194
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Built on Solid Foundations? Assessing the Links between City-Scale Land Titling, Tenure Security and Housing Investment

Pages 358-375 | Received 08 Sep 2018, Accepted 06 Jun 2019, Published online: 03 Jul 2019

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
  • Ali, D., Deininger, K., & Duponchel, M. (2016). Sustaining the success of the systematic land tenure registration in Rwanda. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.
  • Biddulph, R., & Williams, S. (2016). Land titling and property in post-conflict Cambodia. In K. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp. 169–178). London: Routledge.
  • Bromley, R. (2004). Power, property and poverty: Why De Soto’s “mystery of capital” cannot be solved. In A. Roy & R. Alsayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia (pp. 271–288). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Catalla, P. (2000). Bins of gold: Livelihoods of young people in the Tonle Bassac squatter area, Phnom Penh. Phnom Penh: SCVCS.
  • CDRI. (2007). Land titling urban baseline study. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute.
  • Chandler, D. (1996). A history of Cambodia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Collins, E. (2016). Postsocialist informality: The making of owners, squatters and state rule in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1989–1993). Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(12), 2367–2382.
  • De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Deininger, K. W. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en‎&id=−3HWZigoZDMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=deininger+2003&ots=3Pq1g1YFn8&sig=eIXq4ZUgmgESSAxzRXpAIwCPyAs
  • Doebele, W. A. (1987). The evolution of concepts of urban land tenure in developing countries. Habitat International, 11(1), 7–22.
  • Durand-Lasserve, A. (2007). Market–Driven eviction processes in developing country cities: The cases of Kigali in Rwanda and Phnom Penh in Cambodia. Global Urban Development, 3(1), 1–14.
  • Durand-Lasserve, A., Fernandes, E., Payne, G., & Rakodi, C. (2007). Social and economic impacts of land titling programmes in urban and peri-urban areas: A review of the literature. Retrieved from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/government-society/idd/research/social-economic-impacts/social-economic-impacts-literature-review.pdf
  • Dwyer, M. B. (2015). The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(5), 903–928.
  • Feder, G., & Nishio, A. (1998). The benefits of land registration and titling: Economic and social perspectives. Land Use Policy, 15(1), 25–43.
  • Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Field, E. (2005). Property rights and investment in urban slums. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 279–290.
  • Flower, B. C. R. (2018a). Does informal tenure result in land inequality? A critique of tenure formalisation reforms in Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 77, 240–248.
  • Flower, B. C. R. (2018b). Legal geographies of neoliberalism: Market-oriented tenure reforms and the construction of an ‘informal’ urban class in post-socialist Phnom Penh. Urban Studies. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018794640 004209801879464
  • Galiani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2010). Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9), 700–729.
  • Gilbert, A. (2002). On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: What difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 1–19.
  • Gilbert, A. (2012). De Soto’s the mystery of capital: Reflections on the book’s public impact. International Development Planning Review, 34(3), v–xviii.
  • Gottesman, E. (2004). Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge: Inside the politics of nation building. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Grimsditch, M., & Henderson, N. (2009). Untitled: Tenure insecurity and inequality in the Cambodian land sector. Phnom Penh: COHRE/BABSEA.
  • Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2011). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
  • Hirsch, P. (2011). Titling against grabbing? Critiques and conundrums around land formalisation in Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the ‘Global Land Grabbing’ Conference, 6–8 April 2011, Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.
  • Jones, G. A., & Ward, P. M. (1994). The World Bank’s ‘new’urban management programme: Paradigm shift or policy continuity? Habitat International, 18(3), 33–51.
  • Khemro, B. H. S., & Payne, G. (2004). Improving tenure security for the urban poor in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: An analytical case study. Habitat International, 28(2), 181–201.
  • Lankatilleke, L. (2018). People’s process: A brief history of realising better housing through the potential for ingenuity. In R. Miranda, J. Royo-Olid, S. Fennell, R. Skinner, L. Davis, & T. Kalugalagedera (Eds.), Building, owning and belonging: From assisting owner-driven housing reconstruction to co-production in Sri Lanka, India and beyond (pp. 13–24). Colombo: EU/UN-Habitat.
  • Lawry, S., Samii, C., Hall, R., Leopold, A., Hornby, D., & Mtero, F. (2017). The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: A systematic review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(1), 61–81.
  • Ledgerwood, J. (2008). Ritual in 1990 Cambodian political theatre: New songs at the edge of the forest. In A. R. Hansen & J. Ledgerwood (Eds.), At the edge of the forest: Essays on Cambodia, history, and narrative in honor of David Chandler (pp. 195–220). Ithaca, NY: University of Cornell Press.
  • McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.
  • Menzies, N., Ketya, S., & Adler, D. (2008). Land, development and conflict: Urban & peri-urban Phnom Penh. Phnom Penh: CAS.
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 443–462.
  • Porter, L., Lombard, M., Huxley, M., Ingin, A. K., Islam, T., Briggs, J., … Watson, V. (2011). Informality, the commons and the paradoxes for planning: Concepts and debates for informality and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1), 115–153.
  • Rattanabirabongse, V., Eddington, R. A., Burns, A. F., & Nettle, K. G. (1998). The Thailand land titling project—Thirteen years of experience. Land Use Policy, 15(1), 3–23.
  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over integration and geography in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165.
  • Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.
  • Shatkin, G. (1998). ‘Fourth World’ cities in the global economy: The case of Phnom Penh, Cambodia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(3), 378–393.
  • Sovannarith, S., Sopheap, S., Utey, U., Rathmony, S., Ballard, B., & Acharya, S. (2001). Social assessment of land in Cambodia: A field Study. Phnom Penh: CDRI.
  • Springer, S. (2013). Violent accumulation: A postanarchist critique of property, dispossession, and the state of exception in neoliberalizing Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(3), 608–626.
  • STT. (2009). The 8 Khan survey. Phnom Penh: Sahakum Teang Tnaut.
  • STT. (2014). Phnom Penh’s history of displacement—Evicted communities from 1990 to 2014. Phnom Penh: Sahakum Teang Tnaut.
  • Talocci, G., & Boano, C. (2015). The politics of urban displacement practices in Phnom Penh: Reflections from Borei Santepheap Pi and Oudong Moi. Pacific Geographies, 43, 15–20.
  • Talocci, G., & Boano, C. (2018). The de-politicisation of housing policies: The case of Borei Keila land-sharing in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(2), 290–311.
  • Turner, J. F. (1977). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Urban Sector Group. (1994). Report on the survey of Phnom Penh squatter settlements, 1994. Phnom Penh: USG.
  • Van Gelder, J.-L. (2013). Then I’ll Huff, and I’ll Puff, and I’ll … : A natural experiment on property titling, housing improvement and the psychology of tenure security. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 734–749.
  • Van Gelder, J.-L., & Luciano, E. C. (2015). Tenure security as a predictor of housing investment in low-income settlements: Testing a tripartite model. Environment and Planning A, 47(2), 485–500.
  • Varley, A. (1987). The relationship between tenure legalization and housing improvements: Evidence from Mexico City. Development and Change, 18(3), 463–481.
  • Varley, A. (2002). Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 449–461.
  • Varley, A. (2013). Postcolonialising informality? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 4–22.
  • Varley, A. (2017). Property titles and the urban poor: From informality to displacement? Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 385–404.
  • Whitney, E. M., Cameron, D. B., & Winters, P. C. (2019). Heterogeneous effects of urban land titling: A replication of ‘Property rights for the poor. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(5), 1020–1033.
  • World Bank. (2002). Project appraisal document for land management and administration project. Washington D.C.: Author.
  • Yiftachel, O. (2009). Critical theory and ‘gray space’: Mobilization of the colonized. City, 13(2–3), 246–263.
  • Zevenbergen, J., Augustinus, C., Antonio, D., & Bennett, R. (2013). Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. Land Use Policy, 31, 595–604.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.