References
- Abram, S., & Cowell, R. (2004). Learning policy – The contextual curtain and conceptual barriers. European Planning Studies, 12(2), 209–228.
- Ahmadian, E., Byrd, H., Sodagar, B., Matthewman, S., Kenney, C., & Mills, G. (2019). Energy and the form of cities: The counterintuitive impact of disruptive technologies. Architectural Science Review, 62(2), 145–151.
- Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633.
- Balz, V. E. (2018). Regional design: Discretionary approaches to regional planning in The Netherlands. Planning Theory, 17(3), 332–354.
- Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Department of Planning and Urban Growth. (1990). Urban development options for victoria: A discussion paper. Melbourne: Author.
- Faludi, A. (1987). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
- Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Guerra, E., & Morris, E. A. (2018). Cities, automation, and the self-parking elephant in the room. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 291–297.
- Harris, J. (2018). Autonomous vehicles – A planner’s response. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 761–764.
- Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
- Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching Beyond the Horizon. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
- Kytta, M., Kahila-Tani, M., & Broberg, A. (2019). Helsinki, Finland: Social sustainability of urban settings – Contextually sensitive, participatory approach utilizing PPGIS methodology. In S. Darchen & G. Searle (Eds.), Global planning innovations for urban sustainability (pp. 26–41). Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Leigh, N. G., & Lee, H. (2019). Sustainable and resilient urban water systems: The role of decentralization and planning. Sustainability, 11, 918.
- Maginn, P. (2007). Deliberative democracy or discursively biased? Perth’s dialogue with the city initiative. Space & Polity, 11(3), 331–352.
- Raco, M. (2008). Key worker housing, welfare reform and the new spatial policy in England. Regional Studies, 42(5), 737–751.
- Reardon, L. (2018). Ensuring good governance: The role of planners in the development of autonomous vehicles. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 773–776.
- Searle, G., & Bunker, R. (2010). Metropolitan strategic planning: An Australian paradigm? Planning Theory, 9(3), 163–180.
- Skrimizea, E., Haniotou, H., & Parra, C. (2019). On the ‘complexity turn’ in planning: An adaptive rationale to navigate spaces and times of uncertainty. Planning Theory, 18(1), 122–142.
- Stein, L. (2018). Comparative urban land use planning: Best practice. Sydney: Sydney University Press.