References

• Ahuja, S., Nikolova, N., & Clegg, S. (2017). Paradoxical identity: The changing nature of architectural work and its relation to architects’ identity. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., & Guy, S. (2009). Governing through translations: Intermediaries and the mediation of the EU’s urban waste water directive. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080902891244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, J. (1984). Architects and firms: A sociological perspective on architectural practice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butzin, A., & Rehfeld, D. (2013). The balance of change in continuity in the German construction sector’s development path. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 57(1–2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2013.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., & Finn, R. (2005). ‘Remember I’m the bloody architect!’: Architects, organizations and discourses of profession. Work, Employment and Society, 19(4), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005058065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxe, W., Hartung, N., Hochberg, H., Lewis, B., Maister, D., Mattox, R., & Piven, P. (1986). Charting your course. Master strategies for organizing and managing architecture firms. Architectural Technology, pp. 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The story of practice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deamer, P. (2020). Architecture and labor (1st ed.), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429325182-1
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, V., & Grubbauer, M. (2022). The icon as a collaborative performance: Non-standard solutions, invisible work and networks of trust in the construction of the Elbe Philharmonic Hall, Hamburg. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(2), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-03-2021-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, J., & Thiel, J. (2022). Star architecture projects and the geographies of innovation across the construction supply chain: The case of the Elbphilharmonie. European Planning Studies, 30(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1951176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. (2009). The regulation of design in global architecture firms: Embedding and emplacing buildings. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2537–2554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. (2010). Global architects: Learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice. Environment and Planning A, 42(12), 2842–2858. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., & Guy, S. (2009). Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for Low-carbon buildings. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2577–2594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2009). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91538-8
   Google Scholar
• Gluch, P. (2009). Unfolding roles and identities of professionals in construction projects: Exploring the informality of practices. Construction Management & Economics, 27(10), 959–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903179728
   Google Scholar
• Gottschling, P. (2018). Architectural scripts: Construction procurement within the user worlds of building events. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(5), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1296178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandclément, C., Karvonen, A., & Guy, S. (2015). Negotiating comfort in low energy housing: The politics of intermediation. Energy Policy, 84, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbauer, M. (2015). Circulating knowledge, marketization and norm-making: International developers and construction firms in Eastern Europe since 2000. Global Networks, 15(3), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbauer, M., & Steets, S. (2014). The making of architects: Knowledge production and legitimation in education and professional practice. Architectural Theory Review, 19(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2014.899069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, W., & Stehn, L. (2019). Entrepreneurial innovation in the construction sector: Overcoming process discontinuities in projects. In M. I. Havenvid, Å. Linné, L. E. Bygballe, & C. Harty (Eds.), The connectivity of innovation in the construction industry (pp. 52–67). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, R. (2012). Future practice conversations from the edge of architecture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006eu354oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M., & Merriman, P. (2011). Practising architectures. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.565884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2004). Spaces of global cultures: Architecture, urbanism, identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R. (2010). Building a career: Labour practices and cluster reproduction in Dutch architectural design. Regional Studies, 44(7), 859–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903236873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, P. L., & Taylor, P. (2005). Toward a geography of the globalization of architecture office networks. Journal of Architectural Education, 58(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488053420942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P. (2010). Architectural movements, utopian moments: (in)coherent renderings of the Hundertwasser-Haus, Vienna Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2001). Towards a critical geography of architecture: The case of an Ersatz Colosseum. Ecumene, 8(1), 51–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800103
   Google Scholar
• Lorne, C. (2017). Spatial agency and practising architecture beyond buildings. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(2), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1174282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2013). The labour of refurbishment. The building and the body in space and time. In S. Pink, D. Tutt, & A. R. J. Dainty (Eds.), Ethnographic research in the construction industry (pp. 23–40). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, S. (2017). The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects. Research Policy, 46(8), 1399–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). In search of the global architect: The case of Norman Foster (and partners). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2009). The global architect: Firms, fame and urban form. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medd, W., & Marvin, S. (2008). Making water work: Intermediating between regional strategy and local practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, D., Turner, J., & Jewkes, Y. (2016). Becoming big things: Building events and the architectural geographies of incarceration in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management & Governance, 4(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009941416749
   Google Scholar
• Orr, R. J., Scott, W. R., Levitt, R. E., Artto, K., & Kujala, J. (2011). Global projects: Distinguishing features, drivers, and challenges. In W. R. Scott, R. E. Levitt, & R. J. Orr (Eds.), Global projects: Institutional and political challenges (pp. 15–51). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Tutt, D., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2013). Ethnographic research in the construction industry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203834671
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., Degen, M., & Basdas, B. (2010). More on ‘big things’: Building events and feelings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruge, J., Dimitrova, V., Grubbauer, M., & Bögle, A. (2022). Models, mock-ups and materials: Artefacts of collaboration in the planning of large-scale construction projects. Building Research & Information, 50(8), 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2070451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, D. (2013). ‘Danger building site-keep out!?’: A critical agenda for geographical engagement with contemporary construction industries. Social & Cultural Geography, 14(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.737009
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D. J., & Dainty, A. (2012). Understanding power within project work: The neglected role of material and embodied registers. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(4), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.648619
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D., & Vitry, C. (Eds.). (2018). Societies under construction geographies, Sociologies and histories of building. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73996-0
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, F. (2018). Why architects matter: Evidencing and communicating the value of architects. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sapsed, J., & Salter, A. (2004). Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1515–1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strebel, I. (2011). The living building: Towards a geography of maintenance work. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.564732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, M., & Jensen, O. (2007). Travelling ideas, power and place: The cases of urban villages and business improvement districts. International Planning Studies, 12(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701453778
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2018). Changing locus of innovation: A micro-process approach on the dynamics of proximity. European Planning Studies, 26(12), 2304–2322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1529143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, J. (2013). Architecture depends. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). Connections. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1068/d322t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vriesema, M. A., & Kloosterman, R. C. (2022). Recapturing creative space in architectural design unravelling the production network of a young, innovative architectural practice in Rotterdam. Creative Industries Journal, 15(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2022.2030102
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A., & Phelps, N. (2018). Towards a geography of intermediaries. Environment and Planning A, 50(6), 1290–1294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18791172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. (2009). Made by the office for metropolitan architecture: An ethnography of design. Publishers.
   Google Scholar