References
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. A. (2015a). Becoming familiar with eternal anonymity: How sperm banks use relationship marketing strategy. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2014.935938
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. A. (2015b). How do anonymous sperm donors signal credibility through their self-presentations? Health Sociology Review, 24(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2015.1004800
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. A. (2016). How are marketing strategies of genetic material used as a mechanism for biopolitical governmentality? Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(6), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1137897
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., Peres, Y., & Kanazawa, S. (2008). Rational choice and evolutionary psychology as explanations for mate selectivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(2), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099356
- Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30.
- Buss, D. M. (2013). Mate preferences questionnaire. Measurement instrument database for the social sciences. http://www.midss.org/content/mate-preferences-questionnaire
- Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Routledge.
- Drewes, C. T. (2009). Anonymous sperm donor preferences of non-genetic mothers. Thesis submitted as partial fulfillment of the Master’s degree at Smith College.
- Ferri-García, R., & Rueda, M. (2020). Propensity score adjustment using machine learning classification algorithms to control selection bias in online surveys. PloS One, 15(4), e0231500. . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231500
- Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166
- Furnham, A., Salem, N., & Lester, D. (2014). Selecting egg and sperm donors: The role of age, social class, ethnicity, height and personality. Psychology, 05(03), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.53033
- Gith, E., & Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2019). Choosing Genes without Jeans: Do Evolutionary psychological mechanisms have an impact on thinking distortions in sperm donor preferences among heterosexual sperm recipients? Human Fertility, 1–9. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2019.1700560
- Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
- Harding, B., Egan, R., Kannu, P., & MacKenzie, J. J. (2017). Parents’ understanding of genetics and heritability. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(3), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0021-3
- Hayman, B., Wilkes, L., Halcomb, E., & Jackson, D. (2015). Lesbian women choosing motherhood: The journey to conception. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2014.921801
- Jones, C. (2005). Looking like a family: Negotiating bio-genetic continuity in British Lesbian families using licensed donor insemination. Sexualities, 8(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705050856
- Klock, S. C., Jacob, M. C., & Maier, D. (1996). A comparison of single and married recipients of donor insemination. Human Reproduction, 11(11), 2554–2557. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019159
- Newman, A. M. (2019). Mixing and matching: Sperm donor selection for interracial Lesbian couples. Medical Anthropology, 38(8), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2019.1655737
- Nordqvist, P. (2012). “I don’t want us to stand out more than we already do”: Lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities, 15(5–6), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712446271
- Ravelingien, A., Provoost, V., Wyverkens, E., Buysse, A., De Sutter, P., & Pennings, G. (2015). Lesbian couples’ views about and experiences of not being able to choose their sperm donor. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.979883
- Rodino, I. S., Burton, P. J., & Sanders, K. A. (2011). Mating by proxy: A novel perspective to donor conception. Fertility and Sterility, 96(4), 998–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1090
- Scheib, J. E. (1994). Sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(3), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90035-3
- Scheib, J. E. (1997). Female choice in the context of donor insemination. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 489–504). Spring.
- Scheib, J. E., Kristiansen, A., & Wara, A. A. (1997). A Norwegian note on sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(96)00115-8
- Shaw, M. (2018). The familial and the familiar: Locating relatedness in Colombian donor conception. Medical Anthropology, 37(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1371149
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Chapter 13 Principal components and factor analysis. In Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
- Torgler, B., & Whyte, S. (2013). Selection Criteria in the search for a sperm donor: Internal versus External attributes (No. 2013-22). CREMA Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/214546
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Eds.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine.
- Turcan, P., Prochazka, M., Pokorny, P., Kvintova, J., Sigmund, M., & Juraskova, E. S. (2020). Desire for parenthood and associated trends in Czech Lesbian women. Sexual Medicine, 8(4), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.004
- Walther, C. S. (2014). Skin tone, biracial stratification and tri-racial stratification among sperm donors. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.696666
- Weissenberg, R., & Landau, R. (2012). Are two a family? Older single mothers assisted by sperm donation and their children revisited. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01187.x
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Selection criteria in the search for a sperm donor: Behavioural traits versus physical appearance. Journal of Bioeconomics, 17(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-014-9193-9
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2016). Determinants of online sperm donor success: How women choose. Applied Economics Letters, 23(8), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1090543
- Whyte, S., Torgler, B., & Harrison, K. L. (2016). What women want in their sperm donor: A study of more than 1000 women’s sperm donor selections. Economics and Human Biology, 23, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.06.001
- Wyverkens, E., Provoost, V., Ravelingien, A., De Sutter, P., Pennings, G., & Buysse, A. (2014). Beyond sperm cells: A qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families. Human Reproduction, 29(6), 1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu060
- Zeifman, D. M., & Ma, J. E. (2013). Experimental examination of women’s selection criteria for sperm donors versus life partners. Personal Relationships, 20(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01409.x