Planning for Waterway Renewal: Balancing Institutional Reproduction and Institutional Change

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2001). A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning. The Town Planning Review, 72(1), 45–75.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, J., Filarski, R., Jeekel, H., & Toussaint, B. (Ed.). (2016). Builders and planners: A history of land-use and infrastructure planning in the Netherlands. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., Anderton, K., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M., & Schwanen, T. (2011). Transportation and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 247–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2007). Evolutionary urban transportation planning: An exploration. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1998–2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, R., & Foxon, T. J. (2015). Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process—Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(B), 538–550.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 891–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for the Environment and Infrastructure. (2018). Better and different mobility: Investing in mobility for the future. The Hague: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Deltaprogramma. (2012). Vervangingsopgave natte kunstwerken. The Hague: Delta programme, Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154(4), 696–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIB. (2016). Opgaven en middelen voor infrastructuur tot 2030. Amsterdam: Economisch Instituut voor de Bouw.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M., & Brown, R. (2011). Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 721–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1997). Narration, reason and community. In L. P. Hinchman & S. K. Hinchman (Eds.), Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences (pp. 307–327). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, N., & Beckman, S. (2009). Introduction: Infrastructure meets business: Building new bridges, mending old ones. California Management Review, 51(2), 6–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, S., & Healey, P. (2005). A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2055–2069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., Van den Brink, M., Jong, P., … Bergsma, E. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning. In N. Verma (Ed.), Institutions and planning (pp. 61–87). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hijdra, A., Arts, J., & Woltjer, J. (2014). Do we need to rethink our waterways? Values of ageing waterways in current and future society. Water Resources Management, 28(9), 2599–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I&M. (2016). Integraal duurzaam opdrachtgeverschap vervanging en renovatie. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure & the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• I&M. (2017). Rijksbegroting 2017 A Infrastructuurfonds. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure & the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. (2011). Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: Adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environment, 16(4), 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (2015). Move: Putting America’s infrastructure back in the lead. New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. M. (2011). Unimaginable change: Future directions in planning practice and research about institutional reform. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 328–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintsen, H. (2002). Two centuries of central water management in the Netherlands. Technology & Culture, 43(3), 549–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Ed.). (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, T. (2013). Institutional perspectives on operationalising climate adaptation through planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(2), 198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. С. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Water governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the future? (OECD Water Series). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat. (2015). MultiWaterWerk: Slimme standaardisatie bij nieuwe sluizen. Rijkswaterstaat, 1(1). Retrieved October 15, 2018, from https://www.magazinesrijkswaterstaat.nl/zakelijkeninnovatie/2015/01/mww
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. G. M. (2018). Institutions in action. In W. G. M. Salet (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of institutions and planning in action (pp. 3–23). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2010). Land, property rights, and planning in Japan: Institutional design and institutional change in land management. Planning Perspectives, 25(3), 279–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2015). Taking path dependence seriously: An historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. (2016). Bruto binnenlands product: Nederland en de wereld. The Hague: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M. A. (2009). Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vlist, M., Roovers, G., & Barneveld, A. (2016). Vervangingsopgave natte kunstwerken in het hoofdvaarwegensysteem en hoofdvaarwegennet in Nederland. Water Governance, 2, 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dorsser, J. C. M. (2015). Very long term development of the Dutch inland waterway transport system: Policy analysis, transport projections, shipping scenarios, and a new perspective on economic growth and future discounting. Doctoral dissertation TRAIL Research School. Delft: University of Technology Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy “frames” to “framing”: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, N. (Ed.). (2007). Institutions and planning. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J. J., Busscher, T., Hijdra, A., & Arts, J. (2016). Renewing infrastructure networks: New challenge, new approach? Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2497–2506.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: How it works; where it is headed. De Economist, 146(1), 23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1087–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar