Knowledge-based land use and transport planning? Consistency and gap between “state-of-the-art” knowledge and knowledge claims in planning documents in three Scandinavian city regions

REFERENCES

• Andersen, J. (2013). The shaping of transport model based knowledge production: An embedded case study of Danish transport modelling practice in a contemporary and historical perspectivePh.D. thesis. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Architecture Week. (2008). New urbanism in Charlotte. Architecture Week. Retrieved from http://www.architectureweek.com/2008/0409/building_1-2.html. (Accessed 9 April, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengs, C. (2005). Planning theory for the naive?European Journal of Spatial Development. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD (Debate and Miscellaneous, July).
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism. A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. (First published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science – with a new introduction. London: Routledge. (First published 1975).
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M., & Crane, R. (2001). Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M., & Sarmiento, S. (1998). Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban Studies, 35, 1155–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruegmann, R. (2005). Sprawl: A compact history. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H., & Nielsen, P. (2005). Kritisk realisme. Frederiksberg: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, C., Atkins, S., & Goodwin, P. (2002). Disappearing traffic? The story so far. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers; Municipal Engineer, 151, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29, 359–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiani & Nielsen; Højgaard & Schultz A/S; Kampmann and Kierulff & Saxild A/S. (1936). Motorveje med Broer over Storebælt og Øresund. Copenhagen: Egmont H. Petersen.
   Google Scholar
• CNU. (2013). Canons of sustainable architecture and urbanism. A companion to the charter of new urbanism. Retrieved from http://www.cnu.org/sites/files/Canons.pdf. (Accessed 25 March, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Randall, & Chatman, DanielG. (2003). Traffic and sprawl: Evidence from U.S. commuting, 1985 to 1997. Planning and Markets, 6, (September), pp. 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2003). European briefing: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11, 979–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1962). The law of peak-hour expressway congestion, Traffic Quarterly, 16, 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Ø. (1996). Lokalisering, tilgjengelighet og arbeidsreiser. En analyse avarbeidsreiser i Osloregionens sørkorridor basert på kriteriene i ABC-systemet. (Location, accessibility and journeys to work. An analysis of commutes in the South corridor of the Oslo region based on the criteria of the ABC system). TØI Working Paper 1048/1996. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Ø. (2005). Location and daily mobility. Paper for the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association at Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 23–27 August 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Ø., Hanssen, J. U., & Strand, A. (2010). Handelslokalisering og transport. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2007). The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A commentary on ‘human geography without scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S., & Fainstein, N. (1996). City planning and political values: An updated view. In S.Campbell & S.Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 265–287). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: Problems, causes, cures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 578–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G., & Small, K. A. (1993). Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?Urban Studies, 30, 1485–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1989). Gasoline consumption and cities: A reply. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 342–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, D., Holz-Rau, C., & Maciolek, M. (2009). Employment suburbanization and commuter traffic in German city regions. Paper presented at the 9th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, September 9–11, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, J. U. (1993). Transportmessige virkning er av næringsvirksomheters lokalisering. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2001a). Boliglokalisering og transportadfærd. Hørsholm: Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2001b). Arbejdspladslokalisering og transportadfærd. Hørsholm: Forskningscenteret for skov og landskab.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992/1996). Planning through debate. The communicative turn in planning theory. In S.Campbell & S.Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 234–257). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Originally published in Town Planning Review, Vol. 63 (2), 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hoftun, S. (2002). The emergence of a sustainable urban form – a study of the different factors influencing what is considered the best strategy for urban sustainability in Norway. Oslo/Aalborg: University of Oslo/Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G. (1999). Sustainable mobility – the concept and its implications. Roskilde/Sogndal: Roskilde University and Western Norway Research Center. Ph.D. thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G., & Næss, P. (2008). Interdisciplinarity, ecology and scientific theory - the case of sustainable urban development. Journal of Critical Realism, 7, 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17, 349–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., & Richardson, T. (2004). Making European space: Mobility, power and territorial identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, J. R. (1990). Don't shoot me I'm only the transport planner (apologies to Elton John). In P. W. G.Newman, J. R.Kenworthy, & T.Lyons (Eds.), Transport energy conservation policies for australian cities: Strategies for reducing automobile dependence, attachment 16 (20 pages). Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, J. R. (2003). Transport energy use and greenhouse gases in urban passenger transport systems: A study of 84 global cities. Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, D. L. (1976). Energy and land use: An instrument of US conservation policy?Energy Policy, 4, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefévre, B. (2010). Urban transport energy consumption: Determinants and strategies for its reduction. An Analysis of the Literature, Sapiens, 2(3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. A. (2003). Recent developments in economic methodology: The rhetorical and ontological turns. Foundations of Science, 8, 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2011). Generated traffic and induced travel. Implications for transport planningVersion of June 8, 2011. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Martamo, R. (1995). Työssäkäyntietäisyydet Suomessa. Helsinki: Miljöministeriet, Markanvändingsavdelningen.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment (DK). (2007). Fingerplan 2007Landsplandirektiv for hovedstadsområdets planlægning. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Envionment.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment (NO). (1993). National policy provisions on coordinated land use and transport planning. Oslo: Ministry of the Envionment. T-5/93.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment (NO). (2011). National expectations to regional and municipal planning. Oslo: Ministry of the Envionment. T-1497.
   Google Scholar
• Mogridge, M. J. (1997). The self-defeating nature of urban road capacity policy. A review of theories, disputes and available evidence. Transport Policy, 4, 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, G. (1983). Bedriftsflytting - endring i arbeidsreise og energiforbruk. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• MOTOS. (2007). Transport modelling: Towards operational standards in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.motosproject.eu/?po_id = handbook (Accessed 12 June, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Aarhus. (2009). Hovedstruktur - Kommuneplan 2009. Aarhus: Municipality of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Aarhus/COWI. (2008). Miljøvuredering af Kommuneplanforslag. Aarhus: Municipality of Aarhus/COWI.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Helsingborg. (2007). Trafikplan för staden. Ny syn på trafiken i morgondagens Helsingborg. Helsingborg: Municipality of Helsingborg.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Helsingborg. (2010). ÖP 2010 – en strategisk översiktsplan för Helsingborgs utveckling. Helsingborg: Municipality of Helsingborg.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Trondheim. (2008a). Kommuneplanens samfunnsdel 2009–2020. Trondheim: Municipality of Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Trondheim. (2008b). Trondheim kommunes miljøpakke for transport - et forlik mellom 6 partier i Trondheim bystyre. Trondheim: Municipality of Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Trondheim. (2008c). Working paper of March 25, 2008 prepared by the chief officer for the climate committee. Trondheim: Municipality of Trondheim, the Urban Planning Office.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (1993). Transportation energy in Swedish towns and regions. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 10, 187–206.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2001). Urban planning and sustainable development. European Planning Studies, 9, 503–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2004). Prediction, regressions and critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 3, 133–164.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63, 167–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2006a). Urban structure matters: Residential location, car dependence and travel behaviour. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2007). The impacts of job and household decentralization on commuting distances and travel modes: Experiences from the Copenhagen region and other Nordic urban areas. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 149–168, Heft 2/3.2007.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2009). Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29, 293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2011). ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2012a). Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5, 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2012b). Kritisk realisme og byplanforskning. (Critical realism and urban planning research). FORMakademisk, 5, Art. 4, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Jensen, O. B. (2004). Urban structure matters, even in a small town. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Larsen, S. L., & Røe, P. G. (1994). Energibruk til transport i 22 nordiske byer (energy use for transport in 22 Nordic towns). Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research. NIBR report 1994:2.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Mogridge, M. J. H., & Sandberg, S. L. (2001). Wider roads, more cars. Natural Resources Forum, 25, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Møller, J. S. (2004). Travel speed and modal choice in Copenhagen: The competition between car, transit and bike. Paper presented at the XVIII Aesop Congress in Grenoble, France, July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Næss, T., & Strand, A. (2011a). Oslo's farewell to urban sprawl. European Planning Studies, 19, 113–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Røe, P. G., & Larsen, S. L. (1995). Travelling distances, modal split and transportation energy in thirty residential areas in Oslo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38, 349–370.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Saglie, I. L. (2000). Surviving between the trenches: Planning research, methodology and theory of science. European Planning Studies, 8, 729–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Saglie, I. L., Glowacki, W., & Dunin-woyseth, H. (1998). Environmental considerations in physical planning under different conditions: A comparison of a polish and a Norwegian municipality. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15, 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Sandberg, S. L. (1996). Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies, 33, 557–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Sandberg, S. L., & R⊘e, P. G. (1996). Energy use for transportation in 22 Nordic towns. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13, 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Strand, A., Næss, T., & Nicolaisen, M. (2011b). On their road to sustainability? The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in two Scandinavian capital regions. Town Planning Review, 82, 287–317.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. S. (1998). Does planning need the plan?Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 208–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Cities and automobile dependence. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, O. A., & Fosgerau, M. (2005). Overvurderes tidsbenefit af vejprojekter? Paper presented at the conference Traffic Days at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, August 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T. S. (2002). Boliglokalisering og transport i Aalborg. Aalborg: Aalborg University. Ph.D. dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., & Lem, L. L. (2002). A Review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport Environment, 7, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Public Roads Administration. (2008). E6 Jaktøyen-Tonstad. Konsekvensutredning. Oslo: Norwegian Road Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ECMT. (1994). Final report of the joint OECD/ECMT project group on urban travel and sustainable development. Paris: OECD/European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Ormondroyd, J. (2004). Critically analysing information sources. (Cornell University Library, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2002). Land and limits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palecek, M., & Risjord, M. (2013). Relativism and the ontological turn within anthropology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C. (1929/1998). The neighbourhood unit (pp. 25–44). London: Routledge/Thoemmes. (1929) Reprinted.
   Google Scholar
• Pratten, S. (Ed.). (forthcoming, 2014). Social ontology and modern economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43, 1921–1941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2008). Recapturing democracy: Neoliberalization and the struggle for alternative urban futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Røe, P. G. (2001). Storbymenneskets hverdagsreiser. Sammenhenger mellom bosted, livsstil og hverdagsreisepraksis i et senmoderne perspektiv. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Technology and Science. Dr. Polit. dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• SACTRA. (1994). Trunk roads and the generation of traffic. London: HMSO. Retrieved from www.roads.detr.gov.uk/roadnetwork.
   Google Scholar
• Saglie, I.-L., & Sandberg, S. L. (1997). Urban expansion in norway - development by plan?Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. E., & Campbell, E. M. (1956). Highway traffic estimation. Saugatuck, CT: Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, G., & Hjort, S. (1840). Jernbane imellem Kjøbenhavn og Roskilde (2nd ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. (2012). The ontological turn in contemporary philosophy – October 3 to 5. PUCRS, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.spep.org/conferences/the-ontological-turn-in-contemporary-philosophy-october-3-to-5-pucrs-brazil/.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Marshall, S. (2001). The relationships between urban form and travel patterns: An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 1, 113–141.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Slotegraaf, G. (2001). Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology Behaviour, 4, 151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Strømmen, K. (2001). Rett virksomhet på rett sted – om virksomheters transportskapende egenskaper. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Technology and Science. doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., & Ellis, C. (2002). Beyond relativism: Reclaiming the search for good city form. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A. (2003). Bidrar bruk av transportanalyser i byplanleggingen til vekst i biltrafikken? Paper presented at the conference on Traffic Days at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, August 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A. (2012). How and why planners make plans which, if implemented, cause growth in traffic volumes. Explanations related to the expert knowledge, the planners, and the plan-making processes. Aas: Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Ph.D. thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. M. (1977). Great cities and their traffic, London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Tillberg, K. (2001). Barnfamiljers dagliga fritidsresor i bilsamhället - ett tidspussel med geografiska og könsmässiga variationerGeografiska regionstudier nr. 43. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, T. (1995). City as landscape: A post post-modern view of design and planning. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Twitchett, J. C. (2013). Ignoring induced traffic – an empirical study of induced traffic. Aalborg: Aalborg University. Master's thesis.
   Google Scholar
• van Heur, B., Leydesdorff, L., & Wyatt, S. (2013). Turning to ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘ontology’. Social Studies of Science, 43, 341–362.
   Google Scholar
• Verroen, E. J., Jong, M. A., Korver, W., & Jansen, B. (1990). Mobility profiles of businesses and other bodiesRapport INRO-VVG 1990–03. Delft: Institute of Spatial Organisation TNO.
   Google Scholar
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form: Conclusions. In K.Williams, E.Burton, & M.Jenks (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form (pp. 347–355). London: Pion Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47, 1793–1817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar