References

• Adey, P. (2009). Facing airport security: Affect, biopolitics, and the preemptive securitisation of the mobile body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 274–295.10.1068/d0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 777–798.10.1177/0309132510362600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1–36). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. (2015). The interface envelope: Gaming, technology, power. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, T., & Hoyle, W. (2014). 3D printing for development in the global south: The 3D4D challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137365668
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. (2014). Encountering stressed bodies: Slow creep transformations and tipping points of commuting mobilities. Geoforum, 51, 191–201.10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, G. (2016). The rugged border: Surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34, 245–262.10.1177/0263775815611423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2007). Labor geography: A work in progress. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 853–862.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00761.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockayne, D. (2016). Entrepreneurial affect: Attachment to work practice in San Francisco’s digital media sector. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34, 456–473.10.1177/0263775815618399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. (2013). Geographies of production III: Making space for labor. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 271–284.10.1177/0309132512441318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boever, A., Murray, A., Roffe, J., & Woodward, A. (2012). Gilbert Simondon: Being and technology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Del Casino, V., Jr. (2015). Social geographies II: Robots. Progress in Human Geography, online early.Please provide missing volume and page numbers, if applicable for the ‘Del Casino (2015)’ references list entry.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D., & Bissell, D. (2015). Habit geographies: The perilous zones in the life of the individual. Cultural Geographies, 22, 21–28.10.1177/1474474014561172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose, G. (2015). Negotiating contradiction: Work, redundancy and participatory art. Area, 47, 246–253.10.1111/area.12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellem, B., (2016). Geographies of the labor process: Automation and the spatiality of mining. Work, Employment & Society, 30, 932–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecker, J. (2016). Space, place and global digital work. London: Springer.10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2016). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, C., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford University Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology, http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/view/1314.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 26–49.10.1111/ijur.2005.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, J. (2015). Editing worlds: Participatory mapping and a minor geopolitics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 273–286.10.1111/tran.2015.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for other worlds. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 613–632.10.1177/0309132508090821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2005). Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herod, A. (1997). From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor’s spatial fix and the geography of capitalism. Antipode, 29, 1–31.10.1111/anti.1997.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S., Brown, G., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2011). Editorial introduction: Geographies of education and aspiration. Children’s Geographies, 9, 1–5.10.1080/14733285.2011.540434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L., Bear, C., & Wilkinson, K. (2014). Robotic milking technologies and renegotiating situated ethical relationships on UK dairy farms. Agriculture and Human Values, 31, 185–199.10.1007/s10460-013-9473-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17, 720–739.10.1177/1461444813511926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanngieser, A. (2013). Tracking and tracing: Geographies of logistical governance and laboring bodies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 594–610.10.1068/d24611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. (2012). Futures in the making: Practices to anticipate ‘ubiquitous computing’. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1554–1569.10.1068/a45168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S., & Mitchell, D. (2004). The nature of things: Dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode, 36, 687–705.10.1111/anti.2004.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Kneale, J. (Eds.). (2005). Lost in space: Geographies of science fiction. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. (2016). Algorithmic geographies: Big data, algorithmic uncertainty, and the production of geographic knowledge. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106, 274–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2011). Saving space, sharing time: Integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing. Environment and Planning A, 43, 560–577.10.1068/a43296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapworth, A. (2016). Theorizing bioart encounters after Gilbert Simondon. Theory, Culture & Society, 33, 123–150.10.1177/0263276415580173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, D., & Schwanen, T. (2011). Guest editorial: The space – Times of decision making. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2801–2818.10.1068/a44351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nast, H. (2015). The machine-phallus: Psychoanalyzing the geopolitical economy of masculinity and race. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 766–785.10.1080/07351690.2015.1087283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nast, H. (2016) Into the arms of dolls: Japan’s declining fertility rates, the 1990s financial crisis and the (maternal) comforts of the posthuman. Social & Cultural Geography, online early.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. (2012). Families apart: Migrant mothers and the conflicts of labor and love. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816669981.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. (in press). Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2016). The industries of the future. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. G. R. (2016). Predator empire: Drone warfare and full spectrum dominance. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2016). Automatic society: The future of work, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., & French, S. (2002). The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27, 309–335.10.1111/1475-5661.00057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A., & Gibson, C. (2014). Surfing places, surfboard-makers: Craft, creativity and cultural heritage in Hawai’i, California and Australia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.10.21313/hawaii/9780824838287.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Workplace Policy Institute. (2014). The transformation of the workplace through robotics, artificial intelligence, and automation. San Francisco: Littler Mendelson.
   Google Scholar