References

• Adams, M., & Guy, S. (2007). Editorial: Senses and the city. The Senses and Society, 2(2), 133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. (2017). Mobility. Florence: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Avila-Tapies, R., & Dominiguez-Mujica, J. (2014). Interpreting autobiographies in migration research: Narratives of Japanese returnees from the Canary Islands (Spain): Interpreting autobiographies in migration research. Area, 46(2), 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajerski, A. (2011). The role of French, German and Spanish journals in scientific communication in international geography. Area, 43(3), 305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijsterveld, K. (2010). Acoustic cocooning: How the car became a place to unwind. The Senses and Society, 5(2), 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bild, E., Coler, M., Pfeffer, K., & Bertolini, L. (2016). Considering sound in planning and designing public spaces: A review of theory and applications and a proposed framework for integrating research and practice. Journal of Planning Literature, 31(4), 419–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2014). Infrastructures of superdiversity: Conviviality and language in an Antwerp neighborhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2013). Introduction special issue: Mixing neighbourhoods: Success or failure? Cities, 35, 391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. S. (2017). DIVERCITIES, governing urban diversity: Creating social cohesion, social mobility and economic performance in today’s hyper- diversified cities. Impact, 2017, 26–4155.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. S., Visser, K., & Tersteeg, A. K. (2017). Can diversity in cities create social cohesion? Open Access Government, 15, 240–7612.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfiglioli, C. (2015). La course de vélo du Gordel autour de Bruxelles-Capitale: Matérialisation d’une frontière communautaire?. National Committee of Geography of Belgium/Société Royale Belge De Géographie, 2, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Botteldooren, D., Andringa, T., Aapuru, I., Brown, L., Dubois, D., Gustavino, C., … Preis, A. (2013). Soundscape for European cities and landscape: Understanding and exchanging. COST TD0804 Final conference: Soundscape of European cities and landscapes 2013(pp. 36–43). Presented at the COST TDO804 Final conference: Soundscape of the European cities and landscapes, Oxford, UK: Soundscape-COST.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Kang, J., & Gjestland, T. (2011). Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment. Applied Acoustics, 72(6), 387–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, M., Back, L., & Howes, D. (2015). The auditory culture reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. S. (1987). Remembering: A phenomenological study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chríost, D. M. G. (2001). Implementing political agreement in Northern Ireland: Planning issues for Irish language policy. Social & Cultural Geography, 2(3), 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Chríost, D. M. G., & Aitchisont, J. (1998). Ethnic identities and language in Northern Ireland. Area, 30(4), 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chríost, D. M. G., & Thomas, H. (2008). Linguistic diversity and the city: Some reflections, and a research agenda. International Planning Studies, 13(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crul, M. (2016). Super- diversity vs. assimilation: How complex diversity in majority– Minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(1), 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De9Straatjes. (2018). Retrieved from https://de9straatjes.nl/nl/home
   Google Scholar
• Desforges, L., & Jones, R. (2001). Bilingualism and geographical knowledge: A case study of students at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth. Social & Cultural Geography, 2(3), 333–346.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, K., & Lagerqvist, M. (2016). The ethical potential of sound in public space: Migrant pan flute music and its potential to create moments of conviviality in a ‘ failed’ public square. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozdzewski, D. (2017). Less- than- fluent’ and culturally connected: Language learning and cultural fluency as research methodology. Area, 50(1), 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., Gustavino, C., & Raimbault, M. (2006). A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes: Using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 92(6), 865–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. (2010). Linguistic landscapes in the Netherlands: A study of multilingualism in Amsterdam and Friesland. Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2007). Sensing the Ruin. The Senses and Society, 2(2), 217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., Tasan-Kok, T., & Vranken, J. (2010). Diversity matters: Immigrant entrepreneurship and contribution of different forms of social integration in economic performance of cities. European Planning Studies, 18(4), 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, S. (2012). Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics, and song in Kaluli expression, with a new introduction by the author. Philadelphia: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., & Leitner, H. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, J. M., & Bowman, J. A. (2017). Geographies on the move: A practical and theoretical approach to the mobile interview. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. (2006). Postcolonial melancholia. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2000). The multi-cultural question. In B. Hesse (Ed.), Unsettled multiculturalisms, diasporas, entanglements, disruptions. London, New York: Zed books.
   Google Scholar
• Hardwick, S. W., & Davis, R. L. (2009). Content-based language instruction: A new window of opportunity in geography education. Journal of Geography, 108, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, G., Lossau, J., & Oslender, U. (2005). Einfach sprachlos but not simply speechless: Language(s), thought and practice in the social sciences. Area, 37(3), 242–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R., & Jones, V. (2004). Living with plants and the exploration of botanical encounter within human geographic research practice. Ethics, Place & Environment, 7(1–2), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. S. (2015). Diverse cities and good citizenship: How local governments in the Netherlands recast national integration discourse. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(10), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. S., & Pinkster, F. M. (2019). ‘we want to be there for everyone’: imagined spaces of encounter and the politics of place in a super- diverse neighbourhood. Social & Cultural Geography, 20(2), 222–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iscen, O. E. (2014). In-between soundscapes of Vancouver: The newcomer’s acoustic experience of a city with a sensory repertoire of another place. Organised Sound, 19(2), 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, R. (2007a). De Brusselse taalbarometer. Brussel: VUBPress.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, R. (2007b). Van Brussel gesproken: Taalgebruik, taalverschuivingen en taalidentiteit in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest (Taalbarometer II). Brussel: ASP/VUBPRESS/UPA.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, R. (2013). Meertaligheid als cement van de stedelijke samenleving. Een analyse van de Brusselse taalsituatie op basis van Taalbarometer, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London/New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. California: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanngieser, A. (2012). A sonic geography of voice: Towards an affective politics. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 336–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, R. A., & Berg, L. D. (2002). Proclaiming place: Towards a geography of place name pronunciation. Social & Cultural Geography, 3(3), 283–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kielland, I. M. (2016). Strange encounters in place stories. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R. C. (2014). Faces of migration: Migrants and the transformation of Amsterdam. London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, D. (2001). Doing the Doric: The institutionalization of regional language and culture in the north- east of Scotland. Social & Cultural Geography, 2(3), 315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Koefoed, L., Christensen, M. D., & Simonsen, K. (2016). Mobile encounters: Bus 5A as a cross-cultural meeting place. Mobilities, 12(5), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, P. A. (2011). The multilingual city; the cases of Helsinki and Barcelona. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, P. A. (2012). The politics of complex diversity: A European perspective. Ethnicities, 12(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C., & Wood, D. P. (2012). The intercultural city: Planning for diversity advantage. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapina, L. (2016). Besides conviviality; paradoxes in being ‘at ease’ with diversity in a Copenhagen district. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6, 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2004). Culture from the ground: Walking, movement and placemaking, Unpublished paper, Social Anthropologists Conference (March 2004), Durham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M. (1993). Modernity and the hegemony of vision. California: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., & Wageningen, A. (Eds.). (2016). Urban Europe: Fifty tales of the city Amsterdam, Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Matos Wunderlich, F. (2008). Walking and rhythmicity: Sensing urban space. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Mattissek, A., & Glasze, G. (2014). Discourse analysis in German- language human geography: Integrating theory and method. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgregor, A. (2005). Negotiating nature: Exploring discourse through small group research. Area, 37(4), 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. (2010). Sense and the city: Exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(6), 575–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawski, M., & Budke, A. (2017). Language awareness in geography education: An analysis of the potential of bilingual geography education for teaching geography to language learners. European Journal of Geography, 7(5), 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, M. (2014). Languages in motion: Multilingualism and mobility in the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 457–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessen, M., Cance, C., & Dubois, D. (2010). Categories for soundscape: Toward a hybrid classification, Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings 2010, pp. 5816–5829. Institute of Noise Control Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., Loopmans, M., Schuermans, N., Vandenabeele, J., & Zemni, S. (2016). Putting flesh to the bone. Looking for solidarity in diversity, here and now. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(5), 764–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, B. (2012). Listening, language, and colonialism on Main Street, Gibraltar. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9(2), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Hubbard, P., O’Niell, M., & Radley, A. (2010). Walking across disciplines: From ethnography to arts practice. Visual Studies, 25(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkster, F. M., & Boterman, W. R. (2017). When the spell is broken: Gentrification, urban tourism and privileged discontent in the Amsterdam canal district. Cultural Geographies, 24(3), 457–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. M. (1993). The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester: VT Destiny Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. (1979). A geography of the lifeworld: Movement, rest and encounter. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Sebba, M. (2010). Discourses in transit. In A. Jaworksi & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp.59-76). London/New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Segrott, J. (2001). Language, geography and identity: The case of the Welsh in London. Social & Cultural Geography, 2(3), 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (1996). Flesh and stone: The body and the city in Western civilization. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2010). The public realm. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), The Blackwell city reader (pp. 261–272). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. G., Ben- Rafael, E. B., & Barni, M. (2010). Linguistic landscape in the city. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M., & Davydova, J. (2013). Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J. (1997). Beyond geography’s visible worlds: A cultural politics of music. Progress in Human Geography, 21(4), 502–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. (2001). Wanderlust: A history of walking. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods,(post) phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., Van Kempen, R., Mike, R., & Bolt, G. (2014). Towards hyper-diversified European cities: A critical literature review. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Te Brommelstroet, M., Nikolaeva, A., Glaser, M., Nicolaisen, M. S., & Chan, C. (2017). Travelling together alone and alone together: Mobility and potential exposure to diversity. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tersteeg, A. K., & Bolt, G. S. (2018). Opportunities for social cohesion in diverse and deprived neighbourhoods. Open Access Government, 17, 272–7612.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, G. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Ranard,&, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 37–77). Washington, DC and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., Sporton, D., & Bang Nielsen, K. (2008). Language use on the move: Sites of encounter, identities and belonging. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(3), 376–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duppen, J., & Spierings, B. (2013). Retracing trajectories: The embodied experience of cycling, urban sensescapes and the commute between ‘neighbourhood’ and ‘city’ in Utrecht, NL. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super- diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2010). Towards post‐multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity. International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. B. (2018). Performing everyday cosmopolitanism? Uneven encounters with diversity among first generation new Chinese migrants in New Zealand. Ethnicities, 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Wise, M. (2006). Defending national linguistic territories in the European single market: Towards more transnational geolinguistic analysis. Area, 38(2), 204–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J. (2016). The ambivalence of familiarity: Understanding breathable diversity through fleeting encounters in Singapore’s Jurong West. Area, 48(1), 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar