An analysis model of creating a core journal collection for academic libraries

References

• Altmann, K.G. & Gorman, G.E. (1999). Can impact factors substitute for the results of local use studies? Findings from an Australian case study. Collection Building, 18(2), 90-94.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, C.P. (1975). Planning serials cancellations and cooperative collection development in the health sciences: Methodology and background information. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 63(4), 366-377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrell, Q.L. (1985). The 80/20 rule: Library lore or statistical law?. Journal of Documentation, 41, 124-139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burright, M.A., Hahn, T.B. & Antonisse, M.J. (2005). Understanding information use in a multidisciplinary field: A local citation analysis of neuroscience research. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 198-210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, G.D. & Koenig, E.D. (1978). Systematic serials selection analysis in a small academic health sciences library. Bulletin of Medical Libraries Association, 66(4), 397-406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chrzastowski, T.E. (1991). Journal collection cost-effectiveness in an academic chemistry library: Results of a cost-use survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Collection Management, 14(1–2), 85-98.
   Google Scholar
• Chrzastowski, T.E. & Olesko, B.M. (1997). Chemistry journal use and cost: Results of a longitudinal study. Library Resources and Technical Services, 41(2), 101-111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H.K. (2007). Evaluating academic journals using impact factor and local citation score. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 393-402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulle, F.W.Lwehabura, M.F.Matovelo, D.S.Mulimila, R.T. (2004). Creating a core journal collection for agricultural research in Tanzania: Citation analysis and user opinion techniques. Library Review, 53(5), 270-277.
   Google Scholar
• Haaslow, R. & Sverrung, A. (1995). Deselection of serials: The Chalmers University of technology library method. Collection Management, 19(3/4), 151-170.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R.K. (1990). Journal deselection in a biomedical research library: A mediated mathematical approach. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 78(1), 45-48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S.Y. & Lee, C.S. (2004). Analysis of evaluation indicators for the development of evaluation models of foreign academic journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(2), 45-67.
   Google Scholar
• Kreider, Janice (1999). The correlation of local citation data with citation data from journal citation reports. Library Resource & Technical Services, 43(1), 28-36.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, John D. (2006). Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1-13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, D. & Tiffany, B.A. (1991). Cost-per-use method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serials: A detailed discussion of methodology. Serials Review, 17(2), 7-14.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (1996). Determining Measures of the Quality and Impact of Journals. Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Nisonger, T.E. (2000). Use of the journal citation reports for serials management in research libraries: An investigation of the effect of self-citation on journal rankings in library and information science and genetics. College and Research Libraries, 61(3), 263-275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scigliano, M. (2000). Serial use in a small academic library: Determining cost-effectiveness. Serial Review, 26(1), 43-52.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J.A. (1986). Journal deselection: A literature review and an application. Sci Technon Libr., 6(3), 25-42.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T.E. (1985). Journal citation reports as a deselection tool. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 73(4), 387-389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sridhar, M.S. (1988). Is cost benefit analysis applicable to journal use in special libraries?. Serials Librarian, 15(1/2), 137-153.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvia, M.J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal collection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1), 20-28.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, R.L. (1985). Some behavioral patterns of library users: The 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43, 24-39.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, G. & Oldman, C. (1977). An examination of cost-benefit approaches to the evaluation of library and information services. W. Lancaster(Ed.), Evaluation and Scientific Management of Libraries and Information Centres, Leiden: Noordhoff Leyden.
   Google Scholar