References

• Amin, A. (2006). The Good City. Urban Studies, 43(5–6), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Bridge, G. (2005). Gentrification in a global context. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M., & O’Connor, J. (2017). Inside the whale (and how to get out of there): Moving on from two decades of creative industries research. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417733002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2003). Reinventing urban citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102032000065946
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 135–151. 0701342741. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028663
   Google Scholar
• Beyes, T. (2010). Uncontained: The art and politics of reconfiguring urban space. Culture and Organization, 16(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2010.503499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BISA. (2021). Mini-Bru. Het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest in cijfers 2020. https://bisa.brussels/publicaties/mini-bru (accessed 16 February 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2006). Another turn. The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. Artforum International, 44(9), 24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BKO/RAB. (2014). Cultuurbeleid in Brussel: Een caleidoscoop. Brussels Kunstenoverleg vzw/ Réseau des Arts a Bruxelles asbl.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, J., & Bianchini, F. (2001). Cultural citizenship and urban governance in Western Europe. In N. Stevenson (Ed.), Culture and citizenship (pp. 99–123). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (1998). Esthétique relationelle. Presses du reél.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, P. (2011). The recuperation of participatory arts practices. International Journal for Art and Design Education, 30(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corijn, E. (2009). Urbanity as a political project: Towards Post-national European Cities. In L. Kong & J. O’Connor (Eds.), Creative Economies, Creative Cities (pp. 197–206). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corijn, E., & Vloeberghs, E. (2013). Preface: Brussels, a small world city. In E. Corijn & J. Van de Ven (Eds.), The Brussels reader: A small world city to become the capital of Europe (pp. 13–27). VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deceur, E., Roets, G., Rutten, K., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2016). A singer is a group’: Creating a ‘researcher template’ to uncover complexities in the participatory arts project rocsa singers. Critical Arts, 30(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2016.1205322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewinter, H., Rutten, K., & Bradt, L. (2020). Policy attachment in the arts: The underlying agendas of arts’ social role. Cultural Trends, 29(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2020.1763780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewinter, H., Rutten, K., & Bradt, L. (2021). From the social to the urban question: The pedagogical role of participatory arts practices in cities in transformation. European Journal of Social Work, 24(6), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1633277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Government. (2020December15) The Federal Government’s powers. https://www.belgium.be/en/about_belgium/government/federal_authorities/competence_federal_government
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, P. (2019). Community art – A neo-liberal solution for the deconstruction of welfare state? In N. Carpentier (Ed.), Respublika! Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy (pp. 67–81). Publisher NeMe.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, C., Oosterlynck, S., & Bradt, L. (2020). Livable streets? Green gentrification and the displacement of longtime residents in Ghent, Belgium. Urban Geography, 41(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1686307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, J., & Corijn, E. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies, 42(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500035436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public art and urban regeneration: Advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landscape Research, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390120024457
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, R. (2018). Meertaligheid als opdracht. Een analyse van de Brusselse taalsituatie op basis van taalbarometer 4. VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kesteloot, C., & Loopmans, M. 2009. Inégalités sociales. Brussels Studies Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1009
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. H. (2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, C., & Bianchini, F. (1995). The Creative City. Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofland, L. (1973). A world of strangers. Order and action in urban public space. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, A. (2009). Intervening in the environment of the everyday. Geoforum, 40(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2016). Rediscovering the social question. European Journal of Social Work, 19(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1082984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. (2014). The new urban question. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, G. (2013). Strange familiarities: A response to Ash Amin’s land of strangers. Identities, 20(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2012.752373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., Loopmans, M., Schuermans, N., Vandenabeele, J., & Zemni, S. (2016). Putting flesh to the bone: Looking for solidarity in diversity, here and now. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(5), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1080380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 3). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. R., & Nielsen, S. D. (2021). The reconfiguration of publics and spaces through art: Strategies of agitation and amelioration. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.1898766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2010). Embedding public art: Practice, policy and problems. Journal of Urban Design, 31(4), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.487810
   Google Scholar
• Rea, A. (2013). Immigration and diversity. In E. Corijn & J. Van de Ven (Eds.), The Brussels reader: A small world city to become the capital of Europe (pp. 244–265). VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyskens, P., & Vandenabeele, J. (2016). Parading urban togetherness: A video record of Brussels‘ Zinneke Parade. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(5), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1126627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouyet, Y. 2014. Rock the Canal! A history of cultural life in the canal area of Brussels. Brussels Studies. Advance online publication Brussels Studies https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1212
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, K., Calleeuw, H., Roets, G., & Van Gorp, A. (2019). Cultural policy and participatory art practices in Flanders. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(2), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2018-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuermans, N., Loopmans, M., & Vandenabeele, J. (2012). Public space, public art and public pedagogy. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.728007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen, R. (2006). Stitch & Split: Een relationele versie van gemeenschap. Wisselwerk Cahier, 6, 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W., Patrizio, C., & Montarzino, A. (2005). Research on public art: Assessing impact and quality. Edinburgh College of Art & Heriot-Watt University.
   Google Scholar
• Trienekens, S., & Hillaert, W. (2015). Kunst in transitie: manifest voor participatieve kunstpraktijken. Demos. http://www.demos.be/kenniscentrum/publicatie/kunst-in-transitie-manifest-voor-participatieve-kunstpraktijken
   Google Scholar
• Van Wynsberghe, C. (2013). Institutional complexity as consensus model. In E. Corijn & J. Van de Ven (Eds.), The Brussels reader: A small world city to become the capital of Europe (pp. 94–107). VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zebracki, M., Van der Vaart, R., & Van Aalst, I. (2010). Deconstructing public Artopia: Situating public-art claims within practice. Geoforum, 41(5), 786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar