2,436
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Interrogating boundaries of the everyday nation through first impressions: experiences of young people in Norway

Interroger les limites de la nation de tous les jours à travers les premières impressions: expériences de jeunes gens en Norvège

Interrogando los límites de la nación cotidiana a través de las primeras impresiones: experiencias de jóvenes en Noruega

&
Pages 119-140 | Received 22 Aug 2017, Accepted 23 Nov 2018, Published online: 20 Dec 2018

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London: Psychology Press.
  • Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 20–49.
  • Amin, A. (2012). Land of strangers. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Andersen, D. J., Klatt, M., & Sandberg, M. (2012). The border multiple. The Practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a re-scaling Europe. Ashgate.
  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of Nationalism. Verso.
  • Antonsich, M. (2008). The narration of Europe in `National’ and `Post-national’ terms. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 505–522.
  • Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging: An analytical framework. Geography Compass, 644–659.
  • Antonsich, M. (2016). The ‘everyday’of banal nationalism–ordinary people’s views on italy and italian. Political Geography, 54, 32-42. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.07.006
  • Antonsich, M. (2018). The face of the nation: Troubling the sameness–Strangeness divide in the age of migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43. doi:10.1111/tran.12236
  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Viking Press.
  • Bendixen, S., Bringslid, M. B., & Vike, H. (Eds.). (2017). Egalitarianism in scandinavia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
  • Brochmann, G., & Kjeldstadli, K. (2008). A history of immigration: The case of Norway 900–2000. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brubaker, R. (1999). The manichean myth: Rethinking the distinction between ‘civic’ and ‘ethnic’ nationalism. In H. Kresi, K. Armingtong, H. Siegrist, & A. Wimmer (Eds.), Nation and national identity (pp. 55–71). Zürich: Rügger.
  • Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • Brubaker, R., Feischmidt, M., Fox, J. E., & Grancea, L. (2006). Nationalist politics and everyday ethnicity in a Transylvanian town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Butcher, M. (2017). Re-working encounter: The role of reflexivity in managing difference. Social and Cultural Geography. doi:10.1080/14649365.2017.1346198
  • Closs Stephens, A. (2016). The affective atmospheres of nationalism. Cultural Geographies, 23, 181–198.
  • Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place. Geography, Ideology, and Transgression Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Edensor, T. (2002). National identity, popular culture and everyday life. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Edensor, T. (2006). Reconsidering national temporalities. European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 525–545.
  • Erdal, M. B. (2018). Å våge å være norske sammen [To dare to be Norwegian together]. In H. Syse (Ed.), Norge etter 22. Juli: Forhandlinger om verdier, identiteter og et motstandsdyktig samfunn. [Norway after the 22 July: Negotiation over values, identities and a resiliet society] (pp. 27–46). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk .
  • Erdal, M. B., & Strømsø, M., . (2018). Children’s rights, participatory research and the co-construction of national belonging. Human Rights Education Review, 1, 25–45.
  • Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
  • Fanon, F. (1963 [1961]). The wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove.
  • Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. New York, NY: Grove Press.
  • Farred, G. (2011). Wretchedness. In N. C. Gibson (Ed.), Living Fanon. Contemporary black history New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.159–172.
  • Fiske, S. T. (2004). Intent and ordinary bias: Unintended thought and social motivation create casual prejudice. Social Justice Research, 17, 117–127.
  • Fox, J. E. (2017). The edges of the nation: A research agenda for uncovering the taken-for-granted foundations of everyday nationhood. Nations and Nationalism, 23, 26–47.
  • Fox, J. E., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities, 8, 536–563.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
  • Goode, J. P., & Stroup, D. R. (2015). Everyday nationalism: Constructivism for the masses. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 717–739.
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
  • Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8, 45–63.
  • Hage, G. (1998). White nation: Fantasies of white supremacy in a multicultural nation. Sydney: Pluto Press.
  • Halvorsen, S. (2015). Encountering occupy London: Boundary making and the territoriality of urban activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33, 314–330.
  • Jones, R., & Merriman, P. (2009). Hot, banal and everyday nationalism: Bilingual road signs in wales. Political Geography, 28, 164–173.
  • Jones, R., Merriman, P., & Mills, S. (2016). Youth organizations and the reproduction of nationalism in Britain: The role of urdd gobaith cymru. Social and Cultural Geography, 17, 714–734.
  • Koefoed, L., & Simonsen, K. (2010). Den fremmede”, byen og nationen: Om livet som etnisk minoritet. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
  • Kolås, Å. (2017). How critical is the event? Multicultural Norway after 22 July 2011. Social Identities, 23, 518–532.
  • Kymlicka, W. (2015). Solidarity in diverse societies: Beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies, 3, 17–26.
  • Lapiņa, L. (2016). Besides conviviality. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6, 33–42.
  • Malik, K. (1996). The meaning of race: Race, history and culture in Western Society. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Malik, K. (2008). Strange fruit: Why both sides are wrong in the race debate. Oxford: Oneworld publications.
  • Matejskova, T., & Antonsich, M. (2015). Governing through diversity: Migration societies in post-multicultural times, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 717–741.
  • Mavroudi, E., & Holt, L. (2015). (Re) constructing nationalisms in schools in the context of diverse globalized societies. Governing through Diversity. Springer, pp. 181–200
  • Meissner, F., & Vertovec, S. (2015). Comparing super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 541–555.
  • Militz, E., & Schurr, C. (2016). Affective nationalism: Banalities of belonging in Azerbaijan. Political Geography, 54, 54–63.
  • Millard, G. (2014). The jealous god: A problem in the definition of nationalism. Ethnicities, 14, 3–24.
  • Miller-Idriss, C. (2009). Blood and culture: Youth, right-wing extremism, and national belonging in contemporary Germany. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
  • Muller Myrdahl, E. M. (2010). Legislating love: Norwegian family reunification law as a racial project. Social and Cultural Geography, 11, 103–116.
  • Nayak, A. (2017). Purging the nation: Race, conviviality and embodied encounters in the lives of British Bangladeshi Muslim young women. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42, 289-302.
  • Osler, A., & Lybaek, L. (2014). Educating ‘the new Norwegian we’: An examination of national and cosmopolitan education policy discourses in the context of extremism and Islamophobia. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 543–566.
  • Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2303–2309.
  • Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2007). New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1222–1243.
  • Skey, M. (2011). National belonging and everyday life: The significance of nationhood in an uncertain World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sohn, C. (2016). Navigating borders’ multiplicity: The critical potential of assemblage. Area, 48, 183–189.
  • Strømsø, M. (2018). All people living in Norway could become norwegian’: How ordinary people blur the boundaries of nationhood. Ethnicities, 146879681878858.
  • Tolia‐Kelly, D. P. (2006). Affect–An ethnocentric encounter? Exploring the ‘universalist’ imperative of emotional/affectual geographies. Area, 38(2), 213–217.
  • Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 323–337.
  • Vassenden, A. (2010). Untangling the different components of norwegianness. Nations and Nationalism, 16, 734–752.
  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 1024–1054.
  • Wilson, H. F. (2017). On geography and encounter: bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography, 41, 451–471. doi:10.1177/0309132516645958
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40, 197–214.