Hysteroscopicmetroplasty as a treatment option for women with congenital dysmorphic uterus suffering from impaired reproductive performance

References

• Akhtar, M. A., Saravelos, S. H., Li, T. C., & Jayaprakasan, K. (2020). Reproductive implications and management of congenital uterine anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 62 November 2019. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 127(5), e1–e13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15968
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A., Sandvik, L., Langebrekke, A., & Istre, O. (2009). A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery. Fertility and Sterility, 91(4), 1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M. J., & Goldstein, D. P. (1980). Impaired reproductive performance in DES-exposed women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55(1), 25–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho Neto, M. A., Ludwin, A., Petraglia, F., & Martins, W. P. (2021). Definition, prevalence, clinical relevance and treatment of T-shaped uterus: Systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Florio, P., Nazzaro, G., Spinelli, M., Paladini, D., Di Carlo, C., & Nappi, C. (2015). Hysteroscopic outpatient metroplasty to expand dysmorphic uteri (HOME-DU technique): A pilot study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 30(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, H., Garbin, O., Castaigne, V., Gervaise, A., & Levaillant, J. M. (2011). Surgical approach to and reproductive outcome after surgical correction of a T-shaped uterus. Human Reproduction, 26(7), 1730–1734. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, H., Gervaise, A., & de Tayrac, R. (2000). Operative hysteroscopy for infertility using normal saline solution and a coaxial bipolar electrode: A pilot study. Human Reproduction, 15(8), 1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbin, O., Ohl, J., Bettahar-Lebugle, K., & Dellenbach, P. (1998). Hysteroscopic metroplasty in diethylstilboestrol-exposed and hypoplastic uterus: A report on 24 cases. Human Reproduction, 13(10), 2751–2755. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.10.2751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomucci, E., Bellavia, E., Sandri, F., Farina, A., & Scagliarini, G. (2011). Term delivery rate after hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion and T-shaped, arcuate and septate uterus. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 71(3), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000317266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimbizis, G. F., Gordts, S., Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Brucker, S., De Angelis, C., Gergolet, M., Li, T.-C., Tanos, V., Brölmann, H., Gianaroli, L., & Campo, R. (2013). The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Human Reproduction, 28(8), 2032–2044. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, H. A., Li, T. C., & Cooke, I. D. (2000). The septate uterus: A review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertility and Sterility, 73(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00480-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Z., Ben-Arie, A., Lurie, S., Manor, M., & Insler, V. (1996). Beneficial effect of hysteroscopic metroplasty on the reproductive outcome in a ‘T-shaped’ uterus. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 41(1), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000292033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. C. (2004). Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. Journal of Women’s Health, 13(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1089/154099904322836438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. C., Bhatnagar, K. P., Nettleton, G. S., & Nakajima, S. T. (2002). Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 78(5), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03368-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. C., & Malo, J. W. (1993). Hysteroscopic metroplasty in the diethylstilbestrol-exposed uterus and similar nonfusion anomalies: Effects on subsequent reproductive performance; a preliminary report. Fertility and Sterility, 59(3), 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55789-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackow, B. W., & Arici, A. (2007). Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 19(3), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b0649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravelos, S. H., Cocksedge, K. A., & Li, T. C. (2008). Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: A critical appraisal. Human Reproduction Update, 14(5), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şükür, Y. E., Yakıştıran, B., Özmen, B., Sönmezer, M., Berker, B., & Atabekoğlu, C. (2018). Hysteroscopic corrections for complete septate and T-shaped uteri have similar surgical and reproductive outcome. Reproductive Sciences, 25(12), 1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118756774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American Fertility Society. (1988). The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertility and Sterility, 49(6), 944–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar