Make our wellbeing a priority: donor-conceived adults call for ongoing support and conversation about their donor conception

References

• Allan, S. (2016). Donor identification: Victorian legislation gives rights to all donor-conceived people. Family Matters, 98, 43–55. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3010387
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2020). Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. In K. Beier, C. Brügge, P. Thorn & C. Wiesemann (Eds.), Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter (pp. 361–388). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60298-0_24
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Canzi, E., Accordini, M., & Facchin, F. (2019). ‘Is blood thicker than water?’ Donor conceived offspring’s subjective experiences of the donor: a systematic narrative review. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 38(5), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. (2018). Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins. Human Fertility, 21(4), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Daniels, K. (2019). Revisiting the use of ‘counselling’ as a means of preparing prospective parents to meet the emerging psychosocial needs of families that have used gamete donation. Families Relationships and Societies, 8(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674318X15313158773308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. (2020). The Perspective of Adult Donor Conceived Persons. In K. Beier, C. Brügge, P. Thorn & C. Wiesemann (Eds.), Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter (pp. 443–489). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60298-0_29
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Grace, V., & Gillett, W. (2011). Factors associated with parents’ decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring’s donor conception. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 26(10), 2783–2790. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, A. (2022). Secret sperm donors and the DNA unravelling the truth. New Zealand Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/secret-sperm-donors-and-the-dna-unravelling-the-truth/2DD7JTK4NE4CAXWN4JMCG5ERSM/
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T. (2015). Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review, 33(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0018-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & Van den Akker, O. (2018). Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glidden, A., Thibaut, D., & Goodman, J. (2022). The impact of the method of genetic identity disclosure on the donor conceived adult. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 43(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2030307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S. (2017). Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(7), 1532–1536. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golombok, S. (2020). The psychological wellbeing of ART children: what have we learned from 40 years of research? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 41(4), 743–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Blake, L., Casey, P., Roman, G., & Jadva, V. (2013). Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 54(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Jadva, V., Lycett, E., Murray, C., & MacCallum, F. (2005). Families created by gamete donation: follow-up at age 2. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 20(1), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Murray, C., Jadva, V., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., & Rust, J. (2006). Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3. Human Reproduction, 21(7), 1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act. (2004). Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 No 92 (as at 01 July 2022), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0092/latest/whole.html
   Google Scholar
• Ilioi, E., Blake, L., Jadva, V., Roman, G., & Golombok, S. (2017). The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 58(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Bolt, S., & Maas, A. (2022). Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 25(4), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Maas, J., McCormick, E., Benward, J., & Scheib, J. (2021). Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors: a systematic review. Fertility & Sterility Reviews, 2(2), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 24(8), 1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic, C., Skoog Svanberg, A., Gudmundsson, J., Leandersson, P., Solensten, N.-G., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., Wånggren, K., & Sydsjö, G. (2022). National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor—experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 37(3), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostyn, A. (2017). Donor conception and its impact on family constructs – the views and experiences of donor-conceived persons. [Master’s thesis] The University of Canterbury, UC research Repository. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/14133
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. (2021). Telling Reproductive Stories: Social Scripts, Relationality and Donor Conception. Sociology, 55(4), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520981860
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination source. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 22(9), 2566–2571. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G. (2017). Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(5), 969–973. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, A., Bos, H., van Rooij, F., Gerrits, T., van der Veen, F., Mochtar, M., & Visser, M. (2019). Being a donor-child: wishes for parental support, peer support and counselling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 40(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1396313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 15(9), 2041–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O. B. A., Crawshaw, M. A., Blyth, E. D., & Frith, L. J. (2015). Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Human Reproduction, 30(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). (2022a). Legislation and guidelines. https://www.varta.org.au/regulation/legislation-and-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Victoria Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). (2022b). About, and Donor conception services. https://www.varta.org.au/about
   Google Scholar
• Widbom, A., Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2021). Positioning the donor in a new landscape—mothers’ and fathers’ experiences as their adult children obtained information about the identity-release sperm donor. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 36(8), 2181–2188. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widbom, A., Sydsjö, G., & Lampic, C. (2022). Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or spermatozoa from identity-release donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 45(5), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweifel, J. (2015). Donor conception from the viewpoint of the child: positives, negatives, and promoting the welfare of the child. Fertility and Sterility, 104(3), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar