References

• Allen, J., & Cars, G. (2001). Multiculturalism and governing neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38, 2195–2209. doi:10.1080/00420980120087126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with difference. Environment and Planning A, 34, 959–980. doi:10.1068/a3537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2005). Local community on trial. Economy and Society, 34, 612–633. doi:10.1080/03085140500277211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging – An analytical framework. Geography Compass, 4, 644–659. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x
   Google Scholar
• Askins, K., & Pain, R. (2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803–821. doi:10.1068/d11109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, M. (2014). Negotiating social mix in Toronto’s first public housing redevelopment: Power, space and social control in don mount court. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1160–1180. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, M., & Jackson, E. (2013). Place-making and place maintenance: Performativity, place and belonging among the middle classes. Sociology, 47, 793–809. doi:10.1177/0038038512454350
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, J. (2009). Thinking spatially: Towards an everyday understanding of interethnic relations. Social & Cultural Geography, 10, 481–498. doi:10.1080/14649360902853288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (2013). Superdiversiteit: Een nieuwe visie op integratie [Super-diversity: A new vision on integration]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, M., Hurenkamp, M., & Tonkens, E. (2014). Flexible relations, frail contacts and failing demands: How community groups and local institutions interact in local governance in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 51, 3365–3382. doi:10.1177/0042098013519832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2009). Participation, social cohesion and the challenges in the governance process: An analysis of a post-World War II neighbourhood in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 17, 109–130. doi:10.1080/09654310802514011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., Völker, B., Lelieveldt, H., & Torenvlied, R. (2010). Civic engagement in urban neighborhoods: Does the network of civic organizations influence participation in neighborhood projects? Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 609–632. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W. (2011). The politics of home: Belonging and nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230305076
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., Reinders, L., & Wekker, F. (2016). Homing the Dutch. Home Cultures, 13, 87–100. doi:10.1080/17406315.2016.1190584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and diversity in the city: Redistribution, recognition and encounter. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06960-3
   Google Scholar
• Fortier, A. M. (2007). Too close for comfort: Loving thy neighbour and the management of multicultural intimacies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 104–119. doi:10.1068/d2404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. C. (2004). Beyond gentrification: Mobilizing communities and claiming space. Urban Geography, 25, 437–457. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.25.5.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, R. (2007). An excess of alterity? Debating difference in a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 979–998. doi:10.1080/01419870701599424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, E. L.-E. (2009). Constituting citizenship through the emotions: Singaporean transmigrants in London. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99, 788–804. doi:10.1080/00045600903102857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach, C., & van Gent, W. P. C. (2015). An anatomy of gentrification processes: Variegating causes of neighbourhood change. Environment and Planning A, 47, 1480–1501. doi:10.1177/0308518X15595771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. S., & Dahlvik, J. (2017). Neighbourhood participation in super-diverse contexts: Comparing Amsterdam and Vienna. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (2002). Against the romance of community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kährik, A. (2006). Tackling social exclusion in European neighbourhoods: Experiences and lessons from the NEHOM project. GeoJournal, 67, 9–25. doi:10.1007/s10708-006-9004-5
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A., Preston, V., & Murnaghan, A. M. (2011). Place, affect, and transnationalism through the voices of Hong Kong immigrants to Canada. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 871–888. doi:10.1080/14649365.2011.624191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, C. (2012). Race, power and social action in neighborhood community organizing: Reproducing and resisting the social construction of the other. Journal of Community Practice, 20, 241–259. doi:10.1080/10705422.2012.700277
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. (2012). Spaces of encounters: Immigration, race, class, and the politics of belonging in small-town America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 828–846. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.601204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., & Ehrkamp, P. (2006). Rethinking immigration and citizenship: New spaces of migrant transnationalism and belonging. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1591–1597. doi:10.1068/a37409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 157–172. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, D. J. (2014). Neighborhood as spatial project: Making the urban order on the downtown Brooklyn waterfront. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 471–497. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. G. (2003a). ‘Place-framing’ as place-making: Constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 730–750. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.9303011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. G. (2003b). Enacting neighborhood. Urban Geography, 24, 361–385. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.24.5.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 717–741. doi:10.1080/14649365.2011.610234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. (1996). Globalization and the politics of place: Place and identity in an inner London neighbourhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, 194–215. doi:10.2307/622933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mee, K., & Wright, S. (2009). Geographies of belonging. Environment and Planning A, 41, 772–779. doi:10.1068/a41364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, N. (2003). Neighbourhoods and social cohesion: Experiences from Europe. International Planning Studies, 8, 115–138. doi:10.1080/13563470305154
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L., & Hiemstra, N. (2008). Latino immigrants and the renegotiation of place and belonging in small town America. Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 319–342. doi:10.1080/14649360801990538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, G. (2009). Everyday cosmopolitanism and the labour of intercultural community. In A. Wise, & S. Velayutham (Eds.), Everyday multiculturalism (pp. 46–65). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244474
   Google Scholar
• OIS. (2014). Amsterdamse Armoedemonitor 2013 [Amsterdam poverty monitor 2013]. Retrieved from https://www.os.amsterdam.nl/pdf/2014_amsterdamse%20armoedemonitor%202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., Athwal, B., Robinson, D., & Harrison, M. (2014). Towards intercultural engagement: Building shared visions of neighbourhood and community in an era of new migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 42–59. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.782146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkster, F. M. (2016). Narratives of neighbourhood change and loss of belonging in an urban garden village. Social and Cultural Geography, 17, 871–891. doi:10.1080/14649365.2016.1139169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Colic-Peisker, V. (2015). Policy narratives versus everyday geographies: Perceptions of changing local space in Melbourne’s diverse north. City & Community, 14, 68–86. doi:10.1111/cico.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (2005). The search for community cohesion: Key themes and dominant concepts of the public policy agenda. Urban Studies, 42, 1411–1427. doi:10.1080/00420980500150755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, F., Shaw, K., & Davidson, G. (2005). ‘On the side of the Angels’: Community involvement in the governance of neighbourhood renewal. Local Economy, 20, 13–26. doi:10.1080/0269094042000313584
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Dembski, S. (2016). Manufacturing the creative city: Symbols and politics of Amsterdam North. Cities, 55, 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secor, A. (2004). “There is an Istanbul that belongs to me”: Citizenship, space, and identity in the city. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 352–368. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, P. (2006). Living apart or together? Multiculturalism at a neighbourhood level. Community Development Journal, 41, 293–306. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi070
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2009). Neighborhood streets as meaningful spaces: Claiming rights to shared spaces in Tokyo. City & Society, 21, 207–229. doi:10.1111/j.1548-44X.2009.01022.x
   Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L. A., & Mitchell, D. (2009). Place, politics of. In N. Thrift, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of human geography (pp. 185–192). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00796-3
   Google Scholar
• Tersteeg, A. K., & Pinkster, F. M. (2016). ‘Us up here and them down there’: How design, management, and neighbourhood facilities shape social distance in a mixed-tenure housing development. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 751–779. doi:10.1177/1078087415601221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D. (2006). Politics of belonging in the construction of landscapes: Place-making, boundary-drawing and exclusion. Cultural Geographies, 13, 421–443. doi:10.1191/1474474006eu366oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2014). Integration and control: The governance of urban marginality in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1418–1436. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gent, W. P. C., Boterman, W. R., & Hoekstra, M. S. (2016). State-sponsored gentrification or social regeneration? Symbolic politics and neighborhood intervention in an Amsterdam working class neighborhood. Centre for Urban Studies Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• van Gent, W. P. C., Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. J. M. (2009). Bridging the social divide? Reflections on current Dutch neighbourhood policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 357–368. doi:10.1007/s10901-009-9144-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 323–337. doi:10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., & Sadgrove, J. (2012). Lived difference: A narrative account of spatiotemporal processes of social differentiation. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2049–2063. doi:10.1068/a44491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VROM Ministry. (2010). Betrokkenheid loont: Succesvol samenwerken met nieuwe Nederlanders in de wijk [Involvement pays off: Work successfully with new Dutch in the neighbourhood]. Retrieved from www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/brochures/2010/11/26/betrokkenheid-loont-in-de-wijk/betrokkenheid-loont.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. (2013). Commonplace diversity and the ‘ethos of mixing’: Perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 20, 407–422. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2013.822374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, N., & Waite, L. (2011). Editorial: Scales of belonging. Emotion, Space and Society, 4, 201–202. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2011.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, B. S. A., & Willis, K. (2005). Singaporean and British transmigrants in China and the cultural politics of contact zones. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 269–285.10.1080/1369183042000339927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40, 197–214. doi:10.1080/00313220600769331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar