‘Geographies of dying and death’ in relation to pregnancy losses: ultrasonography experiences

References

• AzaryahuM. (2000). The spontaneous formation of memorial space. The case of Kikar Rabin, Tel Aviv. Area, 28, 501–513. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20003735.
   Google Scholar
• BhuttaZ., YakoobM., LawnJ., RizviA., FribergI., WeissmanE., … GoldenbergR. (2011). Stillbirths: What difference can we make and at what cost?The Lancet, 377, 1523–1538. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62269-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BleyenJ. (2010). The materialities of absence after stillbirth: Historical perspectives. In J.Hockey, C.Komaromy, & K.Woodthorpe (Eds.), The matter of death: Space, place and materiality (pp. 69–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• BleyenJ. (2012). Hiding babies: How birth professionals make sense of death and grief. In S.Earle, C.Komaromy, & L.Layne (Eds.), Understanding reproductive loss: Perspectives on life, death and fertility (pp. 179–191). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• BossP. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CacciatoreJ., DeFrainJ., & JonesK. (2008). When a baby dies: Ambiguity and stillbirth. Marriage & Family Review, 44, 439–454. doi:10.1080/01494920802454017.
   Google Scholar
• CecilR. (1994). Miscarriage: Women's views of care. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 12, 21–29. doi:10.1080/02646839408408864.
   Google Scholar
• ConveryI., BaileyC., MortM., & BaxterJ. (2005). Death in the wrong place? Emotional geographies of the UK 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavidsonD. (2007). The emergence of hospital protocols for perinatal loss 1950–2000 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). York University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• DokaK. (2002). Introduction. In K.Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges and strategies for practice (pp. 5–22). Champaign: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• DorlingD., NewmanM., & BarfordA. (2010). The atlas of the real world: Mapping the way we live. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• DossE. (2002). Death, art and memory in the public sphere: The visual and material culture of grief in contemporary America. Mortality, 7, 63–82. doi:10.1080/13576270120102553.
   Google Scholar
• DossE. (2010). Memorial mania: Public feeling in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• FooteK., & GriderS. (2010). Memorialisation of US college and university tragedies: Spaces of mourning and remembrance. In A.Maddrell & J.Sidaway, 2010 (Eds.), Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and remembrance (pp. 181–205). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• FrancisD., KellaherL., & NeophytouG. (2005). The secret cemetery. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• FranklinS. (1991). Fetal fascinations: New dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In S.Franklin, C.Lury, & J.Stacey (Eds.), Off centre: Feminism and cultural studies (pp. 190–205). London: HarperCollinsAcademic.
   Google Scholar
• FranklinS. (1999). Dead embryos: Feminism in suspension. In L.Morgan & M.Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 61–82). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• FrøenJ., CacciatoreJ., McClureE., KutiO., Hakeem JokhioA., IslamM., & ShiffmanJ. (2011). Stillbirths: Why they matter. The Lancet, 377, 1353–1366. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62232-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallamE., HockeyJ., & HowarthG. (1999). Beyond the body: Death and social identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HartouniV. (1997). Cultural conceptions: On reproductive technologies and the remaking of life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• HartouniV. (1999). Epilogue: Reflections on abortion politics and the practices called person. In L.Morgan & M.Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 272–296). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• HockeyJ., & DraperJ. (2005). Beyond the womb and the tomb: Identity, (dis)embodiment and the life course. Body & Society, 11, 41–57. doi:10.1177/1357034X05052461.
   Google Scholar
• HockeyJ., KomaromyC., & WoodthorpeK. (2010). Materialising absence. In J.Hockey, C.Komaromy, & K.Woodthorpe (Eds.), The Matter of death: Space, place and materiality (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• IvryT. (2010). Embodying culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• JenkinsG., & InhornM. (2003). Reproduction gone awry: Medical anthropological perspectives. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1831–1836. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00207-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeaneH. (2009). Foetal personhood and representations of the absent child in pregnancy loss memorialization. Feminist Theory, 10, 153–171. doi:10.1177/1464700109104922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KevinC. (2011). ‘I did not lose my baby… My baby just died’: Twenty-first-century discourses of miscarriage in political and historical context. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 110, 849–865. doi:10.1215/00382876-1382285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KitzingerC., & WilkinsonS. (1997). Validating Women's experience? Dilemmas in feminist research. Feminism and Psychology, 7, 566–574. doi:10.1177/0959353597074012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KomaromyC. (2000). The sight and sound of death: The management of dead bodies in residential and nursing homes for older people. Mortality, 5, 299–315. doi:10.1080/713686009.
   Google Scholar
• LayneL. (1996). ‘Never such innocence again’: Irony and technoscience in narratives of pregnancy loss. In R.Cecil (Ed.), The anthropology of pregnancy loss: Comparative studies in miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death (pp. 131–152). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• LayneL. (2000). ‘He was a real baby with baby things’: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture, 5, 321–345. doi:10.1177/135918350000500304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LayneL. (2003). Motherhood lost: A feminist account of pregnancy loss in America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LetherbyG. (1993). The meanings of miscarriage. Women's Studies International Forum, 16, 165–180. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(93)90006-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LonghurstR. (2001). Bodies: Exploring fluid boundaries. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• LudlowJ. (2008). Sometimes, it's a child and a choice: Toward an embodied abortion praxis. Feminist Formations, 20, 26–50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40071251.
   Google Scholar
• MaddrellA. (2009). A place for grief and belief: The witness Cairn, Isle of Whithorn, Galloway, Scotland. Social & Cultural Geography, 10, 675–693. doi:10.1080/14649360903068126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaddrellA. (2009b). Mapping changing shades of grief and consolation in the historical landscape of St. Patrick's Isle, Isle of man. In M.Smith, J.Davidson, L.Cameron, & L.Bondi (Eds.), Emotion, Place and Culture (pp. 35–55). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• MaddrellA., & SidawayJ. (2010). Introduction: Bringing a Spatial Lens to Death, Dying, Mourning and Remembrance. In A.Maddrell & J.Sidaway (Eds.), Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and remembrance (pp. 1–16). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• MalacridaC. (1999). Complicating mourning: The social economy of perinatal death. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 504–519. doi:10.1177/104973299129122036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeanA., & FlynnC. (2012). ‘It's not just a pap-smear’: Women speak of their experience of hospital treatment after miscarriage. Qualitative Social Work, 0(00), 1–17, [Online Release]. 10.1177/1473325012464099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNivenA. (2014). (Re)collections: Engaging feminist geography with embodied and relational experiences of pregnancy losses (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Durham University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• MichaelsM., & MorganL. (1999). Introduction: The fetal imperative. In L.Morgan & M.Michaels, (1999) (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 1–9). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Miscarriage Association. (2013). Information Retrieved from www.miscarriageassociation.org.uk/information.
   Google Scholar
• MitchellL. (2001). Baby's first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• MorganL. (1996). Fetal relationality in feminist philosophy: An anthropological critique. Hypatia, 11, 47–70. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01015.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MoulderC. (1994). Towards a preliminary framework for understanding pregnancy loss. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 12, 65–67. doi:10.1080/02646839408408869.
   Google Scholar
• MurphyS. (2012). Bereaved parents: A contradiction in terms? In S.Earle, C.Komaromy, & L.Layne (Eds.), Understanding reproductive loss: Perspectives on life, death and fertility (pp. 117–127). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012). Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management in early pregnancy of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. (Accessed 12 December 2012) www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14000/61860/61860.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OaksL. (19991999). Irish trans/national politics and locating fetuses. In L.Morgan & M.Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 175–198). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• PeelE., & CainR. (2012). ‘Silent’ miscarriage and deafening heteronormativity: A british experiential and critical feminist account. In S.Earle, C.Komaromy, & L.Layne (Eds.), Understanding reproductive loss: Perspectives on life, death and fertility (pp. 79–91). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• PetcheskyR. (1987). Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In M.Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine (pp. 57–80). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• PriceS. (2008). Women and reproductive loss: Client-worker dialogues designed to break the silence. National Association of Social Workers, 53, 367–376. doi:10.1093/sw/53.4.367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReaganL. (2003). From hazard to blessing to tragedy: Representations of miscarriage in twentieth-century America. Feminist Studies, 29, 356–378. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothmanB. (2007a). Introduction: A lifetime's labor: Women and power in the birthplace. In W.Simonds, B.Rothman, & B.Norman, (2007) (Eds.), Laboring on: Birth in transition in the United States (pp. xi–xxii). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RothmanB. (2007b). Laboring now: Current cultural constructions of pregnancy, birth, and mothering. In W.Simonds, B.Rothman, & B.Norman, (2007) (Eds.), Laboring on: Birth in transition in the United States (pp. 29–93). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RowlandsI., & LeeC. (2010). ‘The silence was deafening’: Social and health service support after miscarriage. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28, 274–286. doi:10.1080/02646831003587346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sands. (2013). What is why 17? (Accessed 27 June 2013) www.why17.org/Why17-Home.html.
   Google Scholar
• SarginG. (2004). Displaced memories, or the architecture of forgetting and remembrance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 659–680. doi:10.1068/d311t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimondsW., & RothmanB. (1992). Centuries of solace: Expressions of maternal grief in popular literature. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SmallN., & HockeyJ. (2001). Discourse into practice: The production of bereavement care. In J.Hockey, J.Katz, & N.Small (Eds.), Grief, mourning and death ritual (pp. 97–124). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• StabileC. (1999). The traffic in fetuses. In L.Morgan & M.Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 133–158). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorJ. (2004). A fetish is born: Sonographers and the making of the public fetus. In J.Taylor, L.Layne, & D.Wozniak (Eds.), Consuming motherhood (pp. 187–210). London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TeatherE. (2001). The case of the disorderly graves: Contemporary deathscapes in Guangzhou. Social & Cultural Geography, 2, 185–202. doi:10.1080/14649360120047805.
   Google Scholar
• WalterT. (1999). On bereavement: The culture of grief. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WeissG. (1999). Body images: Embodiment as intercorporeality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WoodthorpeK. (2012). Baby gardens: A privilege or predicament? In S.Earle, C.Komaromy, & L.Layne (Eds.), Understanding reproductive loss: Perspectives on life, death and fertility (pp. 143–154). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• ZuckerA. (1999). The psychological impact of reproductive difficulties on women's Lives. Sex Roles, 40, 767–786. doi:10.1023/A:1018812819260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar