Compensating Downzoning. A Comparative Analysis of European Compensation Schemes in the Light of Net Land Neutrality

References

• Adelaja, A. O., & Gottlieb, P. D. (2009). The political economy of downzoning. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 38 (2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500003191.
   Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2006). Introduction: Regulatory takings viewed through cross-national comparative lenses. Global Studies Law Review, 5(3), 469–476. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol5/iss3/2/
   Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2010). Takings international: A comparative perspective on land use regulations and compensation rights. ABA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Battis, U., Mitschang, S., & Reidt, O. (2019). Baugesetzbuch: Kommentar [Building Code: Commentary]. (14th ed.). C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2017). Land use, planning, and the “difficult character of property”. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colsaet, A. (2019). Artificialisation des sols: quelles avancées politiques pour quels résultats? [Land take: what political progress for what results?] Iddri. Décryptage, N°02/19.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2021). How do upzonings impact neighborhood demographic change? Examining the link between land use policy and gentrification in New York City. Land Use Policy, 103, 105347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. (1996). Baulandsicherung: Ursache oder Lösung eines raumordnungspolitischen Paradoxons? [Securing building land: Cause or solution of a spatial planning policy paradox?] Zeitschrift Für Verwaltung, 21(2), 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• De Cruz, P. (2007). Comparative law in a changing world. Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, H. (2021). Exploring the impacts of zoning and upzoning on housing development: A quasi-experimental analysis at the parcel level. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, 739456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21990728.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011). Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe (COM/2011/0571). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/about/roadmap/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021). EU Soil strategy for 2030: Reaping the benefits of healthy soils for people, food, nature and climate. (COM/2021/699). https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12634-Healthy-soils-new-EU-soil-strategy_en
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights (2021). Guide on article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights: Protection of property. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_1_Protocol_1_ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fahrländer (2008). Bauzonen Schweiz Wie viele Bauzonen braucht die Schweiz? Schlussbericht [Building Zones Switzerland How many building zones does Switzerland need?] Final report 10. Oktober 2008. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung. http://www.news-service.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/13356.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order Dutch planning doctrine in the Twentieth century. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Freemark, Y. (2020). Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a zoning reform on property values and housing construction. Urban Affairs Review, 56(3), 758–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418824672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbe, C. J. (2018). Why are regulations changed? A parcel analysis of upzoning in Los Angeles. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17696034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D. (2016). The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – Evidence from practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D., Hartmann, T., & Hengstermann, A. (2018). Instruments of land policy: Dealing with scarcity of land. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D., & Nahrath, S. (2013). Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines Ressourcenansatzes der Nachhaltigkeit: eine Diskussion am Beispiel der Regulation der Bodenressource in der Schweiz [A contribution to the development of a resource approach to sustainability: a discussion using the example of land resource regulation in Switzerland]. (CRED Research Paper 3). Center for Regional Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, P. D. (2009). The impact of down-zoning on land values. A theoretical approach. Agricultural Finance Review, 69 (2), 206–227.
   Google Scholar
• Götze, V., & Hartmann, T. (2021). Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 109, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman, D. G., & Misczynski, D. J. (1978). Windfalls for wipeouts: Land value recapture and compensation., American Society of Planning Officials. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halleux, J.-M., Marcinczak, S., & Van der Krabben, E. (2012). The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29 (2012), 887–898.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Needham, B. (2012). Planning by law and property rights reconsidered. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Spit, T. (2015). Dilemmas of involvement in land management: Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42, 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengstermann, A., & Gerber, J.-D. (2015). Aktive Bodenpolitik – Eine Auseinandersetzung Vor Dem Hintergrund Der Revision Des Eidgenössischen Raumplanungsgesetzes [Active land policy – A discussion against the background of the revision of the Swiss spatial planning Act]. FuB, 2015(6), 241–250.).
   Google Scholar
• Hobma, F. (2010). New rules for planning compensation rights in the Netherlands. PLPR Conference. http://plpr-association.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PLPR2010_Paper_Hobma_F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huijts, J. H. M. (2020). Nadeelcompensatie en tegemoetkoming in planschade [Compensation for loss and compensation for planning damage]. Maastricht. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20200326jh.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, G. K., & Hong, Y.- H. P. (2012). Value capture and land policies, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. M. (2008). The future of the regulatory takings issue in the United States and Europe: Divergence or convergence? The Urban Lawyer, 40 (1), 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L. (2012). The Dutch office space tragedy: Unlocking the lock-in. In T. Hartmann and B. Needham (Eds.), Planning by law and property rights reconsidered (pp. 189–206). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jehling, M., & Hecht, R. (2021). Do land policies make a difference? A data driven approach to trace effects on urban form in France and Germany. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(1), 14–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808321995818.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2020). Upzoning and value capture: How U.S. local governments use land use regulation power to create and capture value from real estate developments. Land Use Policy, 95, 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacoere, P. (2020). De 25 gewestplannen, een collage van ruimtelijk overaanbod [The 25 regional land use plans, a collage of land oversupply]. Ruimte & Maatschappij, 38–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lacoere, P., Tindemans, H., Bouckaert, J., & Paelinck, M. (2021). Rapport Taskforce Bouwshift [Report Taskforce Bouwshift]. Advisory report to the regional minister of planning. https://www.hogent.be/sites/hogent/assets/File/Taskforce%20Bouwshift%20einddocument%202021-11-30.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lacoere, P., & Van Hoorick, G. (2021). Planschade vroeger, nu en straks: een moeilijke evenwichtsoefening [Planning damage as it was, as is, and to be: a difficult balance]. STORM, 2020(4), 02/01–02/13.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bivic, C., & Melot, R. (2020). Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris Region. Land Use Policy, 99, 105040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebel, R. (2014). Siedlungsflächenmanagement Schweiz: problemorientierte Flächenübersichten als zentrale Grundlage für eine Siedlungsentwicklung nach innen [Settlement area management in Switzerland: problem-oriented area overviews as a central basis for inward settlement development]. IRL-Bericht 7.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2006). Planning, law and economics: an investigation of the rules we make for using land. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2007). Dutch land-use planning: planning and managing land use in the Netherlands, the principles and the practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pirenne, H. (1975). Histoire de Belgique [History of Belgium]. Vol. IV. La renaissance du Livre.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, V. (2006). Compensation rights for reduction in property values due to planning decisions: The case of France. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 5, 523–534.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, V. (2009). Property rights protection and spatial planning in European countries. In K. I. Gregory and H. Yu-Hung. (Ed.). Property rights and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2003). Downzoning, fairness and farmland protection. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 19(1), L59.
   Google Scholar
• Satsangi, M., Hoolach’n, A., O'Brien, P., Dembski, S., Dunning, R., & Lord, A. (2020). Housing land allocation, assembly and delivery: Lessons from Europe. Scottish Land Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Serkin, C. (2005). The meaning of value: assessing just compensation for regulatory takings. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 677–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (2021). Land Degradation Neutrality. https://www.unccd.int/actions/achieving-land-degradation-neutrality
   Google Scholar
• van Zundert, C. (2018). Planschade [Planning damage]. Wolters Kluwer Navigator. https://www.navigator.nl/thema/1125/planschade
   Google Scholar
• Witt, W. F. Jr. (1989). Downzoning: Balancing public and private Interests, 3 PROB. & PROP.37.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, P., & Hartmann, T. (2022). An introduction to spatial planning in the Netherlands. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Wu, G., Kong, X., Luo, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Why should landowners in protected areas be compensated? A theoretical framework based on value capture. Land Use Policy, 95, 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaborowski, T. (2021). It’s All about Details. Why the Polish land policy framework fails to manage designation of developable land. Land, 10, 890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). Introduction to comparative law (3rd rev. ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar