Similar implantation competence in euploid blastocysts developed on day 5 or day 6 in young women: a retrospective cohort study

References

• Barrenetxea, G., López de Larruzea, A., Ganzabal, T., Jiménez, R., Carbonero, K., & Mandiola, M. (2005). Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertility and Sterility, 83(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia, R., Vento, M. E., Ragusa, M., Barbagallo, D., La Ferlita, A., Di Emidio, G., Borzí, P., Artini, P. G., Scollo, P., Tatone, C., Purrello, M., & Di Pietro, C. (2016). MicroRNAs are stored in human MII oocyte and their expression profile changes in reproductive aging. Biology of Reproduction, 95(6), 131. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.116.142711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briley, S. M., Jasti, S., McCracken, J. M., Hornick, J. E., Fegley, B., Pritchard, M. T., & Duncan, F. E. (2016). Reproductive age-associated fibrosis in the stroma of the mammalian ovary. Reproduction, 152(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capalbo, A., Rienzi, L., Cimadomo, D., Maggiulli, R., Elliott, T., Wright, G., Nagy, Z. P., & Ubaldi, F. M. (2014). Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Human Reproduction, 29(6), 1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demko, Z. P., Simon, A. L., McCoy, R. C., Petrov, D. A., & Rabinowitz, M. (2016). Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening. Fertility and Sterility, 105(5), 1307–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Q. Y., Wang, E. Y., Huang, Y., Guo, X. Y., Xiong, Y. J., Yu, Y. P., Yao, G. D., Shi, S. L., & Sun, Y. P. (2016). Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 105(4), 910–919.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, F. E., Jasti, S., Paulson, A., Kelsh, J. M., Fegley, B., & Gerton, J. L. (2017). Age-associated dysregulation of protein metabolism in the mammalian oocyte. Aging Cell, 16(6), 1381–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E. J., Tao, X., Ferry, K. M., Taylor, D., Treff, N. R., & Scott, R. T. Jr.(2012). Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Human Reproduction, 27(4), 1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franasiak, J. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Werner, M. D., Upham, K. M., Treff, N. R., & Scott, R. T. Jr. (2014). The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: A review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertility and Sterility, 101(3), 656–663.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000). Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 73(6), 1155–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, E. R., Cree, L. M., & Morbeck, D. E. (2018). Should extended blastocyst culture include Day 7? Human Reproduction, 33(6), 991–997. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, S., Amo, A., Hama, S., Ito, K., Nakaoka, Y., & Morimoto, Y. (2013). Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Human Reproduction, 28(6), 1528–1535. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, M., O'Neill, C., Palermo, G. D., Xu, K., Zhang, C., Qin, X., Zhan, Q., Clarke, R. N., Ye, Z., Zaninovic, N., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2018). Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility, 110(1), 95–102.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, M., Reichman, D., Robles, A., Melnick, A., Davis, O., Zaninovic, N., Xu, K., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2017). Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertility and Sterility, 107(3), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. J., Melnick, A. P., Stewart, J. D., Xu, K., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2016). Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits? Fertility and Sterility, 106(3), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, K., Sundvall, L., Erlandsen, M., Hindkjaer, J. J., Knudsen, U. B., & Ingerslev, H. J. (2015). Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin. Human Reproduction, 31(2), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroener, L., Ambartsumyan, G., Briton-Jones, C., Dumesic, D., Surrey, M., Munné, S., & Hill, D. (2012). The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertility and Sterility, 98(4), 876–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.01414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir, V. A., Darmon, S. K., Albertini, D. F., Barad, D. H., & Gleicher, N. (2016). Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011–2012. Fertility and Sterility, 106(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, F. L., Fortier, A. L., Darricarrère, N., Chan, D., Arnold, D. R., & Trasler, J. M. (2009). Reproductive and epigenetic outcomes associated with aging mouse oocytes. Human Molecular Genetics, 18(11), 2032–2044. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasi, M. G., Colasante, A., Riccio, T., Ruberti, A., Casciani, V., Scarselli, F., Spinella, F., Fiorentino, F., Varricchio, M. T., & Greco, E. (2016). Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: A consecutive case series study. Human Reproduction, 31(10), 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumusoglu, S., Yarali, I., Bozdag, G., Ozdemir, P., Polat, M., Sokmensuer, L. K., & Yarali, H. (2017). Time-lapse morphokinetic assessment has low to moderate ability to predict euploidy when patient- and ovarian stimulation-related factors are taken into account with the use of clustered data analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 107(2), 413–421.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, S. A., Morin, S. J., Franasiak, J. M., Goodman, L. R., Juneau, C. R., Forman, E. J., Werner, M. D., & Scott, R. T. Jr.(2018). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility, 110(5), 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, V., Ingerslev, H. J., & Kirkegaard, K. (2017). Elective embryo transfers on day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on day 5. Human Reproduction, 32(6), 1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, J., Wang, Z. B., Feng, H. L., Miao, Y. L., Wang, Q., Yu, Y., Wei, Y. C., Yan, J., Wang, W. H., Shen, W., Sun, S. C., Schatten, H., & Sun, Q. Y. (2014). The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: Current status and future perspects. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 38, 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2013.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, C., Bellver, J., Rodrigo, L., Castillón, G., Guillén, A., Vidal, C., Giles, J., Ferrando, M., Cabanillas, S., Remohí, J., Pellicer, A., & Simón, C. (2017). In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: A randomized, controlled study. Fertility and Sterility, 107(5), 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, T., Dzidic, N., Strecker, M. N., Commander, S., Travis, M. K., Doherty, C., Tyson, R. W., Mendoza, A. E., Stephenson, M., Dise, C. A., Benito, C. W., Ziadie, M. S., & Hovanes, K. (2017). Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: Outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genetics in Medicine, 19(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. T. Jr., Ferry, K., Su, J., Tao, X., Scott, K., & Treff, N. R. (2012). Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: A prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertility and Sterility, 97(4), 870–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. T. Jr., Upham, K. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Scott, K. L., Taylor, D., Tao, X., & Treff, N. R. (2013). Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: A randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility, 100(3), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B. S., Daneshmand, S. T., Garner, F. C., Aguirre, M., & Ross, R. (2008). Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertility and Sterility, 89(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, A. L., Kiehl, M., Fischer, E., Proctor, J. G., Bush, M. R., Givens, C., Rabinowitz, M., & Demko, Z. P. (2018). Pregnancy outcomes from more than 1,800 in vitro fertilization cycles with the use of 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility, 110(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. H., Patrick, J. L., Gitlin, S. A., Wilson, J. M., Crain, J. L., & Griffin, D. K. (2014). Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29(3), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. M., Onwubalili, N., Brown, K., Jindal, S. K., & McGovern, P. G. (2013). Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): A national study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30(12), 1577–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0100-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiegs, A. W., Sun, L., Patounakis, G., & Scott, R. T. (2019). Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Human Reproduction, 34(9), 1632–1639. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Abbeel, E., Balaban, B., Ziebe, S., Lundin, K., Cuesta, M. J., Klein, B. M., Helmgaard, L., & Arce, J. C. (2013). Association between blastocyst morphology and outcome of single-blastocyst transfer. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, B. J., & Dokras, A. (2008). Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertility and Sterility, 89(1), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Yang, Q., Dai, S., Li, G., Jin, H., Yao, G., & Sun, Y. (2016). Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(7), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Liu, J., Collins, G. S., Salem, S. A., Liu, X., Lyle, S. S., Peck, A. C., Sills, E. S., & Salem, R. D. (2012). Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: Results from a randomized pilot study. Molecular Cytogenetics, 5(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-5-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar