The Potentials and Pitfalls of ‘Art in Research’ Methodologies: Foregrounding Memory and Emotion in Planning Research

References

• Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 26, 7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, A. J. (2018). The micropolitics of performance: Pop-up art as a complementary method for civic engagement and public participation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18779428
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, C., & Castro-Salazar, R. (2017). Critical arts–based research: A performance of provocation. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9–10), 944–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, T. (2006). Arts-based educational research then, now and later. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (1997). Arts-based educational research. Contemporary Methods for Research in Education, 2, 75–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. K., Towne, S. A., Jordan, C. P., Lelliott, K. L., Johnson, M. S., Wilson, B., … Roberts, A. R. (2018). Race and spatial imaginary. Planning Theory and Practice, 19(2), 254–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, H. (2015). Planning with half a mind: Why planners resist emotion. Planning Theory and Practice, 16(4), 498–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydell, K. M., Hodgins, M., Gladstone, B. M., Stasiulis, E., Belliveau, G., Cheu, H., … Parsons, J. (2016). Arts-based health research and academic legitimacy: Transcending hegemonic conventions. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 681–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbart, M. M. (1995). Banners for the street: Reclaiming space and designing change with urban youth. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(1), 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds). (2017). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, S., & Coaffee, J. (2005). Art, gentrification and regeneraton - From artist as pioneer to public arts. European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(1), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Carp, J. (2004). Wit, style, and substance. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 242–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census Viewer. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://censusviewer.com/city/VA/Reston
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, K., & Jackson, S. (2010). Commentary: Arts, neighborhoods, and social practices: Towards an integrated epistemology of community arts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(4), 478–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B., Pothukuchi, K., & Finn, J. (1995). Youth participation in community planning: What are the benefits? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coemans, S., & Hannes, K. (2017). Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations. Educational Research Review, 22, 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coemans, S., Wang, Q., Leysen, J., & Hannes, K. (2015). The use of arts-based methods in community-based research with vulnerable populations: Protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunniffe, E. (2016). City government the latest to embrace artists-in-residence. Retrieved from https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2016/02/22/city-government-the-latest-to-embrace-artists-in-residence/
   Google Scholar
• Dang, S. R. (2005). A starter menu for planner/artist collaborations. Planning Theory and Practice, 6(1), 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J., & Milligan, C. (2004). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degarrod, L. N. (2013). Making the unfamiliar personal: Arts-based ethnographies as public-engaged ethnographies. Qualitative Research, 13(4), 402–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, B. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical race-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dubrow, G., & Sies, M. C. (2002). Letting our guard down: Race, class, gender, and sexuality in planning history. Journal of Planning History, 1(3), 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2018). Does arts-based research have a future? Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, S. (2012). Arts-based research. In J. G. Knowles & B. A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 72–82). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, S., Vonk, C., & Finley, M. L. (2014). At home at school: Critical arts-based research as public pedagogy. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 14(6), 619–625.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, N., & Rishbeth, C. (2006). Engaging with marginalised groups in public open space research: The potential of collaboration and combined methods. Planning Theory and Practice, 7(1), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, P. (2016). The story of summer visions: The creation of a new public in a community-engaged youth media program. Learning Landscapes, 10(1), 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glow, H., Johanson, K., & Kershaw, A. (2014). More yuppy stuff coming soon: Gentrification, cultural policy, social inclusion and the arts. Continuum, 28(4), 495–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S., Burke, K., & McKenna, M. (2013). Forms of voice: Exploring the empowerment of youth at the intersection of art and action. Urban Review, 45(3), 311–334.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. (2011). Art spaces in community and economic development: Connections to neighborhoods, artists, and the cultural economy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(1), 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., Foster, N., & Murdoch, J. (2018). Gentrification, displacement and the arts: Untangling the relationship between arts industries and place change. Urban Studies, 55(4), 807–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. (2006). Emotions and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(4), 367–382.
   Google Scholar
• Huss, E., & Cwikel, J. (2005). Researching creations: Applying arts-based research to Bedouin women’s drawings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Huss, E., Kaufman, R., Avgar, A., & Shouker, E. (2015). Using arts-based research to help visualize community intervention in international aid. International Social Work, 58(5), 673–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBO. (n.d.). What is TOK? Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/curriculum/theory-of-knowledge/what-is-tok/
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2011). Arts-based research as social justice activism insight, inquiry, imagination, embodiment, relationality a social justice approach to arts-based research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lundman, R. (2016). Bringing planning to the streets: Using site-specific video as a method for participatory urban planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(4), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., & Carabelli, G. (2016). Researching young people’s orientations to the future: The methodological challenges of using arts practice. Qualitative Research, 16(4), 430–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansson McGinty, A. (2013). Emotional geographies of veiling: The meanings of the hijab for five Palestinian American Muslim women. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(6), 683–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, V. (2010). Aestheticizing space: Art, gentrification and the city. Geography Compass, 4(6), 660–675.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, D. (2001). Place, teenagers and representations: Lessons from a community theatre project. Social and Cultural Geography, 2(4), 445–459.
   Google Scholar
• McKoy, D. L., & Vincent, J. M. (2007). Engaging schools in urban revitalization: The Y-PLAN (Youth-Plan, Learn, Act, Now!). Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(4), 389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, S. (2012). Art-based research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 29–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., … Curran, W. (2015). For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: an International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), 1236–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., Grodach, C., & Foster, N. (2016). The importance of neighborhood context in arts-led development: Community anchor or creative class magnet? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa, M. (2018). Insurgency, heritage and the working class: The case of the theatre of union No6 of the coal miners of Lota, Chile. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(4), 354–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, D. (2018). Are we asking the wrong questions in arts-based research? Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 352–368.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz Escalante, S., & Gutiérrez Valdivia, B. (2015). Planning from below: Using feminist participatory methods to increase women’s participation in urban planning. Gender & Development, 23(1), 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Passon, C., Levi, D., & Del Rio, V. (2008). Implications of adolescents’ perceptions and values for planning and design. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(1), 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L., Sandercock, L., Umemoto, K., Bates, L. K., Zapata, M. A., Kondo, M. C., … Sandercock, L. (2012). What’s love got to do with it? Illuminations on loving attachment in planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(4), 593–627.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, K. (2010). Making sense of place: Mapping as a multisensory research method. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(7), 539–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolling, J. H. (2010). A paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Studies in Art Education, 51(2), 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (Ed). (1998). Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2000). When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1), 13–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350050135176
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2004). Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 133–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2005). A new spin on the creative city: Artist/planner collaborations. Planning Theory and Practice, 6(1), 101–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L., & Attili, G. (2010). Digital ethnography as planning praxis: An experiment with film as social research, community engagement and policy dialogue. Planning Theory and Practice, 11(1), 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, E. L., & Ortiz Escalante, S. (2015). Bringing bodies into planning: Visceral methods, fear and gender violence. Urban Studies, 52(10), 1826–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, E. L., & Ortiz Escalante, S. (2016). Engaging territorio cuerpo – tierra through body and community mapping: A methodology for making communities safer. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(4), 594–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E., & Ellis, C. (2004). Cities as art: Exploring the possibility of an aesthetic dimension in planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(1), 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
   Google Scholar
• Voon, C. (2017). Austin becomes newest US city to introduce artist-in-residence program. Retrieved from https://hyperallergic.com/350812/austin-becomes-newest-us-city-to-introduce-artist-in-residence-program/
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. A., Rutherford, G., & Crough, M. (2013). Arts-based research: Creating social change for incarcerated women. Creative Approaches to Research, 6(1), 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Coemans, S., Siegesmund, R., & Hannes, K. (2017). Arts-based methods in socially engaged research practice: A classification framework. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 5–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. B., McGrath, S., & Young, J. (2012). The emotional city: Refugee settlement and neoliberal urbanism in calgary. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 13(1), 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L. (2003). The “place” of street children in Kampala, Uganda: Marginalisation, resistance, and acceptance in the urban environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(5), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Barrett, H. (2001). Adapting visual methods: Action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33(2), 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitcer, A. (2018). Making up creative placemaking. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18773424
   Google Scholar
• Zitcer, A., Hawkins, J., & Vakharia, N. (2016). A capabilities approach to arts and culture? Theorizing community development in West Philadelphia. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar