Greasing the wheels, or a spanner in the works? Permitting the adaptive re-use of redundant office buildings into residential use in England

References

• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Planners as market actors: rethinking state–market relations in land and property. Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 187–207.10.1080/14649351003759631
   Google Scholar
• Allen, K. (2014). Businesses evicted to make way for flats. Financial Times, Retrieved May 25, 2015. Published 8/10/14. 17:13.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2011). New labour and planning: From new right to new left. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Critical reflections on spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2544–2549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2005). The textures of property markets: Downtown housing and office conversions in New York City. Urban Studies, 42, 2431–2445.10.1080/00420980500380345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., & Williams, L. (2012). The temporary city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boles, N. (2013). It’s official: Government announces offices to residential permitted development right. Architects Journal, 24th January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (1996). Controlling development: Certainty and discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2003). Planning by consent: The origins and nature of british development control. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203402153
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2009). Managing land-use change. Land Use Policy, 26, S154–S159.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. R. (1997). Obsolescence and the process of creative reconstruction. Urban Studies, 34, 1439–1458.10.1080/0042098975501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkholder, S. (2012). The new ecology of vacancy: Rethinking land use in shrinking cities. Sustainability, 4, 1154–1172.10.3390/su4061154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvino, I. (1972). Invisible cities. Rome: GiulioEinaudiEditore.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2013). The collaborating planner: Planning in the neoliberal age. Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447305118.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. (2013). Office to resi will cause a north/south opportunity divide. The Planner, 23 April 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, J. (2013). Office politics. Planning Resource, 6 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, B., & Booth, P. (1992). Negotiation and delay in the development control process: Case studies in Yorkshire and Humberside. The Town Planning Review, 63, 63–78.10.3828/tpr.63.1.3ul5h0503w706953
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Henneberry, J. (2000). Understanding urban development processes: Integrating the economic and the social in property research. Urban Studies, 37, 2399–2416.10.1080/00420980020005398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haar, C. M. (1984). Cities, law and social policy: Learning from the British. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. H. (1932). Institutions. In E. R. A. Seligman & A. Johnson (Eds) Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 8 (pp. 84–89). London: MacMillan
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2, 101–131.10.1111/ijur.1978.2.issue-1-4
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, W. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11, 431–441.10.1177/1468794111404329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Regulating property development and the capacity of the development industry. Journal of Property Research, 15, 211–227.10.1080/095999198368374
   Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J., & Parris, S. (2013). The embedded developer: Using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks. Town Planning Review, 84, 227–250.10.3828/tpr.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E., Adams, D., & Hobma, F. (2015). Planners as market actors: The role of local planning authorities in the UK’s urban regeneration practice. Town Planning Review, 86, 625–650.10.3828/tpr.2015.37
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J., Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., & Popper, F. (2009) Planning shrinking cities Working Paper, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2010). Culture change as identity regulation: The micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England. Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 359–374.10.1080/14649357.2010.500133
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. J. (2012). Britain’s building stock – a carbon challenge. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, D. (2002). Adapting buildings for changing uses: Guidelines for change of use and refurbishment. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, M. (2015) The end of the office: Gehry designed Facebook HQ is a gargantuan, green-roofed gallery. Retrieved May 25, 2015 from Architizer.com/blog/frank-gehrys-facebook-headquarters. 18:35.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2012). Is planning “under attack”? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England, European Planning Studies, 22(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, A. (2013). Delivering local plans: Recognising the bounded interests of local planners. Environment & Planning C, 31, 1133–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclennan, D., & O'Sullivan, A. (2012). Housing markets, signals and search. Journal of Property Research, 29, 324–340.10.1080/09599916.2012.717102
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D., Greenhalgh, P., & Pugalis, L. (2015). Is the grass always greener? The Geographical Journal, 181, 26–37.10.1111/geoj.2015.181.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013) Urban catalyst: The power of temporary use. Berlin: DOM.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). A neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34, 380–404.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Remoy, H. (2010). Out of office. Amsterdam: University of Delft Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2014). Forget about greenfield sites, build in the city. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from //www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/15/greenfield-sites-cities-commuter-central-brownfield-sites. 18:55.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Court of Justice. (2013). Judicial judgement: London Borough of Islington and Richmond – upon –thames vs secretary of state for communities and local government. Royal Courts of Justice, 20th December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability, and job knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 8–9.10.1111/cdir.1993.2.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7, 344–357.10.1111/gec3.v7.5
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2012). Spatial planning and governance: Understanding UK planning. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neo-liberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34, 519–540.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, D. (2014). Estates Gazette editors comments. Estates Gazette, 11 January 2014.
   Google Scholar