844
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

How housing tenure drives household care strategies and practices

Cómo la tenencia de la vivienda motiva las estrategias y prácticas de cuidado del hogar

Comment le régime d’occupation influence les stratégies et pratiques du care au sein du logement.

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 897-916 | Received 29 Apr 2019, Accepted 01 Aug 2019, Published online: 13 Sep 2019

References

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Financial geography II: Financial geographies of housing and real estate. Progress in Human Geography, 43, 376–387.
  • Allon, F. (2012). Home as investment. In S. J. Smith, M. Elsinga, S. E. Ong, L. Fox O’Mahony, & S. Wachter (Eds.), International encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 404–409). San Diego: Elsevier.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian social trends, moving house, Dec 2010. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features30Dec+2010
  • Bate, B. (2018). Understanding the influence tenure has on meanings of home and homemaking practices. Geography Compass, 12, e12354.
  • Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. London: Routledge.
  • Colic-Peisker, V., Ong, R., & Wood, G. (2015). Asset poverty, precarious housing and ontological security in older age: An Australian case study. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15, 167–186.
  • Cox, R. (2013). Gendered spaces of commoditised care. Social & Cultural Geography, 14, 491–499.
  • Darab, S., & Hartman, Y. (2013). Understanding single older women’s invisibility in housing issues in Australia. Housing, Theory and Society, 30, 348–367.
  • Darab, S., Hartman, Y., & Holdsworth, L. (2018). What women want: Single older women and their housing preferences. Housing Studies, 33, 525–543.
  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
  • Department of Health. (2013). My aged care. Retrieved from www.myagedcare.gov.au
  • Doling, J., & Ronald, R. (2010). Home ownership and asset-based welfare. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25, 165–173.
  • Dyck, I. (1990). Space, time and renegotiating motherhood: An exploration of the domestic workplace. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, 459–483.
  • Easthope, H. (2014). Making a rental property home. Housing Studies, 29, 579–596.
  • Fields, D. (2017). Unwilling Subjects of Financialization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 4, 588–603.
  • Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. E. Abel & M. Nelson (Eds.), Circules of care. Albany: SUNY Press, 35–62.
  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Pawson, H. (2014). Ending security of tenure for social renters: Transitioning to ‘Ambulance service’ social housing? Housing Studies, 29, 597–615.
  • Forrest, R., & Hirayama, Y. (2015). The financialisation of the social project: Embedded liberalism, neoliberalism and home ownership. Urban Studies, 52, 233–244.
  • Fox O’Mahony, L., & Overton, L. (2015). Asset-based welfare, equity release and the meaning of the owned home. Housing Studies, 30, 392–412.
  • Garcia-Lamarca, S., & Kaika, M. (2016). ‘Mortgaged lives’: The biopolitics of debt and housing financialisation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 313–327.
  • Gillon, C. (2017). Under construction: How home-making and underlying purchase motivations surface in a housing building site. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(4), 455–473.
  • Gillon, C., & Gibson, C. (2018). Calculated homes, stretched emotions: Unmasking ‘rational’ investor-occupier subjects in large family homes in a coastal Sydney development. Emotion, Space and Society, 26, 23–30.
  • Gurney, C. M. (1999). Pride and prejudice: Discourses of normalisation in public and private accounts of home ownership. Housing Studies, 14, 163–183.
  • Hayden, D. (1986). Redesigning the American dream: The future of housing, work and family life. New York: WW Norton & Co.
  • Jacobs, K., Berry, M., & Dalton, T. (2013). ‘A dead and broken system?’: ‘Insider’ views of the future role of Australian public housing. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13, 183–201.
  • Kershaw, P. (2005). Carefair: Rethinking the responsibilities and rights of citizenship. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Lancione, M. (2019). Radical housing: On the politics of dwelling as difference. International Journal of Housing Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19491247.2019.1611121
  • Larner, W. (2000). Post-welfare state governance: Towards a code of social and family responsibility. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 7, 244–265.
  • Milligan, C. (2009). There’s no place like home: Place and care in an ageing society. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.
  • Morris, A. (2009). Living on the margins: Comparing older private renters and older public housing tenants in Sydney, Australia. Housing Studies, 24, 693–707.
  • Morris, A. (2018). Housing tenure and the health of older Australians dependent on the age pension for their income. Housing Studies, 33, 77–95.
  • Nethercote, M. (2019a). Caring households: The social ties that house. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 257–273.
  • Nethercote, M. (2019b). Homeowner investor subjects as providers of family care and assistance. Housing Studies, 34, 1037–1063.
  • Office for National Statistics. (2013). A century of home ownership and renting in England and Wales. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/a-century-of-home-ownership-and-renting-in-england-and-wales/short-story-on-housing.html
  • Petersen, M., & Parsell, C. (2015). Homeless for the first time in later life: An Australian study. Housing Studies, 30, 368–391.
  • Power, E. R. (2017). Housing, home ownership and the governance of ageing. The Geographical Journal, 183, 233–246.
  • Power, E. R. (2019). Assembling the capacity to care: Caring-with precarious housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Advance online publication.
  • Power, E. R., & Bergan, T. L. (2018). Care and resistance to neoliberal reform in social housing. Housing, Theory and Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1515112
  • Power, E. R., & Mee, K. J. (2019). Housing: An infrastructure of care. Housing Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1612038
  • Reid, C. K. (2017). Financialization and the subprime subject: The experiences of homeowners during California’s housing boom. Housing Studies, 32, 793–815.
  • Ronald, R. (2008). The ideology of home ownership: Homeowner societies and the role of housing. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sevenhuijsen, S. (2003). The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory, 4, 179–197.
  • Smith, S. J. (2008). Owner-occupation: At home with a hybrid of money and materials. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40, 520–535.
  • Smith, S. J. (2015). Owner occupation: At home in a spatial, financial paradox. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15, 61–83.
  • Smith, S. J., Cigdem, M., Ong, R., & Wood, G. (2017). Wellbeing at the edges of ownership. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49, 1080–1098.
  • Stebbing, A., & Spies-Butcher, B. (2016). The decline of a homeowning society? Asset-based welfare, retirement and intergenerational equity in Australia. Housing Studies, 31, 190–207.
  • Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality and justice. New York: New York University Press.
  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York and London: Psychology Press.
  • Twigg, J. (2000). Bathing, the body and community care. London: Routledge.
  • US Census Bureau. (2013). Census bureau reports rental vacancy rates down nationally. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/american_community_survey_acs/cb13-70.html
  • Waldron, R., & Redmond, D. (2017). ‘We’re just existing, not living!’ Mortgage stress and the concealed costs of coping with crisis. Housing Studies, 32, 584–612.
  • Watson, M. (2010). House price keynesianism and the contradictions of the modern investor subject. Housing Studies, 25, 413–426.
  • Yates, J., & Bradbury, B. (2010). Home ownership as a (crumbling) fourth pillar of social insurance in Australia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25, 193–211.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.