References

• Adam, T. (2018). Zivilgesellschaft oder starker Staat? Das Stiftungswesen in Deutschland (1815–1989) [Philanthropy, civil society, and the state in German history, 1815–1989]. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Adloff, F. (2004). Wozu sind Stiftungen gut? Zur gesellschaftlichen Einbettung des deutschen Stiftungswesens [What are foundations good for? About the societal embeddedness of German foundation]. Leviathan – Zeitschrift Für Sozialwissenschaft, 32, 269–285.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., & Leat, D. (2006). Creative philanthropy. Towards a new philanthropy for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., & Toepler, S. (1999). Philanthropic foundations: An international perspective. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), Private funds, public purpose. philanthropic foundations in international perspective (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Apelt, M., & Tacke, V. (2012). Einleitung [Introduction]. In M. Apelt & V. Tacke (Eds.), Handbuch Organisationstypen [Handbook organization types] (pp. 7–20). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Baecker, D. (2007). Form und Formen der Kommunikation [Form and forms of communication]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. (1938/1971). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, A., & Hagedorn, S. (2014). Stiftungsforschung heute und morgen – Eine Einschätzung des Bundesverbandes Deutscher Stiftungen [Foundation research today and in the future – an evaluation by the association of German foundations]. In A. Zimmer & R. Simsa (Eds.), Forschung zu Zivilgesellschaft, NPOs und Engagement: Quo vadis? [Research about the civil society, NPOs, and engagement: Quo Vadis?] (pp. 373–384). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., & Green, M. F. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2010). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitativer Forschung. [Reconstructive research. An introduction into the methodology and practice of qualitative research]. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bonazzi, G. (2014). Geschichte des organisatorischen Denkens [History of organizational thinking]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Borgolte, M. (Ed.). (2014). Enzyklopädie des Stiftungswesens in mittelalterlichen Gesellschaften. Band 1: Grundlagen [Encyclopedia of the world of foundations in medieval societies, Vol. 1: basics]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Borgolte, M. (Ed.). (2016). Enzyklopädie des Stiftungswesens in mittelalterlichen Gesellschaften. Band 2: Das soziale System Stiftung [Encyclopedia of the world of foundations in medieval societies, Vol. 2: The social system foundation]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggen, S., Keller, K., & Brosziewski, A. (2011). Zwischen Engagement und Professionalität. Organisationsformen von Freiwilligenarbeit am Beispiel einer Initiative im Kanton Thurgau [Between engagment and professionalism. Organizational structures of voluntary work. An example from the Canton Thurgau]. Zürich: Seismo.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. (1999). The history of foundations in the United Kingdom and the Unites States. Philanthropic foundations in industrial society. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), Private funds, public purpose. Philanthropic foundations in international perspective (pp. 27–53). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Caillé, A. (2005). Die doppelte Unbegreiflichkeit der reinen Gabe [The double inconceivability of the pure gift]. In F. Adloff & S. Mau (Eds.), Vom Geben und Nehmen: Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität [About giving and taking: A sociology of reciprocity] (pp. 157–184). Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condliffe Lagemann, E. (1989). The Politics of knowledge. The Carnegie corporation, philanthropy, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delfin, F. G., Jr, & Tang, S.-Y. (2007). Elitism, pluralism, or resource dependency: Patterns of environmental philanthropy among private foundations in California. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2167–2186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugatkin, L. A. (2006). Trust in Fish. Nature, 441, 937–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Foundation Centre. (2015). Comparative highlights of foundation laws. The operating environment for foundations in Europe. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2010). The essence of strategic giving: A Practical guide for donors and Fundraisers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout, J. T. (2000). The World of the Gift. (D. Winkler, Trans.). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goeke, P. (2016). Kontrollprojekte – Neue Organisationsstrukturen der Freiwilligenarbeit [Control projects – New organizational forms of voluntary work]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 104, 112–135.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, R. A. (2003). Giving in America: From charity to philanthropy. In L. J. Friedman & M. D. McGarvie (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy and civility in American history (pp. 29–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. (2008). Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy. Geoforum, 39, 1241–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, I., & Muller, S. (2014). Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: Towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1978). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. (2012). Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change, 43, 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horch, H.-D. (1983). Strukturbesonderheiten freiwilliger Vereinigungen. Analyse und Untersuchung einer alternativen Form menschlichen Zusammenarbeitens [Structural particularities of voluntary associations. Analysis and Investigation of Alternative Forms of Human Collaboration]. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, P. (2003). Gemeinnützigkeit – Erfüllung staatsähnlicher Aufgaben durch selbstlose Einkommensverwendung [Public benefit – Fulfilment of Quasi-Governmental tasks via charitable application of income]. In M. Jachmann (Ed.), Gemeinnützigkeit [Public benefit] (pp. 1–9). Köln: Otto Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Kühl, S. (Ed.). (2015). Schlüsselwerke der Organisationsforschung [Keyworks of Organization Theory]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Letts, C. W., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital. What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1964). Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisationen [Functions and consequencens of formal organizations]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung [Organization and decisions]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997/2012). Theory of Society (Vol. 1). (R. Barrett, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2016). Der neue Chef [The new chief]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• MacAskill, W. (2015). Doing good better. How effective altruism can help you make a difference. New York, NY: Gotham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (2002). The gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S. (1945). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7(2), 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2014). The Philanthropic State: Market-state hybrids in the Philanthrocapitalist turn. Third World Quarterly, 35, 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2015). No such thing as a free gift: The gates foundation and the price of philanthropy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Sparke, M. (2016). The new Washington consensus: Millennial Philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode, 48, 724–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, K. R. (1994). A fat lady in a corset: Altruism and social theory. American Journal of Political Sciences, 38, 861–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münkler, H., & Bluhm, H. (2001). Einleitung: Gemeinwohl und Gemeinsinn als politisch-soziale Leitbegriffe [Introduction: Common good and public spirit as socio-political guiding concepts]. In H. Münkler & H. Bluhm (Eds.), Gemeinwohl und Gemeinsinn (Bd. 1). Historische Semantiken politischer Leitbegriffe [Common good and public spirit, Vol. 1. Historical semantics of political guiding concepts] (pp. 9–30). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nally, D., & Taylor, S. (2015). The politics of self-help: The Rockefeller Foundation, philanthropy and ›long‹ Green Revolution. Political Geography, 49, 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odendahl, T. (1990). Charity begins at Home. Generosity and Self-Interest among the Philanthropic Elite. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978/2003). The External Control of Organizations. A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2004). Better together. Restoring the American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R., Tompkins-Stange, M., & Meyerson, D. (2014). Beyond Grantmaking: Philanthropic Foundations as Agents of Change and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 950–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reemtsma, J. P. (2012, November 30). Ihre Willkür soll Euch willkommen sein [You Shall Welcome their Arbitrariness] Süddeutsche Zeitung, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, J. (2015). How foundations exercise power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74, 654–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2011). Why philanthro-policymaking matters. Society, 48, 376–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 679–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. (2008). Using lessons from public affairs to inform strategic philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 537–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, T. (2010). Bertelsmann Republik Deutschland. Eine Stiftung macht Politik [Bertelsmann Republic Germany. A Foundation makes policies]. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations. Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2015). The most good you can do. How effective altruism is changing ideas about ethical living. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2003). Raum und moderne Gesellschaft. Aspekte der sozialen Kontrolle des Raums [Space and modern society. Aspects of social control of space]. In T. Krämer-Badoni & K. Kuhm (Eds.), Die Gesellschaft und ihr Raum. Raum als Gegenstand der Soziologie [The society and its space. Space as an object of sociology] (pp. 93–102). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedesco, D. (2015). American foundations in the great bear rainforest: Philanthrocapitalism, governmentality, and democracy. Geoforum, 65, 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Foerster, H. (1970/2003). Thoughts and Notes on Cognition. In H. von Foerster (Ed.), Understanding understanding. Essays on cybernetics and cognition (pp. 169–189). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Wu, X. (2014). Volunteers’ motivation, satisfaction, and management in large-scale events: An empirical test from the 2010 Shanghai World Expo. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A., & Bell, M. (2014). Knowledge nodes and international networks of connection: Representations of private philanthropy by elite higher education institutions. Social & Cultural Geography, 15, 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. (E. Fischoff, H. Gerth, A. M. Henderson, F. Kolegar, C. W. Mills, T. Parsons, M. Rheinstein, G. Roth, E. Shils & C. Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, A., & Reiter, H. (2012). The problem-centred interview. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zunz, O. (2012). Philanthropy in America. A history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar