The case for reframing known donation

References

• Andreassen, R. (2017). New kinships, new family formations and negotiations of intimacy via social media sites. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, N., & Delacroix, C. (2019). Bypassing the sperm bank: Documenting the experiences of online informal sperm donors. Critical Public Health, 29(5), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1492704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, S. (2007). Enforcing the child’s right to know her origins: Contrasting approaches under the convention on the rights of the child and the European Convention on Human Rights. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm003
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Harrison, S., Perez, M. J., & Kirkman-Brown, J. (2021). UK guidelines for the medical and laboratory procurement and use of sperm, oocyte and embryo donors. Human Fertility, 24(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2019.1622040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummerford, M., & Dingle, S. (2019). Conclusions. Donor-conceived and surrogate-born people heard for the first time at the UN during the 30th Anniversary Convention on the Rights of the Child. 30th Anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Geneva. Retrieved March 16, 2022, from https://www.donorkinderen.com/united-nations-2019
   Google Scholar
• Darroch, F., & Smith, I. (2021). Establishing identity: How direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing challenges the assumption of donor anonymity. Family Court Review, 59(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, D., Nordqvist, P., & Kelly, F. (2021). Beyond secrecy and openness: Telling a relational story about children’s best interests in donor-conceived families. BioSocieties, 2021, 9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00225-9
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L. (2001). Gamete donation and anonymity: The ethical and legal debate. Human Reproduction, 16(5), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.5.818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L. (2013). Donor conception and mandatory paternity testing: The right to know and the right to be told. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(5), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.776137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, K., Glover, L., & Abel, P. (2004). Masculinity, infertility, stigma and media reports. Social Science & Medicine, 59(6), 1169–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, L., & Nordqvist, P. (2018). Organizing openness: How UK policy defines the significance of information and information sharing about gamete donation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 32(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eby014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, L. (2017). Qualifying kinship: How do UK gamete donors negotiate identity-release donation? [PhD Thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, M., Guichon, J. R., & Mitchell, I. (2012). The right to know one’s origins: Assisted human reproduction and the best interests of children. ASP Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., & Daniels, K. (2017). The discourse of gifting in Embryo Donation: The understandings of donors, recipients, and counselors. Qualitative Health Research, 27(9), 1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316672646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Gamble, H., & Thurlow, R. (2021). Motivations for egg donation to previously unknown recipients: Donation as a personal, relational act of giving. Human Fertility, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.2005263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2022). The opposite of a step parent – The genetics without any of the emotion: ‘Sperm donors’ reflections on identity-release donation and relatedness. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 14, 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.06.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, S., Freeman, T., & Jadva, V. (2019). A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank. Human Reproduction, 34(11), 2208–2218. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes, E., & Weiner, K. (2000). ‘Everybody’s got a dad…’. Issues for lesbian families in the management of donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(4), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, J., Jackson, E., Spoelstra-Witjens, L., & Reisel, D. (2017). Using an introduction website to start a family: Implications for users and health practitioners. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.02.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: How genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2019). Random families: Genetic strangers, sperm donor siblings, and the creation of new kin. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA. (2022a). Home insemination with donor sperm. HFEA. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/donation/donors/home-insemination-with-donor-sperm/ Accessed 1.2.22.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA. (2022b). In Vitro Fertilisation. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/in-vitro-fertilisation-ivf/ Accessed 1.2.22.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA. (2022c). Using donated eggs, sperm or embryos in treatment. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/using-donated-eggs-sperm-or-embryos-in-treatment/ Accessed 1.2.22.
   Google Scholar
• Homanen, R. (2018). Reproducing whiteness and enacting kin in the Nordic context of transnational egg donation: Matching donors with cross-border traveller recipients in Finland. Social Science & Medicine, 203, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2018). Why search for a sperm donor online? The experiences of women searching for and contacting sperm donors on the internet. Human Fertility, 21(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1315460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, O. (2021). BPAS Fertility Investigation: NHS-funded fertility care for female same-sex couples. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.bpas.org/media/3484/bpas-fertility-investigation-nhs-funded-fertility-care-for-female-same-sex-couples.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. (2010). Out of sight, out of mind: Family resemblances in lesbian donor conception. Sociology, 44(6), 1128–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510381616
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. (2014). Bringing kinship into being: Connectedness, donor conception and lesbian parenthood. Sociology, 48(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513477936
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P., & Gilman, L. (2022). Donors: Curious connections in donor conception. Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative strangers: Family life, genes and donor conception. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelingien, A., Provoost, V., Wyverkens, E., Buysse, A., De Sutter, P., & Pennings, G. (2015). Lesbian couples’ views about and experiences of not being able to choose their sperm donor. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.979883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib, J. E. (1994). Sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(3), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90035-3
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. (2007). The gift-exchange and reciprocity of women in donor-assisted conception. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2013). Tangling the web of legal parenthood: Legal responses to the use of known donors in lesbian parenting arrangements. Legal Studies, 33(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, F., Turner-Moore, T., Pacey, A., & Jones, G. L. (2022). Are UK policies and practices for regulated donor insemination forcing women to find unregulated sperm donors online? A perspective on the available evidence. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 3, 644591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.644591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• yourSAy. (2021). Donor Conception Register established in South Australia [Government of South Australia]. https://yoursay.sa.gov.au/art-act-amendments/news_feed/donor-conception-register-established-in-south-australia
   Google Scholar