Co-Production as a Driver of Urban Governance Transformation? The Case of the Oplan LIKAS Programme in Metro Manila, Philippines

References

• Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Development, 32(3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, J. (2012). From co-production to co-governance. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector, and co-production (pp. 119–144). New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akaateba, M. A., Huang, H., & Adumpo, E. A. (2018). Between co-production and institutional hybridity in land delivery: Insights from local planning practice in peri-urban Tamale, Ghana. Land Use Policy, 72, 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2013). Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory, 12(1), 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, D. (2012). Finance as the key to unlocking community potential: Savings, funds and the ACCA programme. Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros, M. M. (2002). Rethinking institutional reforms in the Philippine housing sector. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2002-16. Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS).
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros, M. M., & Egana, J. V. (2013). Efficiency and effectiveness review of the National Housing Authority (NHA) resettlement program. PIDS DiscussionPaper Series No. 2013–28. Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros, M. M., Ramos, T. P., & Magtibay, J. E. (2017). An assessment of the community mortgage program implementation strategy. Research Paper Series 2017-01. Quezon City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development, 66, 707–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaqua, K. (2017, May 13). A people’s plan to house the poor. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://opinion.inquirer.net/
   Google Scholar
• Boonyabancha, S., & Kerr, T. (2018). Lessons from CODI on co-production. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 444–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, B. H. (2015a). City learning from below: Urban poor federations and knowledge generation through transnational, horizontal exchange. International Development Planning Review, 37(2), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, B. H. (2015b). Quiet conflict: Institutional change, informal settlement upgrading, and formalized partnerships between local authorities and urban social movements in South Africa. In P. Herrle, A. Ley, & J. Fokdal (Eds.), From local action to global networks: Housing the urban poor (pp. 101–120). London: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Luthango, M., & Reyes, E. (2018). Urban upgrading to reduce violence in informal settlements. In G. Bhan, S. Srnivas, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to planning in the Global South (pp. 298–309). New York: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chitekwe-Biti, B. (2018). Co-producing Windhoek: The contribution of the Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, N. (2016). Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks. Urban Studies, 53(3), 577–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino-David, K. (2004). Unsustainable development: The Philippine experience. In D. Westendorff (Ed.), From unsustainable to inclusive cities (pp. 96–107). Geneva: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2004). Introduction: New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation. IDS Bulletin, 35(2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikeç, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DILG (Department of Interior and Local Government). (2017). Accomplishment report January – December 2017. Quezon City: Unpublished Manuscript, DILG.
   Google Scholar
• DILG (Department of Interior and Local Government). (2018). Resettlement governance. Power point presentation. Quezon City: Unpublished Manuscript, DILG.
   Google Scholar
• Environment & Urbanization. (2018). 30(2), 355–633.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuszka, J. (2014). Community-based approaches to settlement upgrading as manifested through the big ACCA projects in Metro Manila, Philippines. Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 276–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuszka, J. (2017). Evidence-based planning and housing approaches bias: Methodological alternatives for broadening policy options in mass housing programs. In Urban perspectives: Climate change, migration, planning – A new generation of ideas 2017 (pp. 64–85). Washington, DC: Urban Sustainability Laboratory, Wilson Center.
   Google Scholar
• Galuszka, J. (2019). What makes urban governance co-productive? Contradictions in the current debate on co-production. Planning Theory, 18(1), 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, M. (2013). The ideology of the dual city: The modernist ethic in the corporate development of Makati City, Metro Manila. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, M. (2017). Why the poor support populism: The politics of sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology, 123(3), 647–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerald, N. (2011, December 6). The price of informed advocacy: UP−ALL’s experience in negotiating housing solutions. Retrieved from https://www.philssa.org.ph/
   Google Scholar
• Habito, C. F. (2009). Patterns of inclusive growth in developing Asia: Insights from an enhanced growth-poverty elasticity analysis. ADBI Working Paper 145. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Herrle, P., Ley, A., & Fokdal, J. (Eds.). (2015). From local action to global networks: Housing the urban poor. London: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermayer, M. (Forthcoming). Informal settlement representation through Slum/Shack Dwellers International (SDI). In A. Mayne (Ed.), Oxford university press handbook of modern history of slums. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M. (2003). A legacy of control? The capital subsidy for housing, and informal settlement intervention in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 591–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUDCC (Housing and Urban Development Coordination Council). (2010, August 16). VP binay to NHA: Review resettlement policies. Retrieved from http://www.hudcc.gov.ph/pr081610
   Google Scholar
• HUDCC (Housing and Urban Development Coordination Council). (2017). Balai Filipino: Housing beyond 2022. Makati City: Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, J. (2007). The ‘disallowed’ political participation of Manila’s urban poor. Democratization, 14(5), 853–872.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, J., Hout, W., Hughes, C., & Robison, R. (2014). Political economy and the aid industry in Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaos, A. M. (2006). Populist mobilization and Manila’s urban poor: The case of SANAPA in the NGC East side. In A. Fabros, J. Rocamora, & D. Velasco (Eds.), Social movements: Experiences from the Philippines (pp. 46–102). Quezon City: Institute for Popular Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Karaos, A. M., & Porio, E. (2015). Transforming the housing process in the Philippines: The role of local–Global networks by the urban poor. In P. Herrle, A. Ley, & J. Fokdal (Eds.), From local action to global networks: Housing the urban poor (pp. 107–121). London: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kleibert, J. M. (2018). Exclusive development (s): Special economic zones and enclave urbanism in the Philippines. Critical Sociology, 44(3), 471–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C. (2017). Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: Participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa. International Development Planning Review, 39(1), 15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabilin, M. (2014). Forced-evictions, off-city relocation and resistance: Ramifications of neo-liberal polices towards the Philippines urban poor. In H. Moksens & M. Melin (Eds.), Claiming the civil society mobilisation by the urban poor (pp. 133–138). Uppsala: Uppsala Centre for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2012a). The entrepreneurial slum: Civil society, mobility and the co-production of urban development. Urban Studies, 49(13), 2795–2816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2012b). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2004). Neoliberalism and casualization of public sector services: The case of waste collection services in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 874–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2004). The role of local and extra-local organizations. In D. Mitlin & D. Satterthwaite (Eds.), Empowering squatter citizen: Local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction (pp. 278–306). London/Sterling,VA: Erthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state—Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2018). Beyond contention: Urban social movements and their multiple approaches to secure transformation. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 557–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D., & Bartlett, S. (2018). Co-production–Key ideas. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretto, L., Faldi, G., Ranzato, M., Rosati, F. N., Ilito Boozi, J. P., & Teller, J. (2018). Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 425–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papeleras, R., Bagotlo, O., & Boonyabancha, S. (2012). A conversation about change-making by communities: Some experiences from ACCA. Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), 463–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, K. (2013). A successful slum upgrade in Durban: A case of formal change and informal continuity. Habitat International, 40, 211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., Baptist, C., & d’Cruz, C. (2012). Knowledge is power–Informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patiño, P. I. (2016). Building resilient and safe communities against poverty and disaster. Asian Cities Climate Resilience (Working Paper Series 29). International Institute for Environment and Development. Retrieved from https://pubs.iied.org/10771IIED/
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, E. (2008). City futures: Confronting the crisis of urban development. London, New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Porio, E. (2012). Decentralisation, power and networked governance practices in Metro Manila. Space and Polity, 16(1), 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., Durose, C., & Perry, B. (2018). Coproducing urban governance. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 145–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigon, A. (2014). Building local governance: Participation and elite capture in slum‐upgrading in Kenya. Development and Change, 45(2), 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009a). Civic governmentality: The politics of inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode, 41(1), 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009b). The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43.6, 819–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento, H., & Tilly, C. (2018). Governance lessons from urban informality. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 199–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatkin, G. (2002). Working with the community: Dilemmas in radical planning in Metro Manila, the Philippines. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(3), 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Shatkin, G. (2007). Collective action and urban poverty alleviation: Community organizations and the struggle for shelter in Manila. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UDHA. (1992, March 24). Republic act no. 7279 “Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992”. Retrieved from http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno7279.htm#.WogDL2MvggI
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2011). Changing planning law in Africa: An introduction to the issue. Urban Forum, 22(3), 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2014). Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). Republic of the Philippines housing and urban development summit. In Closing the gap in affordable housing in the Philippines: Policy paper for the national summit on housing and urban development (pp. 1–170). Manila.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2017, September 1). Project appraisal document on a proposed loan in the Amount of US$207,60 million to the Republic of Philippines for a Metro Manila Flood Management Project. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/192891506823261036/pdf/PHILIPPINES-PAD-09082017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. (2015). Co-productive governance: A relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change, 30, 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 395–406.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (2006). Essay: Re-engaging planning theory? Towards ‘South-Eastern’ perspectives. Planning Theory, 5(3), 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Karaos, A. M. (2004). Establishing the role of communities in governance: The experience of the Homeless People’s Federation Philippines. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar