Counselling challenges associated with donor conception and surrogacy treatments – time for debate

References

• Benward, J. (2015). Mandatory counseling for gamete donation recipients: Ethical dilemmas. Fertility and Sterility, 104(3), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E. (2012). Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: Is there an emerging trend? Human Reproduction, 27(7), 2046–2057. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 769–789.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boivin, J., & Gameiro, S. (2015). Evolution of psychology and counseling in infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 104(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, A. M. (2015). Mental health counseling in third-party reproduction in the United States: Evaluation, psychoeducation or ethical gatekeeping? Fertility and Sterility, 104(3), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Fertility Society. (2020). Guidance for the care of fertility patients during the Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/2020/03/18/guidance-for-the-care-of-fertility-patients-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic/
   Google Scholar
• British Infertility Counselling Association (BICA). (2019). Guidelines for good practice in fertility counselling (4th ed.). Retrieved from www.bica.net/publications
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. (2018). Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: The fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins. Human Fertility, 21(4), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Daniels, K. (2019). Revisiting the use of ‘counselling’ as a means of preparing prospective parents to meet the emerging psychosocial needs of families that have used gamete donation. Families, Relationships and Societies, 8(3), 395–340. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674318X15313158773308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. (2015). Understanding and managing relationships in donor assisted families. In K. Fine (Ed.), Donor conception for life: Psychoanalytic reflections on new ways of conceiving the family. (pp. 181–201). Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Lacey, S., Peterson, K., & McMillan, J. (2015). Child interests in assisted reproductive technology: How is the welfare principle applied in practice? Human Reproduction, 30(3), 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018). Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Dancet, E., de Klerk, C., Emery, M., Lewis-Jones, C., Thorn, P., Van den Broeck, U. 2., Venetis, C., Verhaak, C. M., Wischmann, T., & Vermeulen, N. (2015). ESHRE guideline: Routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction-a guide for fertility staff. Human Reproduction, 30(11), 2476–2485. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V. M., Daniels, K. R., & Gillett, W. (2008). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66(2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim, L. Z., Newton, C. R., MacLean-Brine, D., & Feyles, V. (2012). Evaluation of preparatory psychosocial counselling for medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction, 27(7), 2058–2066. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: How genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2019). Code of practice (9th ed.). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Retrieved from https://portal.hfea.gov.uk/media/1605/2019-12-03-code-of-practice-december-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) – previous updates for professionals. Retrieved from https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/covid-19-and-fertility-treatment/coronavirus-covid-19-previous-updates-for-professionals/
   Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., & Lampic, C. (2021). The interaction between donor-conceived families and their environment: Parents' perceptions of societal understanding and attitudes regarding their family-building. Human Fertility, 24(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2018.1533256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Bolt, S. H., & Maas, J. (2021). Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: Psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2019). Managing absence and presence of child-parent resemblance: A challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 8, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, E., Macvarish, J., & Sheldon, S. (2014). Assessing child welfare under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: A case study in medicalisation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(4), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, J. (2020). Child welfare assessments and the regulation of access to publicly funded fertility treatment. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 10, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowik, A. J. (2018). Reproducing eugenics, reproducing while trans: The state sterilization of trans people. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(5), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1393361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, G., & Gilbert, P. (2015). Implications counselling for people considering donor-assisted treatment. York: BICA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norre, J., & Wischmann, T. (2011). The position of the fertility counsellor in a fertility team: A critical appraisal. Human Fertility, 14(3), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2011.580824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasch, L. A. (2018). New realities for the practice of egg donation: A family-building perspective. Fertility and Sterility, 110(7), 1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, N., Seenan, S., & van den Akker, O. (2019). Experiences of involuntary childlessness and treatment in the UK: What has changed in 20 years? Human Fertility, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2019.1687946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pericleous-Smith, A., Dark, S., McCluskey, G., Mizen, L., & Crawshaw, M. (2021). Survey of fertility counselling provision in UK licensed treatment centres during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Human Fertility, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1898053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PROGAR. (2019). Response to Law Commissions’ Consultation on Surrogacy Law Reform. Retrieved from https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_40000-5_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, A. (2015). It takes a second to be a father but a lifetime to be a daddy.” Men’s experiences of infertility and donor conception. In K. Fine (Ed.), Donor conception for life: Psychoanalytic reflections on new ways of conceiving the family (pp. 95–128). Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, A., Bos, H., van Rooij, F., Gerrits, T., van der Veen, F., Mochtar, M., & Visser, M. (2019). Being a donor-child: Wishes for parental support, peer support and counseling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 40(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1396313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, A. M., van Rooij, F. B., de Reus, E., Schoonenberg, M., van der Veen, F., Visser, M., Bos, H., & Mochtar, M. H. (2020). Psychosocial counselling in donor sperm treatment: Unmet needs and mental health among heterosexual, lesbian and single women. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 41(5), 885–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, M., Kop, P. A. L., van Wely, M., van der Veen, F., Gerrits, G. J. E., & van Zwieten, M. C. B. (2012). Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring: A search for facts. Facts, Views and Visions in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4(3), 159–172. https://fvvo.eu/archive/volume-4/number-3/structured-review/counselling-on-disclosure-of-gamete-donation-to-donor-offspring-a-search-for-facts/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser, M., Gerrits, T., Kop, F., van der Veen, F., & Mochtar, M. (2016). Exploring parents' feelings about counseling in donor sperm treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(4), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.119580 https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1195806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. L., Wester, S. R., & Larson, L. M. (2007). Avoidance of counselling: Psychological factors that inhibit seeking help. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar