Displacing Conflicting Goals in Planning for Sustainability? Insights from Three Norwegian Cities

References

• Amundsen, H., Christiansen, P., Hanssen, G. S., Hofstad, H., Tønnesen, A., & Westskog, H. (2019). Byvekstavtaler i et flernivåperspektiv: helhetlig styringsverktøy med demokratiske utfordringer [City growth agreements in a multilevel perspective: Comprehensive management tool with democratic challenges] (No. 13). CICERO.
   Google Scholar
• Antonson, H., Isaksson, K., Storbjörk, S., & Hjerpe, M. (2016). Negotiating climate change responses: Regional and local perspectives on transport and coastal zone planning in South Sweden. Land Use Policy, 52, 297–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen Municipality. (2016). Grønn strategi [Green strategy]. https://www.bergen.kommune.no/api/rest/filer/V304556
   Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., Patterson, J., & Van Assche, K. (2017). Governing for resilience: the role of institutional work. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 10–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, A., Glaas, E., & Karlson, M. (2020). Integrating sustainable stormwater management in urban planning: Ways forward towards institutional change and collaborative action. Water, 12(1), 203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (2016). The planner's triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can't stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 388–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V. (2015). Contradiction, intervention, and urban low carbon transitions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/d13050p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuso Nerini, F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M., Borrion, A., Spataru, C., Castán Broto, V., Anandarajah, G., Milligan, B., & Mulugetta, Y. (2018). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R. (2004). Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H. (2014). Climate change, environmental governance and the scale problem. Geography Compass, 8(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12111.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2019). The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 873–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2009). Class, community and communicative planning: Urban redevelopment at King's Cross, London. Antipode, 41(2), 348–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00676.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2017). Imagining the carbon neutral city: The (post) politics of time and space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1762–1778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16680617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2015). The political dynamics of green transformations. In I. Scoones, M. Leach, & P. Newell (Eds.), The politics of green transformations (pp. 86–101). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2020). Transforming climate governance? Why climate governance is failing and what to do about it. In K. Hölscher & N. Frantzeskaki (Eds.), Transformative climate governance: A capacities perspective to systematise, evaluate and guide climate action (pp. 431–445). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2010). Connectivity and contingency in planning. Planning Theory, 9(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210371162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseland, S. E. (2019). Breaking silos: Can cities break down institutional barriers in climate planning? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623657.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2011). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth's Future, 5(11), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogaland County Council. (2015). Prosjekt sykehusutbygging – Helse Stavanger HF (SUS) – Høringsuttalelse til konseptrapport [Project hospital expansion – Stavanger Health Hospital – Public hearing statement of concept report]. https://einnsynrfk.public.cloudservices.no/application/getMoteDokument?dokid=200407839-545702
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2011). The purpose of planning: Creating sustainable towns and cities. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saglie, I.-L., Hofstad, H., & Hanssen, G. S. (2015). Hvordan studere motstridende hensyn i den kompakte byen? [How to study opposing considerations in the compact city?]. In G. S. Hanssen, H. Hofstad, & I.-L. Saglie (Eds.), Kompakt byutvikling: Muligheter og utfordringer [Compact city development: Opportunities and challenges]. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Watson, M., & Spurling, N. (2015). Conceptualizing connections: Energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaiser, V., Ranganathan, S., Swain, R. B., & Sumpter, D. J. (2017). The sustainable development oxymoron: Quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(6), 457–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statens Vegvesen, R. V. (2017). Byutredning for Bergen [City development analysis for Bergen]. https://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/2660041/binary/1321892?fast_title=Byutredning+trinn + 1+Bergen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stavanger Municipality. (2018). Klima- og miljøplan 2018–2030 [Climate and environmental plan 2018–2030]. https://www.stavanger.kommune.no/renovasjon-og-miljo/miljo-og-klima/klima–og-miljoplan-2018-2030/#klima-og-milj-planen
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229752.
   Google Scholar
• Storbynettverket. (2017). Statens medvirkning til å realisere mål i bymiljøavtaler og byutviklingsavtaler. [The States participation in fulfilling goals in the city environmental agreements and city development agreements.] Letter to the Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation, April 5th 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 213–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A., & Øksenholt, K. V. (2018). The impact of changed structural conditions on regional sustainable mobility planning in Norway. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1408135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondheim kommune (2017). Kommunedelplan: Energi og Klima. 2017–2030 [Municipal subplan: Energy and Climate. 2017–2030]. https://www.trondheim.kommune.no/globalassets/10-bilder-og-filer/10-byutvikling/miljoenheten/klima-og-energi/kommunedelplan-energi-og-klima130618.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uittenbroek, C. J. (2016). From policy document to implementation: Organizational routines as possible barriers to mainstreaming climate adaptation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1065717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinge, H. (2018). Farmland conversion to fight climate change? Resource hierarchies, discursive power and ulterior motives in land use politics. Journal of Rural Studies, 64, 20–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Westskog, H., Selvig, E., Amundsen, H., Mygland, R. (2018). Local quality. A strategy for transition to a low-emissions society. https://www.kortreistkvalitet.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Kortreist-Kvalitet-Engelsk.v4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wangel, J. (2011). Exploring social structures and agency in backcasting studies for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 872–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westskog, H., Amundsen, H., Christiansen, P., & Tønnesen, A. (2020). Urban contractual agreements as an adaptive governance strategy: Under what conditions do they work in multi-level cooperation? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1784115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar