugurel, V., & Elter, K. (2017). The attitudes of fertile and infertile women to Oocyte donation in a Muslim and Secular population. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(5), 1260–1264. ‏ https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.335.13556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athar, S. (2008). Enhancement technologies and the person: An Islamic view. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00237.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S. T., Goktolga, U., & Baser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89(4), 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokek-Cohen, Y., & Tarabeih, M. (2020). Forbidden medically-assisted sex selection in Sunni Muslim patients: A qualitative study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 41(3), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokek-Cohen, Y., Marey-Sarwan, I., & Tarabeih, M. (2021). Violating religious prohibitions for the sake of preserving family integrity and harmony and continuing the family lineage. A manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2006a). Islam, kinship and the new reproductive technology. Anthropology Today, 22(5), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2006.00460.x.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2006b). Shiite perspectives on kinship and new reproductive technologies. Review of the International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World, 17, 26–27. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/17060
   Google Scholar
• Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 38(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00471.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürtin, Z. B., Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2015). Islam and assisted reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing the Sunni Arab world, Shia Iran and secular Turkey. In S. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map. (pp. 3137–3153). Springer. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_165.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, R., Husain, F., Gudi, A., Brincat, M., & Shah, A. (2018). Religious attitudes to gamete donation. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 231, 204–209. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, F. A. (2000). Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Human Fertility, 3(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2006a). He won’t be my son”: Middle Eastern Muslim men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2006.20.1.94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2006b). Fatwas and ARTs: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 9, 291–317. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/984006
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2011). Globalization and gametes: reproductive "tourism", Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity. Anthropology and Medicine, 18(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2010.525876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab men: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P., & Serour, G. I. (2010). Third-party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21(7), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M., Ozgur, K., Donmez, L., & Stones-Abbasi, A. (2006). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: first data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 21(1), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesudason, S., & Baruch, S. (2012). Sex selection: what role for providers. Contraception, 86, 597–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Duke University Press. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Kanaaneh, R. A. (2002). Birthing the nation: Strategies of Palestinian women in Israel. (Vol. 2). University of California Press. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Kandemir, A., & Budd, R. (2018). Using vignettes to explore reality and values with young people. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2)‏, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.2.2914.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., & Konje, J. C. (2018). Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 232, 5–9. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilani, Z., & Hassan, L. H. (2002). Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis at The Farah Hospital. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 4(1), 68–70. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61918-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilic, S., Ucar, M., Yaren, H., Gulec, M., Atac, A., Demirel, F., Karabulut, C., & Demirel, O. (2009). Determination of the attitudes of Turkish infertile women towards surrogacy & oocyte donation. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(1), 36–40. http://pjms.com.pk/issues/janmar09/abstract/article6.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai-Wan, C. C., Blyth, E., & Hoi-Yan, C. C. (2006). Attitudes to and practices regarding sex selection in China. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26(7), 610–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampiao, F. (2013). What do male students at the college of medicine of the university of Malawi say about semen donation? TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 12(1), 75. ‏ https://doi.org/10.5455/pmb.1-1333353810
   Google Scholar
• Larijani, B., & Zahedi, F. (2007). Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A. G., Alzoubi, K. H., Khabour, O. F., & Alfaqih, M. A. (2018). Perspectives and attitudes of Jordanian medical and paramedical students toward surrogate pregnancy. International Journal of Women's Health, 10, 617. ‏https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S184434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, J. (2003). Legitimising surrogacy in Israel: Religious perspectives. In R. Cook, S. D. Sclater, & F. Kaganas (Eds.), Surrogate motherhood: International perspectives. (pp. 243–260). Oregon Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Şenol, D. K., Yılmaz, S. D., Bal, M. D., Beji, N. K., Çalışkan, S., & Urman, B. (2019). Views of Turkish people on oocyte and sperm donation. Cukurova Medical Journal, 44(1), 118–126. ‏ https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.438226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serour, G. I. (2008). Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17 Suppl (3), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60328-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serour, G. I. (2013). Ethical issues in human reproduction: Islamic perspectives. Gynecological Endocrinology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 29(11), 949–952. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.825714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serour, G. I., Rizk, B., Abdallah, M. A., & Silber, S. J. (2005). Religious perspectives of ethical issues in ART. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 10(3), 185–190. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511547287.076.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. (2015). Foundations of the consensus against surrogacy arrangements in Islamic Law. Islamic Law and Society, 22(1-2), 82–113. ‏https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02212p03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Balen, F., & Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Son preference, sex selection, and the "new" new reproductive technologies. International Journal of Health Services, 33(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.2190/PP5X-V039-3QGK-YQJB
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar