Love Among the Ruins: Nonviolent Anarchism and the Housing Question

References

• Allen, C. (2008). Housing market renewal and social class. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C., & Imrie, R. (Eds.). (2010). The knowledge business: Commodification of housing and urban research. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C., & Marne, P. (2010). ‘In the name of the People?’ The state, social science and the ‘public interest’ in urban regeneration. In C. Allen & R. Imrie (Eds.), The knowledge business (pp. 57–76). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, J. (2006). Faith and politics after christendom: The church as a movement for anarchy. Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1966). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookchin, M. (1982). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascallian meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. (2008). Demand the possible: Journey’s in changing our word as a public activist-scholar. Antipode, 40, 421–427.10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. (2010). Geographical knowledges and neoliberal tensions: Compulsory land purchase in the context of contemporary urban redevelopment. Environment and Planning A, 42, 856–873.10.1068/a42209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christyanopolous, A. (2011). Christian anarchism: A political commentary on the gospel. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cudenec, P. (2013). The anarchist revelation: Being what we’re meant to be. Brighton: Winter Oak Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cudenec, P. (2014). The stifled soul of humankind. Brighton: Winter Oak Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, J. (2011). War and the Christian conscience. New York, NY: Orbis.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S., Gordon, I., & Harloe, M. (Eds.). (1992). Divided cities: New York and London in the contemporary world. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Burrows, R. (2001). Home ownership in a risk society: A social analysis of mortgage arrears and possessions. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality volume 1: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. (2015). Faith, power and peace. London: Quaker Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, D. (2011). Holding faith: Creating peace in a violent world. London: Quaker Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gorz, A. (1999). Reclaiming work: Beyond the wage based society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, C. (1999). Pride and prejudice: Discourses of normalisation in public and private accounts of home ownership. Housing Studies, 14, 163–183.10.1080/02673039982902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamnett, C. (2010). ‘I am critical. You are mainstream’: A response to Slater. City, 14, 180–186.10.1080/13604810903579287
   Google Scholar
• Harloe, M. (Ed.). (1977). Captive cities. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harloe, M. (Ed.). (1981). City, class and capital. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1999). Slipping through the cracks: The origins of aided self-help housing, 1918–53. Housing Studies, 14, 281–309.10.1080/02673039982803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebden, A. (2014). Tent city urbanism: From self-organised camps to tiny House villages. Eugene, OR: The Village Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Hiranandani, V. S. (2014). A Gandhian approach to peace movements in the 21st century. Peace Studies Journal, 7, 78–92.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. (2014). The revolutionary urbanism of street farm: Eco-anarchism, architecture and alternative technology in the 1970s. Bristol: Tangent Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1981). The Myth of Home ownership: Pubic versus private choices in housing tenure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1988). Defining housing reality: Ideological hegemony and power in housing research. Housing Studies, 3, 205–218.10.1080/02673038808720631
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1992). Housing and social theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1995). From public housing to the social market: Rental policy strategies in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203308554
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (2002). Society versus the state: The social construction of explanatory narratives in social policy research. Housing, Theory and Society, 19, 185–195.10.1080/140360902321122888
   Google Scholar
• Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, P. (2005). Housing and the welfare state. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, P. (1993). Demanding the impossible: A history of anarchism. London: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, K., & Cooper, V. (2016). It’s the state, stupid: 21st century gentrification and state led evictions. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. (2010). Still missing Marcuse: Hamnett’s foggy analysis in London town. City, 14, 170–179.10.1080/13604811003633719
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vinthagen, S. (2015). A theory of nonviolent action: How civil resistance works. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, C. (1976). Housing: An anarchist approach. London: Freedom Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, M., & Zwick, L. (2005). The catholic worker movement: Intellectual and spiritual origins. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar