Scrutinising the Plan-Ability of Outdoor Recreation in the Swedish Compact City: Continuing and Discontinuing Modernist Planning Legacies

References

• Asdal, K. (2015). What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., & Hobæk, B. (2016). Assembling the whale: Parliaments in the politics of nature. Science as Culture, 25(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1093744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., & Hobæk, B. (2020). The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from max weber. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720902847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., & Reinertsen, H. (2021). Doing document analysis: A practice-Oriented method. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Balikçi, S., Giezen, M., & Arundel, R. (2022). The paradox of planning the compact and green city: Analyzing land-use change in Amsterdam and Brussels. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(13), 2387–2411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1971069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N. A., Borodulin, K., Fahlen, J., Høyer-Kruse, J., & Iversen, E. B. (2019). National structures for building and managing sport facilities: A comparative analysis of the Nordic countries. Sport in Society, 22(4), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1389023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021
   Google Scholar
• Bjärstig, T., Thellbro, C., Stjernström, O., Svensson, J., Sandström, C., Sandström, P., & Zachrisson, A. (2018). Between protocol and reality – Swedish municipal comprehensive planning. European Planning Studies, 26(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1365819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, C., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., & Byrne, J. (2018). Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boverket. (2022). Mobilitet för ett aktivt vardagsliv [Mobility for an active everyday life]. https://www.boverket.se/sv/samhallsplanering/stadsutveckling/halsa-forst/aktiv-mobilitet/
   Google Scholar
• Braae, E. M., Riesto, S., Steiner, H., & Tietjen, A. (2020). Welfare landscapes: Open spaces of Danish social housing estated reconfiguerd. In M. Glendinning & S. Riesto (Eds.), Mass housing of the Scandinavian welfare states: Exploring histories and design strategies (pp. 13–23). University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Børrud, E. (2016). How wide is the border? Mapping the border between the city and the urban forest as a zone for outdoor recreation. In K. Jørgensen, M. Clemetsen, K. H. Thorén, & T. Richardson (Eds.), Mainstreaming landscape through the european landscape convention. Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, A., & Qviström, M. (2022). Situating the silence of recreation in transit-oriented development. International Planning Studies, 27(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2022.2129598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. (2022). Special eurobarometer 525 – Sport and physical activity. Country Factsheet Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., & Stenling, C. (2016). Sport policy in Sweden. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(3), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2015.1063530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemsæter, F., Setten, G., & Brown, K. M. (2015). Morality, mobility and citizenship: Legitimising mobile subjectivities in a contested outdoors. Geoforum, 64, 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R., Itkonen, H., Nevala, A., & Salmikangas, A.-K. (2019). Sport and civil society in the Nordic region. Sport in Society, 22(4), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1390906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurholt, K. P., & Broch, T. B. (2019). Outdoor life, nature experience, and sports in Norway: Tensions and dilemmas in the preservation and use of urban Forest. Sport in Society, 22(4), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1390938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaland, C., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., Kjærås, K., Røe, P. G., & Tveiten, K. (2023). Diversifying the compact city: A renewed agenda for geographical research. Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206221102949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. S. (2021). Understanding recreational landscapes – A review and discussion. Landscape Research, 46(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1833320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, R. (2019). Contested and constructed greenery in the compact city: A case study of Helsinki city plan 2016. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 14(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2019.1623543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, R., & Donner, J. (2021). Modern living in a forest – Landscape architecture of Finnish forest suburbs in the 1940s–1960s. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 104(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1989320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenborg, S., Fredman, P., Hansen, A. S., & Wolf-Watz, D. (2022). Outdoorification of sports and recreation: A leisure transformation under the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden. Annals of Leisure Research, 27(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2022.2101497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 59–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegetschweiler, K. T., de Vries, S., Arnberger, A., Bell, S., Brennan, M., Siter, N., Olafsson, A. S., Voigt, A., & Hunziker, M. (2017). Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hislop, M., Scott, A. J., & Corbett, A. (2019). What does good green infrastructure planning policy look like? Developing and testing a policy assessment tool within Central Scotland UK. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(5), 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1678667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idrottsutredningen. (1969). Idrott åt alla: betänkande [Sport for all: Report]. SOU, 1969, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, M. (2014). Green space in compact cities: The benefits and values of ecosystem services in planning. The Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 26(2), 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, M., & Schneider, J. (2023). The welfare landscape and densification – Residents’ relations to local outdoor environments affected by infill development. Land, 12(11), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kain, J.-H., Adelfio, M., Stenberg, J., & Thuvander, L. (2022). Towards a systemic understanding of compact city qualities. Journal of Urban Design, 27(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1941825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M., & Wirdelöv, J. (2019). The neighbourhood in pieces: The fragmentation of local public space in a Swedish housing area. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(5), 870–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjærås, K. (2021). Towards a relational conception of the compact city. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1176–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020907281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., & Verburg, P. H. (2019). Characterizing outdoor recreation user groups: A typology of peri-urban recreationists in the Kromme Rijn area, The Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 80, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Öckinger, E., & Ranius, T. (2022). Landscape usage by recreationists is shaped by availability: Insights from a national PPGIS survey in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227, 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2021). Green space and the compact city: Planning issues for a ‘new normal’. Cities & Health, 5(sup1), S212–S215. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1778843
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholst, A. C., Caspersen, O. H., & van den Bosch, C. C. K. (2015). Methods for mapping recreational and social values in urban green spaces in the Nordic countries and their comparative merits for urban planning. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Lisberg Jensen, E., Alkan Olsson, J., & Malmqvist, E. (2023). Growing inwards: Densification and ecosystem services in comprehensive plans from three municipalities in Southern Sweden. Sustainability, 15(13), 9928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. W., & Haas, T. (2020). New urbanism in the new urban agenda: Threads of an unfinished reformation. Urban Planning, 5(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Wiberg, S. (2017). Contested framings of urban qualities: Dis/qualifications of value in urban development controversies. Urban Studies, 55(10), 2300–2316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017712831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljödepartementet. (2017). Government communication 2017/18:230 Strategi för Levande städer – politik för en hållbar stadsutveckling [Strategy for living cities – Politics for a sustainable urban development].
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, F. (2020). ‘The miracle of density’: The socio‐material epistemics of urban densification. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(4), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson-Forsberg, L. (2014). Swedish spatial planning: A blunt instrument for the protection of outdoor recreation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 5–6, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2014.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Pries, J., & Qviström, M. (2021). The patchwork planning of a welfare landscape: Reappraising the role of leisure planning in the Swedish welfare state. Planning Perspectives, 36(5), 923–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2020.1867884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M., Bengtsson, J., & Vicenzotti, V. (2016). Part-time amenity migrants: Revealing the importance of second homes for senior residents in a transit-oriented development. Land Use Policy, 56, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rannila, P. (2021). Relationality of the law: On the legal collisions in the Finnish planning and land use practices. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18785443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Region Stockholm. (2018). RUFS 2050: regional utvecklingsplan för stockholmsregionen: Europas mest attraktiva storstadsregion. [RUFS 2050: Regional development plan for the Stockholm region: Europe’s most attractive metropolitan region].
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., & Cirella, G. T. (2018). Modern compact cities: How much greenery do we need? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., Salvo, D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Cain, K. L., Davey, R., Kerr, J., Lai, P.-C., Mitáš, J., Reis, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Schofield, G., Troelsen, J., Van Dyck, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Owen, N. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. Lancet (London, England), 387(10034), 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmaso, E. (2020). Skateparken står fortfarande stilla – över ett år senare [The skate park is at a standstill – over one year later] mitt i Upplands Väsby. https://www.mitti.se/nyheter/skateparken-star-fortfarande-stilla-over-ett-ar-senare/lmtbs!8000569/
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Smas, L. (2019). Shifting political conditions for spatial planning in the Nordic countries In. A. Eraydin & K. Frey (Eds.), Politics and conflict in governance and planning: Theory and practice (pp. 133–150). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Smas, L. (2020). Dissolution rather than consolidation – Questioning the existence of the comprehensive-Integrative planning model. Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1841973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setten, G., Stenseke, M., & Moen, J. (2012). Ecosystem services and landscape management: Three challenges and one plea. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.722127
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 1998:808. Environmental Code [Miljöbalk].
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 2010:900. Planning and Building Act [Plan- och bygglag].
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, A. (2016). From garden city to eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M., & Hansen, A. S. (2014). From rhetoric to knowledge based actions – Challenges for outdoor recreation management in Sweden. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 7-8, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2014.09.004
   Google Scholar
• ten Brink, P., Mutafoglu, K., Schweitzer, J.-P., Kettunen, M., Twigger-Ross, C., Baker, J., Kuipers, Y., Emonts, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Hujala, T. (2016). The health and social benefits of nature and biodiversity protection. A report for the European commission (ENV. B. 3/ETU/2014/0039). Institute for European Environmental Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Tunström, M. (2007). The vital city: constructions and meanings in the contemporary Swedish planning discourse. Town Planning Review, 78(6), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.78.6.2
   Google Scholar
• Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby Kommun. (2016). Utvecklingsplan för ekosystemtjänster i Upplands Väsby Kommun [Development plan for ecosystem services in Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (1976). Fritidsplan 1976–1980 [Leisure plan 1976–1980].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2005). Framtidens Upplands Väsby – ”Den moderna småstaden”. Strategisk kommunplan 2005–2020 [Future Upplands Väsby – “The modern small town”. Strategical municipal plan 2005-2020].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2008). Vilundaparken planprogram. Samrådshandling [Vilundaparken planning programme, consultation document].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2013). Stadsmässighet – definition för Upplands Väsby kommun [Urban Qualities – Definition for Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2017). Detaljplan för Järnvägsparken [Detailed development plan for The Railway Park].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2018a). Detaljplan för Östra Runby med Väsby stationsområde [Detailed development plan for East Rundby with Väsby station area].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2018b). Investeringsanmälan – Skatepark Smedby KS/2018:332 [Investment notification – Skate park Smedby]
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2018c). Stadsmässighetsdefinition för Upplands Väsby kommun [Definition of Urban qualities for Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2018d). Väsby Idrottsstad, Vilundaparken, Förslag till planprogram [Väsby sport city, Vilundaparken. Proposal for planning programme].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2018e). Väsby Stad 2040. Ny översiktsplan för Upplands Väsby kommun [Väsby City 2040. New comprehensive plan for Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2019a). Aktiv hela livet – Idrottsstrategisk plan för Upplands Väsby kommun [Active through life – Sports strategy for Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2019b). Förslag på placering av skatepark i Vilundaparken KFN/2017:1 [Proposal for localisation of skate park in Vilundaparken]
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2019c). Sammanträdesprotokoll kultur- och fritidsnämnden 2019-06-18 [Minutes, culture and leisure committee 2019-06-18].
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun. (2022). Vilunda fotbollshall har öppnat [Vilunda football hall has opened]. https://www.upplandsvasby.se/arkiv/nyheter/2022-04-01-vilunda-fotbollshall-har-oppnat.html
   Google Scholar
• Upplands Väsby kommun & Ekologigruppen. (2016). Utvecklingsplan för ekosystemtjänster i Upplands Väsby Kommun [Development plan for ecosystem services in Upplands Väsby municipality].
   Google Scholar
• Valve, H., Åkerman, M., & Kaljonen, M. (2013). ‘You only start filling in the boxes’: Natural resource management and the politics of plan-ability. Environment and Planning A, 45(9), 2084–2099.
   Google Scholar
• Valve, H., Kaljonen, M., Kauppila, P., & Kauppila, J. (2017). Power and the material arrangements of a river basin management plan: The case of the archipelago sea. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1615–1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1308470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valve, H., Lazarevic, D., & Pitzén, S. (2022). The co-evolution of policy realities and environmental liabilities: Analysing the ontological work of policy documents. Geoforum, 128, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valzania, G. (2022). Towers once in the park: Uprooting Toronto’s welfare landscapes. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 104(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2032256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalar, A., & Pries, J. (2022). Unmapping green space: Discursive dispossession of the right to green space by a compact city planning epistemology. City, 26(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.2018860
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Zhang, Y., Fu, L., Xue, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Assessing mini-park installation priority for regreening planning in densely populated cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar