723
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Issue Generating Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Evaluation Theory and Practice?

Pages 549-568 | Published online: 13 Dec 2011

References

  • Alexander , E. 2001 . The planner-prince: Interdependence, rationalities and post-communicative practice . Planning theory and Practice , 2 : 311 – 324 .
  • Alexander , E. 2006 . “ Evaluation and status: Where is planning evaluation today and how did it get there? ” . In Evaluation in Planning—Evolution and Prospect , Edited by: Alexander , E. 3 – 18 . Aldershot : Ashgate .
  • Alfasi , N. 2004 . “ Public participation and democratization of urban planning ” . In Contemporary Israeli Geography , Edited by: Maos , J.O. , Inbar , M. and Shmueli , D. Haifa : University of Haifa Press . (special issue of Horizons in Geography vol. 60–61)
  • Allemdendiger , P. and Tewdwr-Jones , M. 2002 . The communicative turn in urban planning: Unraveling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions . Space and Policy , 6 : 5 – 24 .
  • Alterman , R. , Carmon , N. and Hill , M. 1984 . Integrated evaluation: A synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim social programs . Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 18 : 381 – 389 .
  • Alterman , R. and Hill , M. 1986 . “ Land use planning in Israel ” . In International Handbook on Land use Planning , Edited by: Patricios , N. 119 – 150 . New York : Greenwood Press .
  • Altshuler , A. 1965 . The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis , Ithaca, NY : Cornell University press .
  • Bickerstaff , K. and Walker , G. 2005 . Shared visions, unholy alliances: Power, governance and deliberative process in local transport planning . Urban Studies , 42 : 2123 – 2144 .
  • Buckly , M. 1988 . Multicriteria evaluation: Measures, manipulation and meaning . Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 15 : 55 – 64 .
  • Checkland , P. 2001 . “ Soft system methodology ” . In Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity Uncertainty and Conflict , Edited by: Rosenhead , J. and Mingers , J. 61 – 89 . Chichester : Wiley .
  • Dery , D. 1984 . Problem Definition in Policy Analysis , Lawrence, KS : University of Kansas Press .
  • Feitelson , E. forthcoming . “ Physical planning in Israel: Intermediating between government, society, capital and environment ” . In Construing Space in Israel: Settlements and Land Facets (in Hebrew) , Edited by: Hasson , S. Tel Aviv : Ramot .
  • Flyvberg , B. and Richardson , T. 2002 . “ Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory ” . In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory , Edited by: Allmendinger , P. and Tewdwr-Jones , M. 44 – 62 . London and New York : Routledge .
  • Fusco-Girard , L. , Cerrta , M. and De-Toro , P. 2005 . “ Integrated planning and integrated evaluation—Theoretical references and methodological approaches ” . In Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis- Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation , Edited by: Miller , D. and Patassini , D. 173 – 203 . Aldershot : Ashgate .
  • Hajer , M. and Wagenaar , H. 2003 . “ Introduction ” . In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , Edited by: Hajer , M.A. and Wagnaar , H. 1 – 29 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Hammond , J.S. , Keeney , R.L. and Raiffa , H. 1999 . Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions , (New York : Broadway Books .
  • Healy , P. 1993 . “ Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory ” . In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , Edited by: Fischer , F. and Forester , J. Durham, NC : Duke University Press .
  • Healy , P. 1997 . Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , London : Macmillan .
  • Hill , M. 1968 . A goals-achievement matrix for the evaluating alternative plans . Journal of the American Institute of Planners , 34 : 19 – 28 .
  • Hoch , C. 2007 . Making plans: Representation and intention . Planning Theory , 6 : 16 – 35 .
  • Hoch , C. 2009 . Panning craft: How planners compose plans . Planning Theory , 8 : 219 – 241 .
  • Imrie , R. 1996 . Transforming the social relations of research production in urban policy evaluation . Environment and Planning A , 28 : 1445 – 1464 .
  • Innes , J. 1996 . Planning through consensus building . Journal of the American Planning Association , 62 : 460 – 472 .
  • Innes , J. and Booher , D. 2003 . “ Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue ” . In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , Edited by: Hajer , M.A. and Wagenaar , H. 33 – 59 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Khakee , A. 1998 . Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts . Town Planning Review , 69 : 359 – 374 .
  • Khakee , A. 2003 . The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice . Evaluation , 9 : 340 – 352 .
  • Kingdon , J. 1984 . Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies , New York : Harper-Collins .
  • Lichfield , N. 1996 . Community Impact Evaluation , London : UCL Press .
  • Lichfield , N. 1970 . Evaluation methodology of urban and regional plans: a review . Regional Studies , 4 : 151 – 165 .
  • Lichfield , N. , Kettle , P. and Whitbread , M. 1975 . Evaluation in the Planning Process , Oxford : Pergamon .
  • Mingers , J. and Rosenhead , J. 2004 . Problem structuring methods in action . European Journal of Operational Research , 152 : 530 – 554 .
  • Nijkamp , P. and Rietveld , P. 1990 . Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning , Amsterdam : North Holland .
  • Nyborg , K. 2000 . Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators . Ecological Economics , 34 : 393 – 408 .
  • Nyborg , K. and Spangen , I. 2000 . Cost–benefit analysis and the democratic ideal . Nordic Journal of Political Economics , 26 : 83 – 93 .
  • Owens , S. , Rayner , T. and Bina , O. 2004 . New agendas for appraisal: Reflection on theory, practice and research . Environment and Planning A , 36 : 1943 – 1959 .
  • Rosenhead , J. 1980 . Planning under uncertainty: II. A methodology for robustness analysis . Journal of the Operational Research Society , 31 : 331 – 341 .
  • Rosenhead , J. and Mingers , J. 2001 . “ A new paradigm of analysis ” . In Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity Uncertainty and Conflict , Edited by: Rosenhead , J. and Mingers , J. 1 – 19 . Chichester : Wiley .
  • Rydin , Y. 2007 . Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory . Planning Theory , 6 : 52 – 68 .
  • Shachar , A. 1998 . Reshaping the map of Israel: A new national planning doctrine . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 555 : 209 – 218 .
  • Shefer , D. and Kaess , L. 1990 . Evaluation methods in urban and regional planning: Theory and practice . Town Planning Review , 61 : 75 – 88 .
  • Shmueli , D. 2005 . Is Israel ready for participatory planning? Expectations and obstacles . Planning Theory and Practice , 4 : 485 – 514 .
  • Soderbaum , P. 1998 . “ Economics and ecological sustainability: An actor–network approach to evaluation ” . In Evaluation in Planning , Edited by: Lichfield , N. , Barbanente , A. , Bori , D. and Prat , A. 51 – 72 . Dodrecht : Kluwer .
  • Torgerson , D. 2003 . Democracy through policy discourse . Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , : 113 – 138 .
  • Yacobi , H. 2007 . The NGOization of space: Dilemmas of social change, planning policy and the Israeli public sphere . Environment and Planning D , 25 : 745 – 758 .
  • Yewlett , C.J.L. 2001 . Theory and practice in OR and town planning: A continuing creative synergy? . Journal of the Operational Research Society , 52 : 1304 – 1314 .
  • Yiftachel , O. and Huxley , M. 2000 . Debating dominance and relevance: notes on the communicative turn in planning theory . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 24 : 907 – 913 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.