The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice

References

• Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N., & Munjoma, T. (2002). Land policy and urban renaissance: The impact of ownership constraints in four British cities. Planning Theory & Practice, 3, 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (1998). Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1–37.10.1080/096922998347633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory?. City, 13, 198–207.10.1080/13604810902996466
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, L., Haag, H., Jud, B., Kissling, S., & Spori, N. (2011). Einführung in die Raumplanung [Introduction to Land Use Planning]. Bern: VLP-ASPAN.
   Google Scholar
• Cheever, F. (1996). Public good and private magic in the law of land trusts and conservation easements: A happy present and a troubled future. Denver University Law Review, 73, 1077–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. (2000). Mandatory happiness? land readjustment and property in Germany. In Y.-H. Hong, & B. Needham (Eds.), Analyzing land readjustment. Economics, law, and collective action (pp. 37–55). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben, P., & Higgins, P. (2004). New public management: Marketisation, managerialism and consumerism. In P. Dibben, G. Wood, & I. Roper (Eds.), Contesting public sector reforms. Critical perspectives, international debates (pp. 26–37). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B. (1999). L’État régulateur en Europe [The regulating State in Europe]. Revue française de science politique, 49, 205–230.10.3406/rfsp.1999.395365
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2008). Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 768–785.10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. (1999). Guide to California planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén, M. (2001). Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235–260.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Spit, T. (2015). Dilemmas of involvement in land management – Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42, 729–737.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Barrett, S. M. (1985). Land policy: Towards a research agenda. In S. M. Barrett, & P. Healey (Eds.), Land problems: Problems and alternatives (pp. 1–20). Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Hengstermann, A., & Gerber, J.-D. (2015). Aktive Bodenpolitik – Eine Auseinandersetzung vor dem Hintergrund der Revision des eidgenössischen Raumplanungsgesetzes [Active land policy – A discussion in the light of the revision of the Swiss Land Use Planning Law]. Flächenmanagement und Bodenordnung (FuB), 6, 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., Gennaio Franscini, M.-P., & Kübler, D. (2014). Actors, decisions and policy changes in local urbanization. European Planning Studies, 22, 1301–1319.10.1080/09654313.2013.783557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-17169-9
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration: An introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. M., & Paulsen, K. (2009). Property rights: The neglected theme of 20th-century American planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75, 134–143.10.1080/01944360802619721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, V., & Faith Strelec, J. (2011). Re-thinking the city. Urban dynamics and motility. Lausanne: EPFL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P., Csikos, M., Gerber, J.-D., & Nahrath, S. (2012). Transformation der Rolle des Staates und der Grundeigentümer in städtischen Raumentwicklungsprozessen im Lichte der nachhaltigen Entwicklung [Transformation of the role of the State and landowners in land-use planning processes from a sustainability perspective]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 3, 414–443.
   Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P., Finger, M., & Haldemann, T. (1995). New public management. Swiss Political Science Review, 1(1), i–xv.
   Google Scholar
• Krabben, E. van der, & Jacobs, H. (2013). Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy, 30, 774–783.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Environment and planning D: Society and space, 21, 509–512.10.1068/d2105ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2005). Introduction: L’action publique saisie par ses instruments [Introduction: Understanding public policy through instruments]. In P. Lascoumes, & P. Le Galès (Eds.), Gouverner par les instruments (pp. 11–44). Paris: Presses de Science Po.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, C. K. (2002). Direct government. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government a guide to the new governance (pp. 48–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, W. (1994). Swiss democracy: Possible solutions to conflict in multicultural societies. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Saglie, I.-L., & Cars, G. (2011). Between input legitimacy and output efficiency: Defensive routines and agonistic reflectivity in nordic land-use planning. European Planning Studies, 19, 2109–2126.10.1080/09654313.2011.632906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthey, L. (2015). Malaise dans la profession. Les urbanistes suisses face aux transformations de leur métier [Swiss urban planners and the transformations of their profession]. Metropolitiques, 14 January 2015. Retrived from http://www.metropolitiques.eu/Malaise-dans-la-profession.html
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. W. (2008). Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum, 39, 1215–1227.10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggli, R. (n.d.). Spatial planning in Switzerland: A short introduction. Bern: VLP-ASPAN. Retrieved from http://www.vlp-aspan.ch/sites/default/files/at_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nahrath, S. (2005). Le rôle de la propriété foncière dans la genèse et la mise en œuvre de la politique d’aménagement du territoire [The role of ownership in the origin and implementation of the land-use planning policy]. In A. Da Cunha, P. Knoepfel, J.-P. Leresche, & S. Nahrath (Eds.), Enjeux du développement urbain durable transformations urbaines, gestion des ressources et gouvernance (pp. 299–328). Lausanne: PPUR.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B., & Verhage, R. (1998). The effects of land policy: Quantity as well as quality is important. Urban Studies, 35, 25–44.10.1080/0042098985050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance. The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 372–396.10.1177/10780879922183988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritz, A. (2005). 10 Jahre Verwaltungsreform in den Schweizer Kantonen. Eine Bilanz aus der Sicht von Legislative und Exekutive [10 years of administrative reform in Swiss Cantons: an appraisal from the perspective of the legislative and executive]. In A. Lienhard, A. Ritz, R. Steiner, & A. Ladner (Eds.). 10 Jahre New Public Management in der Schweiz: Bilanz, Irrtümer und Erfolgsfaktoren. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, J. (2008). Aménagement du territoire et question foncière: quelques points de repère [Land-use planning and the land question: some reference points]. Urbia, 6, 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T., & Sørensen, C. H. (2011). Planning analysis and political steering with new public management. European Planning Studies, 19, 217–241.10.1080/09654313.2011.532666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government a guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, K. (2003). Local and regional public management reforms in Switzerland. Public Administration, 81, 325–344.10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B., & Elgendy, H. (2011). Siedlungsflächenreserven in der Schweiz. Anforderungen an eine schweizweite Übersicht [Building land reserves in Switzerland. Requirements for a Swiss-wide survey]. Geomatik Schweiz, 8, 380–383.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, M., Dessemontet, P., & Joye, D. (2005). Les niveaux géographiques de la Suisse [The geographical levels of Switzerland]. Bern: OFS.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, M., & Ruzicka-Rossier, M. (2011). Une décennie de politique d’agglomération [A decade of agglomeration policy]. Tracés, 05, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, H. (1970). Bodenpolitik und Bodenrecht [Land policy and land law]. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, O., Klauser, F., Piguet, E., & Crot, L. (2012). Dynamics of globalisation: Mobility. Space and Regulation. Geographica Helvetica, 67, 43–54.10.5194/gh-67-43-2012
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., & Ladner, A. (2006). Die Schweizer Gemeinden im Fokus – Ergebnisse der Gemeindebefragung 2005 [The Swiss municipalities in focus – Result of the municipal survey 2005]. In A. Glatthard, & U. Isch (Eds.), Perspektiven für Gemeindefinanzen (pp. 8–34). Bern: ESG.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1995). Regime theory and urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 54–71). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Süess, A., & Gmünder, M. (2005). Weniger Zersiedlung durch handelbare Flächennutzungszertifikate? [Less urban sprawl thanks to transferable development rights?] DISP, 160, 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D., & Steinmo, S. (2002). The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34, 542–577.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theurillat, T., & Crevoisier, O. (2013). The sustainability of a financialized urban megaproject: The case of Sihl city in Zurich. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 2052–2073.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theurillat, T., & Crevoisier, O. (2014). Sustainability and the anchoring of capital: Negotiations surrounding two major urban projects in Switzerland. Regional Studies, 48, 501–515.10.1080/00343404.2013.787160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillemans, L., Weber, P., Ruegg, J., & Prélaz-Droux, R. (2012). Maîtriser le foncier pour maîtriser la production urbaine [Controlling property rights to control urban development]. Working paper COST TU602 Land management for urban dynamics. UNIL / IHEIG.
   Google Scholar
• VLP-ASPAN. (2013). Rechtliche Möglichkeiten zur Baulandmobilisierung in den Kantonen und Gemeinden [Legal possibilities for the mobilization of building land in cantons and municipalities]. Raum & Umwelt, September 5, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. An outline of interpretive sociology. New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, P., Prélaz-Droux, R., Ruegg, J., & Tillemans, L. (2011). How to supply enough land at the right place and time? An answer given by the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. In M. Tira, E. Van der Krabben, & B. Zanon (Eds.), Land management for urban dynamics: innovative methods and practices in a changing Europe (pp. 381–399). Maggioli: Santarcangelo di Romagna.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40, 1183–1206.10.1080/0042098032000084550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. B., & Czerniak, R. J. (2000). The rising importance of voluntary methods of land use control in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 419–423.10.1177/0739456X0001900411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli, U. (1990). Zum Stand der Bodenpolitik und des Bodenrechts [Progress in land policy and land law]. In: B. Knapp (Ed.) Perspektiven des Raumplanungs- und des Bodenrechts (pp. 161–189). Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
   Google Scholar