Planning Just Futures

References

• Barry, J., & Agyeman, J. (2020a). On belonging and becoming in the settler-colonial city: Co-produced futurities, placemaking, and urban planning in the United States. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 1(1–2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/26884674.2020.1793703
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, G. L. (Ed.). (2012). Walking the clouds: An anthology of indigenous science fiction. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorries, H. (2017, October 12–15). The uses of stories and the imaginary infrastructure of cities or Weesakeechak’s New Condo. [Conference presentation]. American Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Kaopua, N. (2011). Kuleana Lahui: Collective responsibility for Hawaiian nationhood in activists’ praxis. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action.
   Google Scholar
• Harjo, H. (2020). Mississippian Black Metal Grl on a Friday Night (2018) with artist’s statement. In E. T. Lethabo King, J. Navarro, & A. Smith (Eds.), Otherwise Worlds (pp. 291–294). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harjo, L. (2012). Muscogee (Creek) Nation: Blueprint for a seven generation plan [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California]. USC Digital Library.https://uosc.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01USC_INST/273cgt/cdi_proquest_journals_1026571029
   Google Scholar
• Harjo, L. (2019). Spiral to the stars: Mvskoke tools of futurity. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., & Crookes, L. (2016, November 3–6). Making hope possible?: The challenges of playing with planning’s future orientation [Conference presentation]. American Collegiate Schools of Planning 2016 Conference, Portland, OR, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Jojola, T. (2013). Indigenous planning: Towards a seven generations model. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous Planning (pp. 457–472). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jolivétte, A. (2015). Research justice: Radical love as a strategy for social transformation. In A. Jolivétte (Ed.), Research Justice: Methodologies for Social Change (pp. 5–12). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaPensée, E. (2014). Survivance as an indigenously determined game. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011401000305
   Google Scholar
• Matunga, H. (2013). Theorizing indigenous planning. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous planning (pp. 3–32). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., & Robertson, K. (2020). The countdown remix: Why two native feminists ride with Queen Bey. In T. Lethabo King, J. Navarro, & A. Smith (Eds.), Otherwise Worlds (pp. 297–319). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. B. (2013). Islands of decolonial love: Stories & songs. ARP Books (Arbeiter Ring Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, E. L. (2021). Anti-Blackness/Nativeness and erasure in Mexico: Black feminist geographies and Latin American decolonial dialogues for US urban planning. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 2(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/26884674.2021.1877581
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2013). Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(1) 72–89.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2021). 10 things to know about indigenous peoples by UNDP. United Nations Development Programme. https://stories.undp.org/10-things-we-all-should-know-about-indigenous-people
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (2006). Time. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406063779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amitai, E. (1967). Mixed-Scanning: A ‘third’ approach to decision-making. Public Administration Review, 27(5), 85–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhan, G. (2019). Notes on a Southern urban practice. Environment and Urbanization, 31(2), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818815792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices. In The logic of practice (pp. 52–79). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, A. L. (2018). Say its name – Planning is the white spatial imaginary, or reading McKittrick and Woods as planning text. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 254–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dery, M. (1993). Black to the future: Interviews with Samuel R. Delany, Greg Tate, and Tricia Rose. The South Atlantic Quarterly. Duke University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1985). La Guerre du faux (M. Tanant, Trans.). Editions Grasset & Fasquelle.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the plurvierse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative? Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harjo, L. (2019). Spiral to the stars: Mvskok tools of futurity. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. D. G. (2002). Freedom dreams: The black radical imagination. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. (2019). Planning for street trees and human–nature relations: Lessons from 600 years of street tree planting in Paris. Journal of Planning History, 18(4): 282–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513218820525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., & Inch, A. (2019). On time and planning: Opening futures by cultivating a “sense of now”. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412218817775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaValle, V., & Adams, J. J. (Eds.). (2019). A people’s future of the United States: Speculative fiction from 25 extraordinary writers. One World.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. J. (2018). If I built the world, imagine that: Reflecting on world building practices in black Los Angeles. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 254–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (1997). The god of small things. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. (1992). Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9201200103
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. (1996). Planning as persuasive storytelling: The rhetorical construction of Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yftachel, O. (2016). The Aleph – Jerusalem as critical learning. City, 20(3), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1166702
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., & Agyeman, J. (2020). On belonging and becoming in the settler-colonial city: Co-produced futurities, placemaking, and urban planning in the United States. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bina, O. (2013). The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 31(6), 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bina, O., Inch, A., & Pereira, L. (2020a). Beyond techno-utopia and its discontents: On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary. Futures, 115, 102475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review headline messages. HM Treasury, Open Government Licence v3.0. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957629/Dasgupta_Review_-_Headline_Messages.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2018). Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory, Planning Theory, 17(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T., Walker, B., Biggs, R., Crépin, A. S., Folke, C., Lambin, E. F., Peterson, G. D., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Steffen, W., & Troell, M. (2015). Synchronous failure: The emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07681-200306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary. Tulika Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (Ed.) (2018). Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. UNESCO and Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, L., & Bina, O. (2020). The IPBES conceptual framework: Enhancing the space for plurality of knowledge systems and paradigms. In J. C. Pereira & A. Saramago (Eds.), Non-human nature in world politics: Theory and practice (pp. 311–335). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, S. (2021). Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the wisdom of the forest. Knopf Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, R. A. (2012). Integral futures. In A. Curry (Ed.), The future of futures (pp. 27–31). Association of Professional Futurists.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, D. (2003). Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2012). Urban Patterns for a green economy working with nature. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/getPage.asp?page=bookView&book=3341
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2015). Urban ecosystems and resource management (Issues Paper 16). Habitat III. https://www.habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/knowledge
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Making peace with nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34949/MPN_ESEN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). The United Nations decade on ecosystem restoration: Strategy. UN Decade. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31813/ERDStrat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, General Assemply. (October 21, 2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/Res/70/1).
   Google Scholar
• Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A. (2013). Series Ecology: Vol 31. Enlivenment: Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Heinrich Böll Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Welden, E., Chausson, A., & Melanidis, M. S. (2021). Leveraging nature‐based solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature. People and Nature, 00, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10212
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Grove, K., Rickards, L., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Slow emergencies: Temporality and the racialized biopolitics of emergency governance. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519849263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, P., Doussard, M., & Weber, R. (2016). Reconstituting the state: City powers and exposures in Chicago’s infrastructure leases. Urban Studies 53(7), 1384–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014532962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2015). Planning matter: Acting with things. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bina, O., Inch, A., & Pereira, L. (2020). Beyond techno-utopia and its discontents: On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary. Futures 115: 102475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. (2011). A world of becoming. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. (2017). Urban struggles with financialization. Geography Compass 11(11), e12334. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., & Leite, F. (2020). The cost of New York City’s Hudson Yards redevelopment project (Working Paper Series 2020-2). Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis and Department of Economics, The New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harjo, L. (2019c). Spiral to the stars: Mvskoke tools of futurity. The University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta’s Vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association 64(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D., & Zapata, M. A. (2007). Engaging the future: Tools for effective planning practice. In L. D. Hopkins & M. Zapata (Eds.), Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects (pp. 1–18). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019). Shifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy. Urban Affairs Review 55(6), 1666–1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417752475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2007). Promoting the community future in the contest with present individualism. In L. D. Hopkins & M. Zapata (Eds.), Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects (pp. 59–78). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Kitsuse, A. (2000). Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, D. (2019). On trend: The business of forecasting the future. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A. (2011). Collateral knowledge: Legal reasoning in the global financial markets. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2019). Anticipatory knowledge: How development consultants see the future. In M. Raco & F. Savini (Eds.), Planning and knowledge: How new forms of technocracy are shaping contemporary cities (pp. 91–102). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2020). Embedding futurity in urban governance: Redevelopment schemes and the time value of money. Environment & Planning A, 0308518X20936686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abensour, M. (2008). Persistent utopia. Constellations, 15(3), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00501.x
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. M. (2017). Rethinking utopia: Place, power, affect. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, E. (1995). The principle of hope (3 Vols). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. (1982). Urban utopias in the twentieth century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganjavie, A. (2015). On the future of urban design: Fabricating the future through Bloch’s utopians. Planning Theory, 14(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213513256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garforth, L. (2009). No intentions? Utopian theory after the future. Journal for Cultural Research, 13(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580802674787
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2007). Planning as urban therapeutic. Environment & Planning A, 39(2), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (2010). Utopia as method, or the uses of the future. In M. Gordin, H. Tilley, & G. Prakash (Eds.), Utopia/ Dystopia: Conditions of historical possibility (pp. 21–44). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nadir, C. (2010). Utopian studies, environmental literature, and the legacy of an idea: Educating desire in Miguel Abensour and Ursula K. Le Guin. Utopian Studies, 21(1), 24–56 https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.21.1.0024
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, L. T. (2006). In defense of utopia. Diogenes, 53(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192106062432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2002). Practicing utopia: Sustaining cities. Disp, 38(148), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (1977). William Morris: Romantic to revolutionary. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. K., Towne, S. A., Jordan, C. P., & Lelliott, K. L. (Eds). (2018). Race and spatial imaginary: Planning otherwise. Planning Theory and Practice, 19(2), 254–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, M. ( Host). (2021, February 15). Anything for Selena: Exploring Selena’s legacy ( podcast). WBUR, Futuro. https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/02/15/anything-for-selena-podcast
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. (2020). Scenario planning for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D., & Zapata, M. A. (2007). Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. (2009). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C. S. (2004). Deus Ex Machina: Tradition, technology, and the Chicanafuturist art of Marion C. Martinez. Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 29(2), 55–92.
   Google Scholar
• Selena. (1995). Dreaming of You. [ Song recorded by Selena]. EMI Records, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., Camacho, A. E., & Schenk, T. (2012). A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 47–51. 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata, M. A., & Kaza, N. (2015). Radical uncertainty: Scenario planning for futures. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 42(4), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39059
   Google Scholar