Revisiting a programmatic planning approach: managing linkages between transport and land use planning

REFERENCES

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined. Environment Planning B: Planning Design, 31, 743–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14, 1487–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansoff, H. I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1, 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APM. (2007). APM introduction to programme management. n.p.APM Programme Management Specific Interest Group.
   Google Scholar
• Artto, K., Martinsuo, M., Gemünden, H. G., & Murtoaro, J. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balducci, A. (2011). Strategic planning as exploration. Town Planning Review, 82, 529–546.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwman, M. E., & Linden, G. (2004). Transport planning and policy. In GLinden & HVoogd (Eds.), Environmental and infrastructure planning. Groningen: Geo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Bromiley, P., & Yoon Soo Jung, Y. S. (1990). Influences of context and process on project planning success. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9, 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs and Edelenbos. (2012). Connective capacity of program management: Responding to fragmented project management. Public Administration Quarterly, 36, 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher, T., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2010). De Programma Aanpak Nader Bekeken: Het Nationaal Samenwerkingsprogramma Luchtkwaliteit [The programme approach reexamined: The national collaboration programme on air quality]. Groningen: University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher, T., Zuidema, C., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (forthcoming). Bridging gaps; governing conflicts between transport and environmental policies. Accepted for publication in Environment and Planning A.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Policy Programme. (2007). Samen werken, samen leven. The Hague: Ministry of AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Committee Kok [Committee on Strengthening the Randstad]. (2007). Advies commissie versterking randstad. n.p.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (1999). Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. Official Journal of the European Communities L163 29 June 1999. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Teisman, G. R. (2008). Public–private partnership: on the edge of project and process management. Insights from Dutch practice: The Sijtwende spatial development project. Environment Planning C: Government Policy, 26, 614–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, M. (2002). The futile dream of the perfect goal. In K.Sahlin-Anderson & A.Söderholm (Eds.), Beyond project management: New perspectives on the temporary-permanent dilemma. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P., & Sanderson, C. (2011). The impact of organizational crafting on planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 12, 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: Problems, causes, cures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 578–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, P. (2005). Project management: A strategic planning approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glasbergen, P., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2005). Interactive planning of infrastructure: The changing role of Dutch project management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23, 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. J. (1997). Alternative approaches to programme management. International Journal of Project Management, 15, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009). In search of the “strategic” in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory and Practice, 10, 439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Hertogh, M., & Westerveld, E. (2010). Playing with complexity; management and organisation of large infrastructure projects. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Hombergen, R. (Ed.). (2011). Keuzemenu Programmamanagement [Programme management: A menu of options]. Schiedam: Scriptum.
   Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R. (2011). The tyranny of small decisions. Unsustainable cities and local day-to-day transport planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 12, 511–524.
   Google Scholar
• Loch, C., & Kavadias, S. (2011). Implementing strategy through projects. In P. W. G.Morris, J.Pinto, & J.Söderlund (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on project management. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, M., Rassau, A., & Danson, J. (2004). Programme management: A critical review. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 663–674.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, W. (1996). Implementing strategic change through projects. International Journal of Project Management, 14, 325–329.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Holt-Jensen, A. (1997). Bergen and Seattle: A tale of strategic planning in two cities. European Planning Studies, 5, 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition; leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, P. W. G. (2009). Implementing strategy through project management: The importance of managing the front-end. In T.Williams, K.Samset, & K.Sunnevag (Eds.), Making essential choices with scant information: Front-end decision-making in major projects (2009). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S., Goussevskaia, A., Swan, J., Bresnen, M., & Obembe, A. (2008). Interdependencies in complex project ecologies: The case of biomedical innovation. Long Range Planning, 41, 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). Randstad Holland, Netherlands. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Government Commerce. (2007). Managing successful programmes. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S. (2008). Thinking and acting as a great programme manager. Bastingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S. (2011). What's in a name: Project or programme?International Journal of Project Management, 29, 232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., & Partington, D. (2006). Pitfalls in taking a project-based view of programmes. . Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., Partington, D., Hemingway, C., Mohdzain, Z., & Shah, M. (2007). The importance of context in programme management: An empirical review of programme practices. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Randstad Urgent. (2007). Hoe versterken we de internat ionale concurrentiepositie en verbeteren we de bereikbaarheid?[How do we enhance the international economic competitive position and improve the accessibility of the Randstad region?]The Hague: Ministry of V&W.
   Google Scholar
• Randstad Urgent. (2008). Randstad Urgent Werkt! [The Randstad urgency programme works!]. The Hague: Ministry of V&W.
   Google Scholar
• Randstad Urgent. (2010). Randstad Urgent Werkt! [The Randstad urgency programme works!]. The Hague: Ministry of V&W.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, K. (2009). An introduction to project management. Boston: Course Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., & Kopp, A. (2005). Transport infrastructure: Investment and planning. Policy and research aspects. Policy and research aspects, Transport Policy, 12, 360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S. (2009). Administrative short-termism—a non-issue in environmental and regional governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11, 165–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. (1979). Strategic planning; what every manager must know. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, J. M., Sgouridis, S. P., & Ward, J. L. (2005). New approach to transportation planning for the 21st century: Regional strategic transportation planning as a complex large-scale integrated open system. Transportation Research Record., 1931, 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R. (2008). Complexity and management of improvement programmes. Public Management Review, 10, 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiry, M. (2004). “For DAD”: A programme management life-cycle process. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• TNO. (2012). Randstad monitor [Monitor of the Randstad region]. Delft: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Tornberg, P. (2012). Committed to coordination? How different forms of commitment complicate the coordination of national and urban planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. (2008). Decisions as dynamic equilibriums in erratic policy processes. Public Management Review, 10, 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., Buijs, J. M., & Teisman, G. R. (2010). Program management and the creative art of coopetition: Dealing with potential tensions and synergies between spatial development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herk, S., Rijke, J., Zevenbergen, C., & Ashley, R. (2012). Governance of integrated flood risk management to deliver large scale investment programmes: Delivery focused social learning in the NetherlandsFloodrisk 2012- 2nd European Conference on flood risk management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vereecke, A., Pandelaere, E., Deschoolmeester, D., & Stevens, M. (2003). A classification of development programmes and its consequences for programme management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23, 1279–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VROM. (2006). Koppeling van ruimtelijke besluitvorming en luchtkwaliteit; Notitie ontkoppelingsvarianten. The Hague: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C. (2011). Strategic navigation: In search of an adaptable mode of strategic spatial planning practice. Town Planning Review, 82, 595–613.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., Waterhout, B., & Trip, J. J. (2009). Van projectologie naar planologie en vice versa [From ‘plan’-ning to ‘project’-ing and vice versa]. In G.Bouma, F.Filius, H.Leinfelder, & B.Waterhout (Eds.), Tussen droom en werkelijkheid [Between dream and reality]. Brussels: Plandag.
   Google Scholar