“A Difficult Balancing Act”: What Planning Involves

References

• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Planners as market actors: Rethinking state–market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2), 187–207, 10.1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759631
   Google Scholar
• Alfasi, N. (2004). The meaning of words in urban conflicts: Language, argumentation patterns and local politics in Israel. Urban Studies, 41(11), 2139–2157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000268384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 89–103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41427930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuler, A. (1965). The city planning process: A political analysis. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0170840603024001341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale, W. H. (1978). Rhetorical performative discourse: A new theory of epideictic. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 11(4), 221–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolan, R. S. (1980). The practitioner as theorist: The phenomenology of the professional episode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368008977042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briassoulis, H. (1999). Who plans whose sustainability? Alternative roles for planners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(6), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569910885
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhler, T. (2021). When vagueness is a strategic resource for planning actors. Planning Theory, 20(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095221995861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calgary, City of. (2009). Municipal development plan. https://www.calgary.ca/content/dam/www/pda/pd/documents/municipal-development-plan/mdp-municipal-development-plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (1998). Acting on principle: Dilemmas in planning practice. Planning Practice & Research, 13(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459816139
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Utilitarianism’s bad breath: A re-evaluation of the public interest justification of planning. Planning Theory, 1(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F147309520200100205
   Google Scholar
• Castro, C. J. (2004). Sustainable development: Mainstream and critical perspectives. Organization & Environment, 17(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1086026604264910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, I., & Goodchild, B. (2000). Social mix and the ‘balanced community’ in British housing policy – A tale of two epochs. GeoJournal, 51(4), 351–360. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41147535
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (1974). The terms of political discourse. DC Heath and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Day, K. (2003). New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0739456X03255424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. (2003). Towards smart growth: The difficult implementation of alternatives to urban dispersion. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12(1), 48–70. http://cip-icu.ca/Files/Canadian-Planning-and-Policy-Journal/Articles/Volume-12-No-1-2003/filion.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. (2009). The mixed success of nodes as a smart growth planning policy. Environment and Planning B, 36(3), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1068/2Fb33145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkler, L., & Grant, J. L. (2011). Minimum separation distance bylaws for group homes: The negative side of planning regulation. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 20(1), 33–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26193839
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. L. (1960). British town planning: One ideology or three? The British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/586747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1980). Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368008977043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368708976450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1997). Learning from practice: Democratic deliberations and the promise of planning practice. Monograph, Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999a). Reflections on the future understanding of planning practice. International Planning Studies, 4(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479908721734
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999b). The deliberative practitioner. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault, power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2014). Informal strategies of power in the local planning system. Planning Theory, 13(3), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1473095213492512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016). Self-perceptions of the role of the planner. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0265813515603860
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. (1961). The balanced community: Homogeneity or heterogeneity in residential areas? Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27(3), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366108978452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R. (2004). Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, B., & Cole, I. (2001). Social balance and mixed neighbourhoods in Britain since 1979: A review of discourse and practice in social housing. Environment and Planning D, 19(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012049526513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Dictionary. (2021). Define balance. Retrieved September 2, 2021, from https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=define±balance
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (1994). The drama of democracy: Contention and dispute in community planning. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (2006). Planning the good community: New urbanism in theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (2009). Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: Challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Planning Theory & Practice, 10 (1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802661683
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (1998). Connecting linguistic structures and social practices: A discursive approach to social policy analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 27(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279498005248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (1999a). Discourse and urban change: An introduction to the special issue. Urban Studies, 36(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2F0042098993691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (1999b). Analyzing power relations in partnerships: Is there a role for discourse analysis? Urban Studies, 36(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/2F0042098993754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, A., & Manzi, T. (1999). Managing the ‘underclass’: Interpreting the moral discourse of housing management. Urban Studies, 36(1), 153–165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43084375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40113141
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1999). Sites, jobs and portfolios: Economic development discourses in the planning system. Urban Studies, 36(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/2F0042098993718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (1999). Key themes and future prospects: Conclusion to the special issue. Urban Studies, 36(1), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/2F0042098993826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research, 24(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (1983). Fact and value in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368308977066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R., & Gibbs, D. (2008). Third Wave’ sustainability? Smart growth and regional development in the USA. Regional Studies, 42(9), 1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801968403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2004). Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1191/2F0309132504ph473pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035
   Google Scholar
• Mann, P. H. (1958). The socially balanced neighbourhood unit. Town Planning Review, 29(2), 91–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40102340
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0739456X0202100302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. R., & Neill, W. J. V. (2011). Strategic spatial planning in-Berlin-Brandenburg: A requiem for balanced development? Planning Practice & Research, 26(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.542067
   Google Scholar
• National HMO Lobby. (2008). Balanced communities & studentification: Problems and solutions. http://hmolobby.org.uk/39articles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nottingham (UK) City Council. (2007). Building balanced communities supplementary planning document. https://nottinghaminsight.org.uk/d/aAXC2h8
   Google Scholar
• Oakville (ON), Town of Canada. (2009). Livable Oakville. (2021 update and consolidation). https://www.oakville.ca/townhall/livable-oakville-official-plan.html
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, A. A. (1968). The self-contained new town: Employment and population. Town Planning Review, 39(1), 38–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40102598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2014). The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory, 13(3), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1473095213499340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario, Government of Ontario. (2006). Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. https://www.ontario.ca/document/growth-plan-greater-golden-horseshoe-2006
   Google Scholar
• Oxford (UK) City Council. (2008). Balance of dwellings: Supplementary planning document. https://www.oxford.gov.uk/downloads/download/143/balance_of_dwellings_spd
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2005). Sustainable development, rolled-out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode, 37(2), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2007). Securing sustainable communities: Citizenship, safety and sustainability in the new urban planning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0969776407081164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2009). Planners’ role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, W. (1976). The idea of social mix in town planning: An historical review. Urban Studies, 13(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987620080521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1982). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2008). The politics of studentification and ‘(un)balanced’ urban populations: Lessons for gentrification and sustainable communities? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2541–2564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, W. W.-L. (1979). An evaluation of selected social characteristics in the planning of a new town. Master’s report, Kansas State University. http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/9347/LD2668R41979S883.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Surrey (BC), City of Canada. (2010). Official community plan. By-law 12900. https://www.surrey.ca/sites/default/files/media/documents/OCP_Book_33_October_20_2014_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (2003). Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory, 2(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F14730952030022003
   Google Scholar
• Wargent, M., & Parker, G. (2020). The future of participation in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(3), 455–458.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for theory and ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000146318
   Google Scholar
• Ye, L., Mandpe, S., & Meyer, P. B. (2005). What is ‘smart growth’ – really? Journal of Planning Literature, 19(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0885412204271668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitcer, A. (2017). Planning as persuaded storytelling: The role of genre in planners’ narratives. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1363404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar